Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Fonksiyonel endoskopik sinüs cerrahisinde kontrollü hipotansif anestezi: deksmedetomidin ve remifentalinin karşılaştırılması

Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotensive anesthesia in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Pages
257–261
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Heart rate was lower in Group D than Group R at the time of extubation and 5, 10, 15, 20, 30. min after extubation (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: During functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), sufficient control of bleeding is essential in order to increase the visibility in the operative field and reduce the risk of injury to the optic nerve or internal carotid artery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Fifty ASA I-II patients, aged between 18-60 years, undergoing elective FESS, were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Heart rate was lower in Group D than Group R at the time of extubation and 5, 10, 15, 20, 30. min after extubation (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: During functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), sufficient control of bleeding is essential in order to increase the visibility in the operative field and reduce the risk of injury to the optic nerve or internal carotid artery. However, choosing the ideal agent is still a controversial topic. The aim of this study is to compare the effects and possible side effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in FESS. Methods: Fifty ASA I-II patients, aged between 18-60 years, undergoing elective FESS, were included. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n=25) as Group R (remifentanil infusion, 0.25 mcg kg-1h-1) and Group D (dexmedetomidine infusion, 0.2-0.7 mcg kg-1 min-1). The duration of anesthe- sia, surgery and controlled hypotension, total drug doses, dryness of the surgical area, recovery time, side effects, liver and kidney function analyses were recorded. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in operation time, duration of anesthesia and controlled hypotension time. Group R and D were similar in average SpO2, dryness, arterial blood pressure, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine at all measurement times. Heart rate was lower in Group D than Group R at the time of extubation and 5, 10, 15, 20, 30. min after extubation (p

Özet

Amaç: Fonksiyonel endoskopik sinüs cerrahisi (FESS) sırasında kanamanın kontrol altına alınması; cerrahi alandaki görüşün artması ile birlikte, optik sinir veya internal karotis arteri gibi önemli yapıların yaralanması riskini de azaltmaktadır. Ancak, bu amaç için ideal ajan seçimi tartışmalı bir konu olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, FESS için kontrollü hipotansiyon uygulamalarında remifentanil ile deksmedetomidinin etkinlikleri ile gelişebilecek yan etkilerinin karşılaştırılmaası amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, elektif FESS cerrahisi geçirecek, ASA I-II, 18-60 yaş ara- sında 50 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar randomize olarak, Grup R (remifentanil infüzyonu, 0,25 mcg kg-1s-1, n=25) ve Grup D (deksmedetomidin infüzyonu, 0,2-0,7 mcg kg-1dk-1) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. İlaç enjeksiyonundan, hedeflenen kan basıncının oluşmasına kadar geçen süre, anestezi ve cerrahi süreleri, verilen toplam ilaç miktarı, cerrahi sahanın kuruluğu, derlenme süresi, yan etkiler ile karaciğer ve böbrek işlevlerine ait değerler kaydedildi. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında anestezi, cerrahi işlem süresi ve kontrollü hipotansiyon süresi bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu. Ortalama periferik oksijen satürasyonu, cerrahi sahanın kuruluğu, kan basınçları, aspartat aminotransferaz (AST), alanin aminotransferaz (ALT), kan üre nitrojeni (BUN) ve kreatinin değerleri karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı. Kalp atım hızı, ekstübasyon sırasında, ekstübasyondan sonra 5, 10, 15, 20 ve 30. dakikalarda Grup Dde Grup Rden anlamlı olarak düşüktü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜSLÜ, H., SARAÇOĞLU, A., ÖZCAN, A. A., ERKAL, H., TEMİZEL, F., ÖZYURT, Y., ARSLAN, G. (2022). Fonksiyonel endoskopik sinüs cerrahisinde kontrollü hipotansif anestezi: deksmedetomidin ve remifentalinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 257–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/619817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ankichetty SP, Ponniah M, Cherian V, Thomas S, Kumar K, Jeslin L, et al. Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and inhalational anesthesia using isoflurane for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011; 27: 328-32. [CrossRef ] 2.Al-Mujaini A, Wali U, Alkhabori M. Functional endoscopic sinus sur- gery: indications and complications in the ophthalmic field. Oman Med J 2009; 24: 70-80. 3.Leykin Y, Casati A, Rapotec A, Dal Sasso M, Barzan L, Fanelli G, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between pare- coxib and ketorolac for early postoperative analgesia following nasal surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2008; 74: 475-9. 4.Re M, Massegur H, Magliulo G, Ferrante L, Sciarretta V, Farneti G, et al. Traditional endonasal and microscopic sinus surgery complica- tions versus endoscopic sinussurgery complications: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269: 721-9. [CrossRef ] 5.Jacobi K, Rickauer AJ. Prophylactic analgesia in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Hemodynamics, surgical conditions, stress response. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1999; 34: 278-87. [CrossRef] 6.Drozdowski A, Sieśkiewicz A, Siemiatkowski A. Reduction of intraop- erative bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Anestezjol Intens Ter 2011; 43: 45-50. 7.Papalia R, Simone G, Ferriero M, Costantini M, Guaglianone S, Forastiere E, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy with controlled hy- potensive anesthesia to avoid hilar clamping: feasibility, safety and perioper- ative functional outcomes. J Urol 2012; 187: 1190-4. [CrossRef] 8.Chen CM, Lai SS, Hsu KJ, Lee HE, Huang HL. Assessment of the re- lated factors of blood loss and blood ingredients among patients under hypotensive anesthesia in orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22: 1594-7. [CrossRef ] 9.Rossi A, Falzetti G, Donati A, Orsetti G, Pelaia P. Desflurane versus sevoflurane to reduce blood loss in maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxil- lofac Surg 2010; 68: 1007-12. [CrossRef ] 10.Standing JF, Hammer GB, Sam WJ, Drover DR. Pharmacokinetic-phar- macodynamic modeling of the hypotensive effect of remifentanil in infants undergoing cranioplasty. Paediatr Anaesth 2010; 20: 7-18. [CrossRef] 11.Yosry M, Othman IS. Controlled hypotension in adults undergoing choroidal melanoma resection: comparison between the efficacy of nitroprusside and magnesium sulphate. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 891-6. [C