Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

National and International Publication Differences ofOtolaryngology

Otolaringoloji Alanında Ulusal ve Uluslararası Yayın Farklılıkları

Pages
268–274
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Science requires teamwork and the resulting different ideas and different points of view increase the quality of articles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Varying criteria for associate professorship have directed researchers to write more articles and to publish in international and national journals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to compare and reveal any differences between articles written by Turkish authors in the field of otolaryngology, which have been accepted for publication in national and international journals in the last 6 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Science requires teamwork and the resulting different ideas and different points of view increase the quality of articles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Varying criteria for associate professorship have directed researchers to write more articles and to publish in international and national journals. The aim of this study was to compare and reveal any differences between articles written by Turkish authors in the field of otolaryngology, which have been accepted for publication in national and international journals in the last 6 years. Material and Methods: In the study, 16 journals in the 2018 Science Citation Index and 6 national journals in the field of otolaryngology were examined. A record was made of which journal the article was published in, the date, the number of authors, where the authors worked, the subject of the article, and whether or not it was an animal study. Results: A total of 398 original research articles were published in the 16 SCI journals and 675 in the 6 national journals in the field of otolaryngology between 1 January 2014, and 1 September 2019. When the articles were classified according to subject, the most articles were seen to be on the subject of pediatric otolaryngology (38.69%) in international journals and otology (29.03%) in national journals. From 2014 to date, compared to national journals, there can be seen to be a higher number of authors in articles accepted by international journals, independently of the change in associate professorship criteria. Conclusion: The change in associate professorship criteria caused a decrease in the number of authors of articles in both national and international journals. Science requires teamwork and the resulting different ideas and different points of view increase the quality of articles.

Özet

Amaç: Doçentlik kriterlerinin değişimi araştırmacıları daha çokmakale yazmaya ve ulusal-uluslararası dergilerde yayınlatmaya itmek tedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk yazarlar tarafından yazılan ve son 6yılda otolaringoloji alanında ulusal ve uluslararası dergilerde kabul edi len makaleleri karşılaştırmak ve farklılıkları saptamaktır. Gereç veYöntemler: Çalışmada, otolaringoloji alanında 2018 yılında ScienceCitation Index’te taranan 16 dergi ile 6 Türk otolaringoloji dergisi de ğerlendirilmiştir. Makalenin hangi dergide yayımlandığı, tarihi, yazarsayısı, yazarın çalıştığı kurum, makalenin konu başlığı ve hayvan ça lışması olup olmadığı kayıt altına alınmıştır. Bulgular: 1 Ocak 2014-1Eylül 2019 tarihleri arasında 16 Science Citation Index dergisinde ya yımlanan 398 ve 6 Türk otolaringoloji dergisinde yayımlanan 675 ori jinal araştırma makalesi değerlendirildi. Makaleler konusuna göregruplandırıldığında, uluslararası dergilerde pediatrik otolaringoloji ala nında (%38,69), ulusal dergilerde ise otoloji alanında (%29,03) yayın ların olduğu görüldü. 2014 yılından bugüne, ulusal dergilere görekarşılaştırıldığında, doçentlik kriter değişiminden bağımsız olarak yazarsayısının uluslararası dergilerde kabul edilen makalelerde daha fazlaolduğu görüldü. Sonuç: Doçentlik kriterlerinin değişimi hem Türk hemde uluslararası dergilerde yazar sayısında azalmaya sebep olmaktadır.Bilim, ekip çalışması gerektirir ve değişik bakış açıları ile oluşan farklı fikirler makalelerin kalitesini artıracaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞLI, H., KARAKOÇ, Ö., GÖKGÖZ, M. C. (2022). National and International Publication Differences ofOtolaryngology. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 268–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/653048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kohlert S, Zuccaro L, McLean L, Macdonald K. Does medical school research productivity predict a resident's research productivity during residency? J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017
  2. 46(1):34.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 2. Frank E. Authors' criteria for selecting journals. JAMA. 1994
  3. 272(2):163-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] 3. Gökgöz MC, Taşlı H, Karakoç Ö. A 6-year analysis of publications from Turkey in the field of otolaryngology in Science Citation Index Journals: before and after the change in criteria for associate professorship. KBB ve BBC Dergisi. 2020
  4. 28(1):9-15.[Crossref] 4. Erdağ TK, Kurtoğlu G. The 100 most cited Turkish papers in the Otorhinolaryngology Journals of Web of Science. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015
  5. 53(3):112-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 5. Yıldırım N, Topuz MF, Zorlu A, Erdoğan O, Aksoy S. An analysis of otology-neurotology Articles from Turkey Published in Science Citation Indexed Otolaryngology Journals from 2012 through 2016. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019
  6. 57(3):127-32.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 6. Saunders TFC, Rymer BC, McNamara KJ. A global bibliometric analysis of otolaryngology: head and neck surgery literature. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017
  7. 42(6):1338-42.[Crossref] [PubMed] 7. Cimmino MA, Maio T, Ugolini D, Borasi F, Mela GS. Trends in otolaryngology research during the period 1995-2000: a bibliometric approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005
  8. 132(2):295-302.[Crossref] [PubMed] 8. Boerner R, Hatch JL, Harruff E, Nguyen SA, Rizk HG, Meyer TA, et al. Publishing trends in otology and neurotology. Otol Neurotol. 2018
  9. 39(1):127-32. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 9. Aodeng S, Gao Z. Otorhinolaryngology publication from Chinese authors: a 11-year survey of the literature. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018
  10. 138(1):90-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] 10. Cass ND, Okland TS, Rodriguez K, Mann SE. Otolaryngology education: recent trends in publication. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017
  11. 156(6):1124-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] 11. Coelho DH, Edelmayer LW, Fenton JE. Citation analysis of otorhinolaryngology journals: follow-up study. J Laryngol Otol. 2015
  12. 129(5): 489-93.[Crossref] [PubMed] 12. Celho DH, Edelmayer LW, Fenton JE. A century of citation classics in otolaryngologyhead and neck surgery journals revisited. Laryngoscope. 2014
  13. 124(6):1358-62.[Crossref] [PubMed] 13. Subbarayan RS, Koester L, Villwock MR, Villwock J. Proliferation and contributions of national database studies in Otolaryngology Literature Published in the United States: 2005-2016. Ann Otol Rhino