SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 28

Primary teachers candidates' views on good teacher

Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının iyi öğretmen olma ile ilgili görüşleri

Behiye UBUZ
Sibel SARI
Pages
53–61
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although opinions about being a good teacher were categorized into six subtitles: personal characteristics, knowledge of subject and its teaching;, skills, professional growth, appreciation, and commitment to the mission, most of the answers were about different dimensions of personal characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to examine qualitatively 109 third year primary teacher candidates’ views on being a good teacher.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One open-ended question was posed to teacher candidates to be answered in writing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although opinions about being a good teacher were categorized into six subtitles: personal characteristics, knowledge of subject and its teaching;, skills, professional growth, appreciation, and commitment to the mission, most of the answers were about different dimensions of personal characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine qualitatively 109 third year primary teacher candidates’ views on being a good teacher. One open-ended question was posed to teacher candidates to be answered in writing. Although opinions about being a good teacher were categorized into six subtitles: personal characteristics, knowledge of subject and its teaching;, skills, professional growth, appreciation, and commitment to the mission, most of the answers were about different dimensions of personal characteristics.

Özet

Bu çalışma, sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının iyi öğretmen olma ile ilgili görüşlerini araştıran nitel bir çalışmadır. Gazi Üniversitesinde ikinci öğretimde okumakta olan 109 3.sınıf öğretmen adayına açık uçlu bir soru yanıtlanmak üzere verilmiştir. İyi öğretmen olma ile ilgili görüşler kişisel karakteristikler, konu ve konu anlatımına hakimlik, beceriler, profesyonel gelişim, takdir edilme ve görev yükümlülüğü başlıkları altında toplanmış olmasına rağmen verilen yanıtların çoğunluğu kişisel karakteristiklerin farklı boyutları altında toplanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UBUZ, B., SARI, S. (2022). Primary teachers candidates' views on good teacher. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 28, 53–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/585161

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akyüz, Y. (1978). Türkiye deki öğretmenlerin toplumsal değişmedeki etkileri. Ankara:
  2. Doğan Basımevi. Berliner, D. (1987a). Simple views of effective teaching and a simple theory of classroom instruction. D. C. Berliner ve B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to Teacher. New York: Random House. Berliner, D. C. (1987b). But do they understand? Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educator’s handbook: A research perspective. New York: Longman Brophy, J.E., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for analysis and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 9-23.
  3. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999). Supporting teachers’ learning in social and institutional contexts. In Fou-Lai Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Mathematics Teacher Education (7-77). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University Cruickshank, D., Bainer D., & Metcalf. K. (1995).
  4. The act of teaching. Mcgraw-Hill, Inc. Cruickshank, D.R., & Heafele, D. (2001). Good teachers, plural. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 26-30.
  5. Ekiz, D. (2003). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmen eğitimindeki modeller hakkında düşünceleri. Milli Eğitim, 158, 146-160.
  6. Evertson, C., Andarson, L., & Brophy, J. (1978). Texas junior high school study: final report of process outcome relationship (Vol.1. Report No. 4061). Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas. Göksugüzel, L. (2000). Öğretmen yetiştirmede sosyal beceri eğitiminde rehberlik. II. Ulusal Öğretmen Yetiştirme Sempozyumu (581-583),
  7. Çanakkale. Hamachek, D. (1995). Psychology in teaching, learning and growth. Mass: Allyn and Bacon. Hidget, G. (1957). The art of teaching. New York: Vintage Books Kane, P. R., & Temple, E. (1997). Who is a good teacher? who is a good school head? Independent School, 56(3), 50-57.
  8. Kavcar, C. (1999). Nitelikli öğretmen sorunu. Eğitimde yansımalar V. 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Eğitim Sistemi Ulusal Sempozyumu. Ankara.
  9. Kızıltepe, Z. (2002). İyi ve etkili öğretmen. Eğitim ve Bilim, 27, 10-14.
  10. McDonald, F. (1975). Research on teaching and its implications for policy making: Report on phase II of the beginning teachers evaluation study. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü. (2006). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlilikleri. Temel Eğitime Destek Projesi “Öğretmen Eğitimi Bileşeni”. Murray, H. G. (1983). Low inference classroom teaching behavior and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educ