SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Adaptation of The Nursing Decision Making Instrument to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Hemşire Karar Verme Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Şeyma DEMİR
Arzu AKMAN YILMAZ
Pages
407–417
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish Nurse Decision-Making Instrument can be used as an assessment tool that reflects the decision-making processes of nurses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Nurse Decision-Making Instrument.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The data of the methodological study was obtained from 215 nurses working in two public hospitals in Bolu.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish Nurse Decision-Making Instrument can be used as an assessment tool that reflects the decision-making processes of nurses.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Nurse Decision-Making Instrument. Method: The data of the methodological study was obtained from 215 nurses working in two public hospitals in Bolu. The psycholinguistic and psychometric properties of the DecisionMaking Instrument were examined in the study. Results: Goodness-of-fit index results of confirmatory factor analysis did not confirm the previously assumed four-factor model in the sample. As a result of the Explanatory Factor Analysis, since some items were not included in their factor group, the scale was accepted as one-dimensional. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was .97. Conclusion: The Turkish Nurse Decision-Making Instrument can be used as an assessment tool that reflects the decision-making processes of nurses.

Özet

Amaç: Hemşire Karar Verme Ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlayarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğini belirlemektir. Yöntem: Metodolojik türdeki araştırmanın verileri Bolu’da bulunan iki kamu hastanesinde çalışmakta olan 215 hemşireden elde edilmiştir. Araştırmada Hemşire Karar Verme Ölçeğinin psikolinguistik ve psikometrik özellikleri incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin uyum iyiliği indeksi sonuçları, önceden varsayılmış dört faktörlü modeli örneklemde doğrulamamıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda iki faktörlü yapı ortaya çıkmış, bazı maddeler kendi faktör grubunda yer almadığından ölçek tek boyutlu olarak kabul edilmiştir. Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa katsayısı ,97 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Türkçe Hemşire Karar Verme Ölçeği hemşirelerin karar verme süreçlerini yansıtan bir değerlendirme aracı olarak kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, Ş., YILMAZ, A. A. (2022). Adaptation of The Nursing Decision Making Instrument to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 407–417. https://ajindex.com/articles/590329

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aker, S., Dündar, C. & Pekşen, Y. (2005). Ölçme araçlarında iki yaşamsal kavram: geçerlik ve güvenirlik: derleme. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 22(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.5835/jecm.v22i1.86
  2. Chen, S. L., Hsu, H. Y., Chang, C. & Lin, E. C. (2016). An exploration of the correlates of nurse practitioners’ clinical decision-making abilities. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25, 1016-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13136
  3. Cone, K. J. (2000). The development and testing of an instrument to measure decision making ın emergency department triage nurses (Doctoral dissertation). Saint Louis University, Missouri. https://www.proquest.com/docview/230759761
  4. Çelik, H. E. & Yılmaz, V. (2016). LISREL 9.1 ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: Temel kavramlar-uygulamalar-programlama. Ankara, Türkiye: Anı Yayıncılık. Çetin, S. & Aydemir, T. (2019). Bilim ve felsefe ışığında klinik karar verme. Journal of Anatolian Medical Research, 4(3), 116-122.
  5. Denis, D. J. (2016). Applied univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/abant/reader.action?docID=4338227&ppg=5
  6. Deniz, M. E. (2004). Investigation of the relation between decision making self- esteem, decision making style and problem solving skills of university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 4(15), 23-35.
  7. Dickson, G. L. & Flynn, L. (2012). Nurses’ clinical reasoning: processes and practices of medication safety. Qualitative Health Research, 22(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420448
  8. Edeer, A. D. & Sarıkaya, A. (2015). Adaptation of clinical decision making in nursing scaleto undergraduate students of nursing: The study of reliability and validity. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2015.03.001
  9. Ferrell, B. R., Eberts, M. T., McCaffery, M. & Grant, M. (2012). The Clinical Decision Making Survey (CDMS). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. www.midss.ie. Gilbert, G. E. & Prion, S. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement: Lawshe’s content validity index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 530-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002
  10. Heale, R. & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based Nursing, 18(3), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
  11. Jenkins, H. (1983). Perceptions of decision making among baccalaureate nursing students as measured by the clinic