Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL STRESS ON THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION

FİNANSAL STRESİN MUHASEBE VERİLERİNİN DEĞER İLİŞKİSİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
22–47
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The latter indicates that book value of equity does not serve a proxy for liquidation and it is interpreted as the inability of book value of equity to measure the net value of resources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Our study analyses the impact of financial stress measured by Ohlson’s O-Score on the value relevance of earnings and book value of equity by employing a sample of listed firms on Borsa Istanbul between 2009 and 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Outcomes obtained by using a modified Price Model reveal that the valuation effectiveness of earnings decreases while that of book value of equity remains unchanged as financial stress decreases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The latter indicates that book value of equity does not serve a proxy for liquidation and it is interpreted as the inability of book value of equity to measure the net value of resources.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Stres · Ohlson · O-Skoru

Abstract

Our study analyses the impact of financial stress measured by Ohlson’s O-Score on the value relevance of earnings and book value of equity by employing a sample of listed firms on Borsa Istanbul between 2009 and 2018. Outcomes obtained by using a modified Price Model reveal that the valuation effectiveness of earnings decreases while that of book value of equity remains unchanged as financial stress decreases. In other words, the value relevance of earnings is moderated or negatively influenced as financial stress decreases and the value relevance of book value of equity is independent of financial stress. The former confirms the expectation of the decreased role of the income statement in valuation as financial stress decreases. The latter indicates that book value of equity does not serve a proxy for liquidation and it is interpreted as the inability of book value of equity to measure the net value of resources.

Özet

Çalışmamızda Ohlson’un O-Skoru Yöntemi ile hesaplanan finansal stresin, defter değerinin ve kazançların değer ilişkisine etkileri Borsa İstanbul’a 2009-2018 arasında kote olan firmalara ilişkin bir örneklem ile analiz edilmektedir. Fiyat Modelinin modifiye edilmiş versiyonu kullanılarak elde edilen sonuçlar, finansal stres arttıkça kazançların değerleme etkinliğinin azaldığını ve finansal stresin defter değerinin değerleme etkinliği üzerinde herhangi bir etkisinin bulunmadığını göstermektedir. Diğer bir deyişle finansal stres kazançların değer ilişkisini negatif yönde etkilemekte iken defter değerinin değer ilişkisini değiştirmemektedir. Kazançlara ilişkin sonuç, finansal stres arttıkça gelir tablosunun değerlemedeki etkinliğinin azalması beklentisini doğrular mahiyettedir. Defter değerine ilişkin sonuç ise defter değerinin tasfiye değeri olarak değerlemede kullanılmadığına işaret etmekte ve defter değerinin kaynakların net değerini ölçemediği şeklinde yorumlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUĞRUL, M. (2022). THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL STRESS ON THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 22–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/582095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, J., Hayunga, D., Mansi, S., Reeb, D. ve Verardi, V. 2019. “Identifying and Treating Outliers in Finance”, Financial Management, 48(2), 345–384.
  2. Altman, E.I. 1968. “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy”, The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.
  3. Ates, S. 2020. “Membership of Sustainability Index in an Emerging Market: Implications for Sustainability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119465. Ball, R. ve Brown, P. 1968. “An Empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers”, Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159–178.
  4. Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H. ve Landsman, W.R. 1996. “Valuation characteristics of equity book value and net income: Tests of the Abandonment Option Hypothesis”, Working Paper. Stanford University. Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H. ve Landsman, W.R. 1998. “Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(1), 1–34.
  5. Beaver, W.H. 1968. “The information content of annual announcements earnings”, Journal of Accounting Research, 6(3), 67–92.
  6. Beaver, W.H. 2002. “Perspectives on recent capital market research”, The Accounting Review, 77(2), 453–474.
  7. Bilgic, F.A., Ho, S., Hodgson, A. ve Xiong, Z. 2018. “Do macro-economic crises determine accounting value relevance?”, Accounting in Europe, 15(3), 402–422.
  8. Brown, S., Lo, K. ve Lys, T. 1999. “Use of R2 in accounting research: Measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2), 83–115.
  9. Burgstahler, D.C. ve Dichev, I.D. 1997. “Earnings, adaptation and equity value”, The Accounting Review, 72(2), 187–215.
  10. Callao, S., Cimini, R. ve Jarne, J.I. 2016. “Value relevance of accounting figures in presence of earnings management. Are enforcement and ownership diffusion really enough?”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 1286–1299.
  11. Chang, C., Herbohn, K. ve Tutticci, I. 2009. “Market’s perception of deferred tax accruals”, Accounting and Finance, 49(4), 645–673.
  12. Charitou, A., Neophytou, E. ve Charalambous, C. 2004. “Predicting corporate failure: Empirical evidence for the UK”, European Accounting Review, 13(3), 465–497.
  13. Chieng, J.R. 2013. “Verifying the validity of Altman’s Z-Score as a predictor of bank failures in the case of the Eurozone (Unpublished Masters Thesis)”, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. Christensen, H.B. ve Nikolaev, V.V. 2012. “Capital versus performance covenants in debt contracts