Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Obezlerde manüel ve hedef kontrollü propofol infüzyonunun etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
10–18
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Remifentanil was infused at 0.3 pg kg"1 min1 maintaining bispectral index at 40-60 in both groups after induction dosage of 1 pg kg"1 Hemodynamics, propofol consumption; time passed up to extubation, an Aldrete score > 9 and first requirement of an analgesic, together with patient satisfaction and side effects were documented.Results: Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher at incision, at intraoperative 25 min, while heart rate increased significantly at the time of intubation, and incision and at 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30., 40 min intraoperatively in Group H (p 9, and propofol consumption were increased significantly in Group H (p0.05).Conclusion: Manually controlled infusion of propofol; calculated according to total body weight may be preferred safely in obese patients; as it provides sufficient anesthetic depth, attenuating cardiovascular changes, propofol consumption, and prolonging the time to the need for a rescue analgesic in comparison to target controlled infusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to compare the effects of propofol dosages calculated according to total body weight, and administered via target or manually controlled infusion on hemodynamics, propofol consumption, and recovery in obese laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.Material and Method: After obtaining the approval and informed consent of The Ethics Committee, 60 ASA I-1II patients with body mass indexes of 30-40 kg m 2 were allocated randomly into two equal groups according to method of propofol infus|on as target (H) or manually (M) controlled.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Group H, anesthesia induction and maintanence was managed with propofol at plasma target concentrations of 2.5-3.5 pg mL"1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Remifentanil was infused at 0.3 pg kg"1 min1 maintaining bispectral index at 40-60 in both groups after induction dosage of 1 pg kg"1 Hemodynamics, propofol consumption; time passed up to extubation, an Aldrete score > 9 and first requirement of an analgesic, together with patient satisfaction and side effects were documented.Results: Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher at incision, at intraoperative 25 min, while heart rate increased significantly at the time of intubation, and incision and at 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30., 40 min intraoperatively in Group H (p 9, and propofol consumption were increased significantly in Group H (p0.05).Conclusion: Manually controlled infusion of propofol; calculated according to total body weight may be preferred safely in obese patients; as it provides sufficient anesthetic depth, attenuating cardiovascular changes, propofol consumption, and prolonging the time to the need for a rescue analgesic in comparison to target controlled infusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to compare the effects of propofol dosages calculated according to total body weight, and administered via target or manually controlled infusion on hemodynamics, propofol consumption, and recovery in obese laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.Material and Method: After obtaining the approval and informed consent of The Ethics Committee, 60 ASA I-1II patients with body mass indexes of 30-40 kg m 2 were allocated randomly into two equal groups according to method of propofol infus|on as target (H) or manually (M) controlled. In Group H, anesthesia induction and maintanence was managed with propofol at plasma target concentrations of 2.5-3.5 pg mL"1. Group M received propofol as an maintenance dose of 2 mg kg1 and then a bolus infusion of 3-10 mg kg"1 hr1. Remifentanil was infused at 0.3 pg kg"1 min1 maintaining bispectral index at 40-60 in both groups after induction dosage of 1 pg kg"1 Hemodynamics, propofol consumption; time passed up to extubation, an Aldrete score > 9 and first requirement of an analgesic, together with patient satisfaction and side effects were documented.Results: Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher at incision, at intraoperative 25 min, while heart rate increased significantly at the time of intubation, and incision and at 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30., 40 min intraoperatively in Group H (p 9, and propofol consumption were increased significantly in Group H (p0.05).Conclusion: Manually controlled infusion of propofol; calculated according to total body weight may be preferred safely in obese patients; as it provides sufficient anesthetic depth, attenuating cardiovascular changes, propofol consumption, and prolonging the time to the need for a rescue analgesic in comparison to target controlled infusion.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada; obez, laparoskopik kolesistektomi olgularında, total vücut ağırlığına göre hesaplanan propofolün hedef veya manüel kontrollü infüzyon yöntemi ile uygulanmasının hemodinami, propofol tüketimi ve derlenme üzerine etkilerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda etik kurul onayı ve yazılı izinleri alınan, vücut kitle indeksi 30-40 kg m-2 olan, ASA I-III grubunda 60 olgu, propofolün total vücut ağırlığına göre, hedef veya manüel kontrollü infüzyon ile verilmesine göre rasgele 2 eşit gruba ayrıldı. Grup H’de propofol için indüksiyon ve sonrasında plazma hedef konsantrasyonu 2.5-3.5 μg mL-1 olacak şekilde ve remifentanil 1 μg kg-1 bolus uygulandıktan sonra; Grup M’de indüksiyonda propofol 2 mg kg-1, remifentanil 1 μg kg-1 bolus uygulandıktan sonra, idamede propofol infüzyon hızı 3-10 mg kg-1 sa-1 ve sonrasında her iki grupta, bispektral indeks 40-60 arasında olacak şekilde; remifentanil infüzyonu 0.3 μg kg-1 dk-1 uygulandı. Hemodinami, propofol tüketimi, ekstübasyon, Aldrete skoru ≥ 9 olma ve ilk analjezik gereksinim süresi, yan etkiler ve hasta memnuniyeti değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama arter basıncı, cerrahi insizyonda ve intraoperatif 25. dk.’da, kalp atım hızı, entübasyonda, cerrahi insizyonda ve intraoperatif 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30., 40. dk.’da Grup H’de Grup M’ye göre anlamlı yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

İZDEŞ, S., KESİMCİ, E., AKYOL, B. A., KANBAK, O. (2022). Obezlerde manüel ve hedef kontrollü propofol infüzyonunun etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 10–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/619823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Albertin A, Poli D, La Colla L, et al. Predictive performance of 'Servin's formula' during BIS-guided propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion in morbidly obese patients, Br J Ana-esth 2007
  2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael321 PMid:17132644 2.Coetzee JF. Total intravenous anaesthesia to obese patients: largely guesswork?, Eur J Ana-esthesiol 2009
  3. http://dx.d0i.0rg/l 0.1097/EJA.0b013e328329c6e2 PMid:19359991 3.Alvarez AO, Cascardo A, Albarracin Menen-dez S, Capria JJ, Cordero RA. Total intravenous anesthesia with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cistracurium in morbid obesity, Obes Surg 2000
  4. http://dx.d0i.0rg/l 0.1381/096089200321629120 PMid:11007629 4.Gale T, Leslie K, Kluger M. Propofol anaesthesia via target controlled infusion or manually controlled infusion: effects on the bispectral index as a measure of anaesthetic depth, Anaesth Intensive Care 2001
  5. PMid:11771598 5.Fried M, Peskovâ M, Kasalicky M. The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of morbid obesity, Obes Surg 1998
  6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1381/096089298765554089 PMid:9819083 6.Erk G, Erdoğan G, Şahin F, Taspinar V, Dikmen B. Anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparative evaluation-desflurane/sevoflura-ne vs. propofol, Middle East J Anesthesiol 2007
  7. Passot S, Servin F, Allary R, et al. Target-controlled versus manually-controlled infusion of propofol for direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, Anesth Analg 2002
  8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200205000-00030 8.Kordan A, Günaydın B. Farklı dozlarda deks-medetomidinin laringoskopi ve endotrakeal entübasyona karşı oluşan hemodinamik yanıta, peroperatuar anestezik gereksinimine ve derlenmeye etkilerinin karşılaştırılması, Anestezi Dergisi 2006
  9. Casati A, Putzu M. Anesthesia in the obese patient: pharmacokinetic considerations, J Clin Anesth 2005
  10. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.01.009 PMid:15809132 10.uvin P, Vadam C, Malek L, Dupont H, Marmuse JP, Desmonts JM. Postoperative recovery after desflurane, propofol, or isoflurane anesthesia among morbidly obese patients: a prospective, randomized study, Anesth Analg 2000
  11. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1097/00000539-200009000-00041 11.Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, Colnaghi E, Cedrati V, Torri G. Clinical assessment of target-controlled infusion of propofol during monitored anesthesia care, Can J Anaesth 1999
  12. http://dx.d0i.0rg/l 0.1007/BF03012602 PMid:10210047 1