SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mülkiye Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 268

Social dimension of energy and chocies of Turkish public

Enerjinin toplumsal boyutu ve Türk halkının enerji tercihleri

Volkan Ş. EDIGER
Çiğdem KENTMEN
Pages
281–300
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, Turkish public is not very knowledgeable about energy resources, especially about nuclear energy and wishes government to provide them with more information.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines Turkish public's energy preferences under three headings, including future energy, energy efficiency, and renewable energy resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using the related data from the 2005 and 2006 Eurobarometer surveys, this study found that Turkish citizens are highly supportive of solar and nuclear energy but they are not ready to pay more for energy incentives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, Turkish public is not very knowledgeable about energy resources, especially about nuclear energy and wishes government to provide them with more information.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines Turkish public's energy preferences under three headings, including future energy, energy efficiency, and renewable energy resources. Using the related data from the 2005 and 2006 Eurobarometer surveys, this study found that Turkish citizens are highly supportive of solar and nuclear energy but they are not ready to pay more for energy incentives. Also, Turkish public is not very knowledgeable about energy resources, especially about nuclear energy and wishes government to provide them with more information.

Özet

Bu çalışma Türk toplumunun enerji tercihlerini, geleceğin enerjisi, enerji verimliliği ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları başlıkları altında incelemektedir. 2005-2006 yıllarında AB tarafından düzenlenmiş üç farklı Avrobarometre anketinin enerjiyle ilgili bölümlerinin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Türk halkı güneş ve nükleer enerjiye hayli destek vermektedir fakat enerji verimliliğinin ve yenilenebilir enerjinin payının artırılması için gerekli olan teşviklerin maddi yükünü üstlenmeye razı değildir. Bunun yanı sıra, Türk toplumunda enerji kaynakları konusunda ciddi eksikliği bulunmaktadır ve hükümetin kendisine daha çok bilgi sağlamasını talep etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EDIGER, V. Ş., KENTMEN, Ç. (2022). Social dimension of energy and chocies of Turkish public. Mülkiye Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 268, 281–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/583999

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Carrera, Diana ve Alexander Mack (2010). "Sustainability Essessment of Energy Technologies via Social Indicators: Results of a Survey Among European Energy Experts," Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 2, s. 1030-1039.
  2. Darby, Sarah (2006). "Social Learning and Public Policy: Lessons from an Energy-Conscious Village," Energy Policy, C. 34, S. 17, 2929-2940.
  3. Ediger, Volkan Ş. ve Elçin Kentel (1999). "Renewable Energy Potential as an Alternative to Fossil Fuels in Turkey," Energy Conversion and Management, C. 40, S. 7, s. 743-755.
  4. Ediger, Volkan Ş. ve Hüseyin Tatlıdil (2006). "Energy as an Indicator of Human Development: A Statistical Approach," Journal of Energy and Development, C. 31, S. 2, s. 213-232.
  5. Gambro, John ve Harvey N. Swiztky (1999). "Variables Associated with American High School Students' Knowledge of Environmental Issues Related to Energy and Pollution," Journal of Environmental Education, C, 30, S. 2, s.15-23.
  6. Gnansounou, Edgard (2010). "Vulnerability of the Economy to the Potential Disturbances of Energy Supply: A Logic-Based Model with Application to the Case of China," Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 6, 2846-2857.
  7. Greenberg, Michael (2009). "Energy Sources, Public Policy and Public Preferences," Energy Policy, C. 37, S. 8, s. 3242-3249. Hürriyet, "Bakan'dan Nükleer Üniversite Teklifi," http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=l5493445, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010). Hürriyet, "Nükleere Karşı Cazlı Protesto," aspx?id=14610955, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010). Hürriyet, "Çernobil Kazasının 24. Yılı,' aspx?id=14519476, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  8. Goldemberg, Jose, Thomas Johansson, Amulya K.H. Reddy ve Robert H. Williams (1985). "An End-Use Oriented Global Energy Strategy," Annual Review of Energy, C. 10, s. 613-688.
  9. Jun, Eunju, Won Joon Kim, Yong Hoon Jeong ve Soon Heung Chang (2010). "Measuring the Social Value of Nuclear Energy Using Contingent Valuation Methodology," Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 3, s. 1470-1476.
  10. Kaldellis, John (2005). "Social Attitude towards Wind Energy Applications in Greece," Energy Policy, C. 33, S. 5, s. 595-602.
  11. Kıvanç, Ahmet, "Nükleer Kapıya Dayandı," Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx7aT ype=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=831024&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=97 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  12. Kıvanç, Ahmet, "TAEK'ten Nükleer Güvence," Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx? aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=831214&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=97 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  13. Krugmann, Hartmut ve Jose Goldemberg (198