SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Anatomic and functional results in tragal cartilage tympanoplasty in adults: Correlation with prognostic factors

Işılay ÖZ
Selim ERBEK
Levent Naci ÖZLÜOĞLU
Seyra Hatice ERBEK
Pages
78–84
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The average preoperative ABG,including all types of tympanoplasty operations was 40.20±17.3 dB, and postoperative ABG was 30.14±19.21 dB (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the graft success and functional results of cartilage island graft tympanoplasties performedin adult patients.Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients operated on for chronic otitis media at our clinic were reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One hundredand ninety-five patients (212 ears) older than 16 years of age that had undergone tympanoplasty operation and that had beenfollowed up for at least six months postoperatively, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The average preoperative ABG,including all types of tympanoplasty operations was 40.20±17.3 dB, and postoperative ABG was 30.14±19.21 dB (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the graft success and functional results of cartilage island graft tympanoplasties performedin adult patients.Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients operated on for chronic otitis media at our clinic were reviewed. One hundredand ninety-five patients (212 ears) older than 16 years of age that had undergone tympanoplasty operation and that had beenfollowed up for at least six months postoperatively, were included in the study. The prognostic factors that could have impact on graftsuccess were analyzed. The pure-tone average and postoperative gain in air-bone gap (ABG) were recorded as the mean of 0.5,1 and 2 kHz thresholds.Results: Graft success was achieved in 191 patients (90%), and graft perforation occurred in 21 patients (10%). When the riskfactors that might lead to graft perforation were analyzed separately, the presence of cholesteatoma (p=0.014), and not performingmastoidectomy during tympanoplasty (p=0.031) were significantly associated with graft perforation. The average preoperative ABG,including all types of tympanoplasty operations was 40.20±17.3 dB, and postoperative ABG was 30.14±19.21 dB (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, I., ERBEK, S., ÖZLÜOĞLU, L. N., ERBEK, S. H. (2022). Anatomic and functional results in tragal cartilage tympanoplasty in adults: Correlation with prognostic factors. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 78–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/597954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Zollner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the soundconducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 1955;69:637-52
  2. Wullstein HL. Functional Operations in the middle ear with split-thickness skin graft. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1952;161:422-35
  3. Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1844-56
  4. Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Oncel S, Songu M, Kopar A, Demiray U. Perichondrium/Cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;40:295-9
  5. Aidonis I, Robertson TC, Sismanis A. Cartilage shield tympanoplasty: a reliable technique. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:838-41
  6. Dornhoffer JL. Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006;39:1161-76
  7. Kyrodimos E, Sismanis A, Santos D. Type III cartilage “shield” tympanoplasty: an effective procedure for hearing improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:982-5
  8. Tos M. Cartilage Tympanoplasty. New York: Thieme; 2009
  9. Yung M. Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:663-72
  10. Goodhill V. Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1967;85:480-91
  11. Heermann J. Autograft tragal and conchal palisade cartilage and perichondrium in tympanomastoid reconstruction. Ear Nose Throat J 1992;71:344-9
  12. Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:386-90
  13. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. AmericanAcademy of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Ffoundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186-7
  14. Kerr AG, Byrne JE, Smyth GD. Cartilage homografts in the middle ear: a long-term histological study. J Laryngol Otol 1973;87:1193-9
  15. Yamamoto E, Iwanaga M, Fukumoto M. Histologic study of homograft cartilages implanted in the middle ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;98:546-51
  16. Levinson RM. Cartilage-perichondrial composite graft tympanoplasty in the treatment of posterior marginal and attic retraction pockets. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1069-74
  17. Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:471-4
  18. Duckert LG, Müller J, Makielski KH, Helms J. Composite autograft "sh