SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of parasacral and posterior sciatic nerve blocks combined with lumbar plexus block

Lomber pleksus bloğuyla kombine edilen parasakral ve posterior siyatik sinir blok tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması

İsmail GÖKYAR
Ertan ÖZTÜRK
Avni BABACAN
Kadir KAYA
Hülya ÇELEBİ
Berrin GÜNAYDIN
Pages
171–174
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The obturator nerve motor block success rate was found to be 80% (16/20) in Group I, whereas it was 10% (2/20) in Group II (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of parasacral and posterior Winnie approaches when combined with the inguinal paravascular approach for lumbar plexus block.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: After the approval of the Ethics Committee, 40 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The obturator nerve motor block success rate was found to be 80% (16/20) in Group I, whereas it was 10% (2/20) in Group II (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of parasacral and posterior Winnie approaches when combined with the inguinal paravascular approach for lumbar plexus block. Methods: After the approval of the Ethics Committee, 40 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups in a double-blind manner to perform sciatic nerve block either by the parasacral technique (Group I) or by the posterior approach (Group II). Results: The obturator nerve motor block success rate was found to be 80% (16/20) in Group I, whereas it was 10% (2/20) in Group II (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı lomber pleksus bloğunda kullanılan inguinal paravasküler yaklaşımın, siyatik siniri bloke etmek için kullanılan parasakal veya posterior Winnie yaklaşımıyla kombinasyonun klinik etkilerini karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Etik komite izni alındıktan sonra diz artroskopisi geçirecek 40 hasta, çift kör olarak parasakral teknik (Grup I) ya da posterior yaklaşımla Grup II) siyatik sinir bloğu yapmak için rasgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Obturator sinir motor blok başarı oranının Grup Ide %80 16/20) iken Grup IIde %10 (2/20) olduğu saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKYAR, İ., ÖZTÜRK, E., BABACAN, A., KAYA, K., ÇELEBİ, H., GÜNAYDIN, B. (2022). Comparison of parasacral and posterior sciatic nerve blocks combined with lumbar plexus block. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 171–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/619739

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Cousins MD, Briderbaugh PO. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1998, 373-94. Balas GI. In defense of the 3-in-1 block. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 244. Cauhe’pe C, Olivier M, Colombani R, Railhac N. Le bloc “troisen- un”: mythe ou re’alite ́? The “3-in-1” block: myth or reality? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1989; 8: 376-8. Mansur NY. 3-in-1 or 4-in-1? Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 242-3. Winnie AP. The 3-in-1 block. Is it really 4-in-1 or 2-in-1? Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 176-9. Mansur NY. Reevaluating the sciatic nevre block: Another landmark for consideration. Reg Anesth 1993; 18: 322-3.
  2. Morris GF, Lang SA, Dust WN, Van der Wal M. The parasacral sciatic nerve block. Reg Anesth 1997; 22: 223-8. [CrossRef] Winnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z. The inguinal paravascular technic of lomber plexus anesthesia: the “3-in-1 block”. Anesth Analg 1973; 52: 989-96. [CrossRef] Winnie AP. Regional anesthesia. Surg Clin North Am 1975; 55: 861- 92. Parkinson SK, Mueller JB, Little WL, Bailey SL. Extent of blockade with various approaches to the lomber plexus. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 243-8. [CrossRef] Jochum D, Iohom G, Choquet O, Macalou D, Ouologuem S, Meuret P, et al. Adding a selective obturator nerve block to the parasacral sciatic nerve block: an evaluation. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1544-9. [CrossRef] Aissaoui Y, Serghini I, Qamous Y, Seddiki, R, Zoubir M, Boughalem M. The parasacral sciatic nerve block does not induce anesthesia of the obturator nerve. J Anesth 2013; 27: 66-71. [CrossRef] Valade N, Ripart J, Nouvellon E, Cuvillon P, Prat-Pradal D, Lefrant JY, et al. Does sciatic parasacral injection spread to the obturator nerve? An anatomic study. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 664-7. [CrossRef] Elmas C, Elmas Y, Gautschi P, Uehlinger P. Kombinierter ischiadicus 3-in-1 block: Anwendung bei orthopadischen operationen im unter- schenkelbereich. Anaesthesist 1992; 41: 639-43.
  3. Fredrickson MJ, Abeysekera A, White R. Randomized study of the ef- fect of local anesthetic volume and concentration on the duration of peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012; 37: 495-501. [CrossRef] Fredrickson MJ, White R, Danesh-Clough TK. Low-volume ultra- sound-guided nerve block provides inferior postoperative analgesia compared to a higher-volume landmark technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: 393-8. [CrossRef] Jochum D, O’neil T, Jabbour H, Diarra PD, Cuiget-Pourel E, Bouaziz H. Evaluation of femoral nevre blockade following inguinal paravas-