Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Ce-Chirp Impulse Latency and Amplitude Values Between High Risk Prematures with Corrected Age of 0-6 Months and Healthy Newborns

Düzeltilmiş Yaşı 0-6 Ay Arası Yüksek Riskli Prematürelerde Ce-Chirp Uyaran Latans ve Amplitüd Değerlerinin Sağlıklı Yenidoğanlarla Karşılaştırılması

Pages
89–96
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Considering that auditory neural maturationpersisted up to 18 months, we obtained mean values that will help clinical interpretation ofhigh-risk premature infants and newborns by using the V wave latency and amplitude values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The obtained mean latency and amplitude values will help us for clinical interpretationof high risk prematüre infants and newborns’ ABR tests by using ce chirp impulse.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materialand Methods: In this study, 35 high-risk premature and 35 healthy newborns with a correctedage range of 0-6 months were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Considering that auditory neural maturationpersisted up to 18 months, we obtained mean values that will help clinical interpretation ofhigh-risk premature infants and newborns by using the V wave latency and amplitude values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The obtained mean latency and amplitude values will help us for clinical interpretationof high risk prematüre infants and newborns’ ABR tests by using ce chirp impulse. Materialand Methods: In this study, 35 high-risk premature and 35 healthy newborns with a correctedage range of 0-6 months were included. The wave latency and amplitude values in the auditorybrainstem response (ABR) test of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz using the narrow-band chirp stimuluswere compared in these two groups. Results: V-wave values obtained from all infants wereobtained at the highest amplitude (0.58 μV) at 90 dB at 1000 Hz and the shortest latency (3.73 ms)at 90 Hz at 2000 Hz in healthy newborn. There was no significant difference between V wave latencieswith regard to gender. In our study, as a result of V wave latency and amplitude measurementsobtained in comparison of high-risk premature and healthy newborns, a statisticallysignificant difference was found between all frequencies (500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) and narrowbandchirp stimulus between the two groups. Conclusion: Considering that auditory neural maturationpersisted up to 18 months, we obtained mean values that will help clinical interpretation ofhigh-risk premature infants and newborns by using the V wave latency and amplitude values.

Özet

Amaç: Belirlenen latans ve amplitüd değerleri, yüksek riskli prematürlerde ve yenidoğanlarda yapılacak ce chirp uyaranlı ABR ölçümlerinin değerlendirilmesinde yardımcı olacaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada işitme kaybı şikayeti olmayan ve otoskopik muayenesi normal olan, düzeltilmiş yaşı 0-6 ay arası 35 yüksek riskli prematüre, 35 sağlıklı yenidoğan olmak üzere iki grupta bulunan toplam 70 bebeğin 500, 1000, 2000 ve 4000 Hz’deki ve dar bant chirp uyaran kullanılarak yapılan işitsel beyin sapı cevabı (İBC) testindeki dalga latans ve amplitüd değerleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Tüm bebeklerden elde edilen V. dalga değerlerinde en yüksek amplitüd (0,58 μV) 1000 Hz’de 90 dB şiddetinde, en kısa latans (3,73 msn) 2000 Hz’de 90 dB şiddetinde sağlıklı yenidoğanda elde edilmiştir. Cinsiyetlere göre yapılan değerlendirmede V. dalga latansları arasında anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır. Çalışmamızda yüksek riskli prematüre ve sağlıklı yenidoğanların karşılaştırılmasında elde edilen V. dalga latans ve amplitüd ölçümleri sonucunda tüm frekanslarda (500, 1000, 2000 ve 4000 Hz’deki) ve dar bant chirp uyaran ile iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı faklılık bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak işitsel nöral matürasyonun 18. aya kadar devam ettiği dikkate alındığında, çalışmamızda elde edilen V. dalga latans ve amplitüd değerlerinin yüksek riskli prematüreler ve yenidoğanlara ait klinik yorumda yardımcı olacak ortalama değerler elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBEK, H. S., BEYAZPINAR, G., SUNGUR, V. G. (2022). Comparison of Ce-Chirp Impulse Latency and Amplitude Values Between High Risk Prematures with Corrected Age of 0-6 Months and Healthy Newborns. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 89–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/576632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Arnold SA. Auditory: Diagnosis In: Roeser RJ, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, eds. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Medicak, Publishers Inc; 2000. p.451-70
  2. Sininger YS, Abdala C, Cone-Wesson B. Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res. 1997;104(1-2):27- 38. [Crossref] [PubMed] 3. Gorga MP, Johson TA, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KL, Garner CA, Neely ST. Using a combination of click and tone burst-evoked auditory brainstem response measurements to estimate pure tone thresholds. Ear Hear. 2006;27(1):60-74. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 4. Purdy SC, Abbas PJ. ABR thresholds to tone bursts gated with Blackman and linear windows in adults with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2002;23(4):358-68. [Crossref] [PubMed] 5. Seewaki RC. Frequency-specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplifiction: Proceedings of an International Conference. 1st ed. Switzerland: Phonac AG Press; 2000. p.13- 31
  3. Elberling C, Don M. Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived- band latencies in normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;124(5):3022- 37. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committe on Infant Hearing. Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4): 898-921. [Crossref] [PubMed] 8. American Academy of Audiology. Audiologic Guidelines for the assessment of hearing in infants and young children; 2012. p.52
  4. Katz J, Burkard R, Medwetsky L, Hood LJ. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p.1032
  5. Elberling C, Kristensen SG, Don M. Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 131(3):2091-100. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 11. Stuart A, Cobb KM. Effect of stimulus and number of sweeps on the neonate auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear. 2014;35(5): 585-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] 12. Cobb KM, Stuart A. Test-retest reliability of auditory brainstem responses to chirp stimüli in newborns. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(11):829-35. [Crossref] [PubMed] 13. Sininger YS, Don M. Effects of click rate and electrode orientation on theresh old of the auditory brainstem response. J Speech Hear Res. 1989;32(4):880-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] 14. Rowe MJ 3rd. The brainstem auditory evoked responsesin neurological disease: a rewiev. Ear Hear. 1981