SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mali Çözüm / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 155

A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

KAPSAMLI GELİRİN DEĞER İLİŞKİSİNE YÖNELİK ULUSLARARASI LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

MELİK ERTUĞRUL
Pages
55–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to shed light on the current picture of the literature for the future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this literature review study, 25 quantitative articles studying the value relevance of comprehensive income are analysed by considering their general traits, models and variables employed, and methods to deal with heteroscedasticity and endogeneity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of studies analysing the value relevance of comprehensive income becomes very apparent beginning from 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to shed light on the current picture of the literature for the future research.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this literature review study, 25 quantitative articles studying the value relevance of comprehensive income are analysed by considering their general traits, models and variables employed, and methods to deal with heteroscedasticity and endogeneity. The number of studies analysing the value relevance of comprehensive income becomes very apparent beginning from 2015. Furthermore, since there is only one article presenting outcomes by employing a dataset belonging to several countries, there is a huge gap andpotential of the literature on studies presenting international evidence. This literature review study also reports that the literature extensively i) employs the Return Model, ii) measures the market price at the end of the fiscal year end, and iii) does not point out concerns regarding heteroscedasticity and endogeneity. This study aims to shed light on the current picture of the literature for the future research.

Özet

Bu literatür taramasında Web of Science veri tabanında yer alan ve kapsamlı gelirin değer ilişkisini analiz eden 25 sayısal makale incelenerek ve bu makalelere ilişkin genel özellikler, modeller, değişkenler, değişken varyans ve dışlanmış değişken yanlılığı sorununa yönelik kullanılan yöntemler irdelenmektedir. Kapsamlı gelirin değer ilişkisi perspektifinden analizi konusunun akademik literatürdeki yerinin özellikle 2015 ve sonrasında daha belirgin bir hale geldiği anlaşılmaktadır. Ayrıca, yalnızca bir makalenin birden fazla ülkeye ait veri setini kullanarak bulgular sunması, literatürün bu alandaki boşluğuna ve potansiyeline işaret etmektedir. Bu literatür taraması çalışması, analiz konusu makalelerin ağırlıklı olarak Getiri Modeli perspektifinden konuya yaklaştığını, piyasa verisine ilişkin ölçüm fiyatı olarak finansal yıl sonu kapanış fiyatını kullandığını ve değişken varyans ile dışlanmış değişken yanlılığı sorunlarına yönelik çekinceler sunmadığını ortaya koyarak gelecek araştırmalar için ışık tutmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUĞRUL, M. (2019). A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. Mali Çözüm, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 155, 55–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/281601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Amir, E., Harris, T. S. and Venuti, E. K. (1993). A comparison of the valuerelevance of U.S. versus Non-U.S. GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting Research 31, 230–264.
  2. Amri-Asrami, M., Aghaei, M.A., Azar, A. and Sepasi, S. (2017). Value relevance of information in transaction-based accounting vs. fair value accounting for equity valuation. Revista QUID (Special Issue), 54–64.
  3. Anandarajan, A., Hasan, I., Isik, I. and McCarthy, C. (2006). The Role of Earnings and Book Values in Pricing Stocks: Evidence from Turkey. Advances in International Accounting 19, 59–89.
  4. Ball, R. ve Brown, P. (1968). An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6(2), 159–178.
  5. Banks, L., Hodgson, A. ve Russell, M. (2018). The location of comprehensive income reporting – does it pass the financial analyst revision test? Accounting Research Journal 31(4), 531–550.
  6. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H. ve Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31(1–3), 77–104.
  7. Bartolucci, F., Belotti, F. ve Peracchi, F. (2015). Linear models for panel data Testing for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity in generalized linear models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics 184(1), 111–123.
  8. Barton, J., Hansen, T. B. ve Pownall, G. (2010). Which performance measures do investors around the world value the most-and why? Accounting Review 85(3), 753–789.
  9. Beaver, W. H. (1968). The Information Content of Annual Announcements Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 6(3), 67–92.
  10. Beaver, W. H. (2002). Perspectives on Recent Capital Market Research. Accounting Review 77(2), 453–474.
  11. Bhat, G. and Ryan, S. G. (2015). The impact of risk modeling on the market perception of banks’ estimated fair value gains and losses for financial instruments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 46, 81–95.
  12. Bischof, J. and Daske, H. (2016). Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS Endorsement Criteria: The Case of IFRS 9. Accounting in Europe 13(2), 129– 168. Brushwood, J. D., Johnston, D. and Kutcher, L. (2017). The Market Valuation of the Permanent Book-to-Tax Differences Generated by StockBased Compensation Awards. Journal of The Americal Taxation Association 39(2), 1–20.
  13. Campbell, J. L. (2015). The fair value of cash flow hedges, future profitability, and stock returns. Contemporary Accounting Research 32(1), 243–279.
  14. Chambers, D., Linsmeier, T.