Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

A SURVEY TO DETERMINE FACTORS AFFECTING PROFESSI- ONAL JUDGMENT ABILITY ON INDEPENDENT AUDIT

BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE MESLEKİ MUHAKEME BECERİSİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN TESPİT EDİLMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA*

Pages
525–538
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, according to our results, independent auditors need professional judgment skills at most in one of the auditing steps "determining the materiality level".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Independent Auditing Standards require professional judgment to execute audit activities in accordance with the essence of the audit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with aforesaid purpose, a survey was conducted on representatives of 172 independent audit firms authorized by Public Oversight Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, according to our results, independent auditors need professional judgment skills at most in one of the auditing steps "determining the materiality level".
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Independent Auditing Standards require professional judgment to execute audit activities in accordance with the essence of the audit. In this context, the aim of this study is determining materiality levels of factors affecting professional judgment skills and identifying the frequency of professional judgment skills used at what stages in the process of auditing. In line with aforesaid purpose, a survey was conducted on representatives of 172 independent audit firms authorized by Public Oversight Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority. As a result of the study, the most important factors that have impacts on professional judgment skill are determined to be independence, experience and objectivity, respectively. In addition, according to our results, independent auditors need professional judgment skills at most in one of the auditing steps "determining the materiality level".

Özet

Bağımsız Denetim Standartları, denetim faaliyetlerinin özüne uygun şekilde yürütülebilmesi için mesleki muhakemeyi şart koşmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacını, mesleki muhakeme becerisi üzerinde etkili olan faktörlerin önemlilik düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve denetim faaliyeti sürecinde mesleki muhakeme becerisinin hangi aşamada hangi sıklıkta kullanıldığının tespit edilmesi oluşturmaktadır. Söz konusu amaç doğrultusunda, KGK tarafından yetkilendirilmiş 172 bağımsız denetim firması yetkilisi üzerinde anket çalışması yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, mesleki muhakeme becerisi üzerinde etkili olan en önemli faktörlerin sırasıyla bağımsızlık, tecrübe ve objektiflik olduğu ve bağımsız denetçilerin muhakeme becerilerine denetim süreci aşamalarından en çok "önemlilik düzeyinin belirlenmesi" faaliyetinde ihtiyaç duydukları tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANÇ, A., GÜMRAH, A. (2022). A SURVEY TO DETERMINE FACTORS AFFECTING PROFESSI- ONAL JUDGMENT ABILITY ON INDEPENDENT AUDIT. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 525–538. https://ajindex.com/articles/582411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Anderson, AW. 2012. The Characteristics Of A Successful Auditor, Kansas So- ciety of CPAs. Bağımsız Denetim Standardı 200 (BDS 200), http://www.kgk.gov.tr/contents/ files/BDS/ BDS_200.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2015). Bağımsız Denetim Standardı 220 (BDS 220), http://www.kgk.gov.tr/contents/ files/BDS/ BDS_220.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2015). Bağımsız Denetim Standardı 500 (BDS 500), http://www.kgk.gov.tr/contents/ files/BDS/ BDS_500.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2015).
  2. Bhattacharjee, S., K.K. Moreno. 2013. The Role of Auditors' Emotions and Moods on Audit Judgment: A Research Summary with Suggested Practice Implications, American Accounting Association, 7, 2. Crous, C., J. Lamprecht, A. Eilifsen, W. Messier, S. Glover ve D. Prawitt. 2012.
  3. Auditing and Assurance Services, McGraw-Hill Education. Danescua, T., A. Chira. 2014. Professional Judgment And Reticence To Apply Sampling Techniques, 15. Erdoğan, N., S. Uludağ. 2014. Denetçi Yargısının Nesnelleştirilmesinde Kulla- nılabilecek Başlıca Yöntemler ve Bayes Yaklaşımı, Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, 14, 42. Hunton, A.G, E. James ve MI. Gomaa. 2009. The Impact of Client and Auditor Gender on Auditors Judgements, Accounting Horizons, 23, 1. Kamu Gözetim Kurumu (KGK), www.kgk.gov.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 04.04.2015).
  4. Kızılgöl, Ö., B. İşgüden. 2011. Denetim Riskinin Belirlenmesinde Mesleki Yargının Denetçiler Tarafından Kullanılması, World Of Accounting Sci- ence, 13, 4. Laitinen, E.K., T. Laitinen. 2015. A probability tree model of audit quality, European Journal of Operational Research, 243, 2. Mala, R., P. Chand. 2015. Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Audi- ting and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective, Accounting Perspectives, 14, 1. Manita, R., H. Lahbari ve N. Elommal. 2011. The Impact of Qualitative Fac- tors on Ethical Judgments of Materiality: An Experimental Study with Au- ditors, International Journal Of Business, 16, 3. Mircea, M., B. Ghilic-Micu ve M. Stoica. 2012. Information Audit For Deci- sion Processes, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 46, 3. Moroney, R., F. Campbell, J. Hamilton ve V. Warren. 2012. Auditing: A Prac- tical Approach, John Wiley & Sons Canada, Limited. Morrill, J. 1996. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Professional Judgment and the Auditor, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1. Professional Judgment Resource (PJR) 2014. http://www.thecaq.org/docs/ reports-and-publications/professional-judgmen