Journals / Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

ADAPTATION OF THE FOOD NEOPHOBIA SCALE INTO TURKISH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

BESİN NEOFOBİSİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
157–161
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the demographical characteristics of the patients were questioned in the first stage,the 10-item FNS form having been translated into Turkish was used.Results: In the study, the existence of sufficient correlation among the items in the scale and the adequacy of sample size was examined; it wasdetermined that the sample size was sufficient (KMO=0.78) and there was a sufficient relationship between the items for factor analyzes(χ2=142.502; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was conducted so at to verify the validity and reliability of “Food Neophobia Scale (FNS)” scale in Turkish.Methods: The study was conducted on a total of 195 individuals (46.2% is male, 53.8% is female) aged between 19 and 64 (38.6±13.51) whoaccepted to voluntarily participate in the study in Ankara.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: This study was conducted so at to verify the validity and reliability of “Food Neophobia Scale (FNS)” scale in Turkish.Methods: The study was conducted on a total of 195 individuals (46.2% is male, 53.8% is female) aged between 19 and 64 (38.6±13.51) whoaccepted to voluntarily participate in the study in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the demographical characteristics of the patients were questioned in the first stage,the 10-item FNS form having been translated into Turkish was used.Results: In the study, the existence of sufficient correlation among the items in the scale and the adequacy of sample size was examined; it wasdetermined that the sample size was sufficient (KMO=0.78) and there was a sufficient relationship between the items for factor analyzes(χ2=142.502; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted so at to verify the validity and reliability of “Food Neophobia Scale (FNS)” scale in Turkish.Methods: The study was conducted on a total of 195 individuals (46.2% is male, 53.8% is female) aged between 19 and 64 (38.6±13.51) whoaccepted to voluntarily participate in the study in Ankara. While the demographical characteristics of the patients were questioned in the first stage,the 10-item FNS form having been translated into Turkish was used.Results: In the study, the existence of sufficient correlation among the items in the scale and the adequacy of sample size was examined; it wasdetermined that the sample size was sufficient (KMO=0.78) and there was a sufficient relationship between the items for factor analyzes(χ2=142.502; p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma; “Food Neophobia Scale (FNS)” ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliğini gerçekleştirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışma Ankara ilinde gönüllü olarak çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden, yaşları 19-64 (38,6±13,51) yıl arasında olan toplam 195 (%46,2 erkek, %53,8 kadın) birey üzerinde yürütülmüştür. İlk aşamada hastaların demografik özellikleri sorgulanırken; 2. aşamada 10 maddelik FNS’nin Türkçeye çevrilmiş formu kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmada ölçekteki maddeler arasında yeterli korelasyonun olup olmadığı ve örneklem büyüklüğünün yeterliliği incelenmiş; örneklem büyüklüğünün yeterli olduğu (KMO=0,78) ve maddeler arasında faktör analizi yapılabilecek yeterli düzeyde ilişkinin olduğu saptanmıştır (χ2=142,502; p

🔖

Cite This Article

Ok, M. A., Keser, A., Duman, E. (2022). ADAPTATION OF THE FOOD NEOPHOBIA SCALE INTO TURKISH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 157–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/575043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Raudenbush B, Schroth F, Reilley S, Frank RA. Food neophobia, odor evaluation and exploratory sniffing behavior. Appetite. 1998;31:171-183. doi:10.1006/appe.1998.0161
  2. Russell CG, Worsley A. A population-based study of preschoolers’ food neophobia and its associations with food preferences. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40:11-19. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2007.03.007
  3. Skinner JD, Carruth BR, Bounds W, Ziegler PJ. Children's food preferences: a longitudinal analysis. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1638-1647. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90349-4
  4. Pliner P, Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite. 1992;19:105-120. doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-W
  5. Galloway AT, Lee Y, Birch LL. Predictors and consequences of food neophobia and pickiness in young girls. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:692-698. doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50134
  6. Dovey TM, Staples PA, Gibson EL, Halford JC. Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’eating in children: a review. Appetite. 2008;50:181-193. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.009
  7. Capiola A, Raudenbush B. The effects of food neophobia and food neophilia on diet and metabolic processing. Food Nutr Sci. 2012;3:1397-1403. doi:10.4236/fns.2012.310183
  8. Koivisto UK, Sjödén PO. Food and general neophobia in Swedish families: Parent–child comparisons and relationships with serving specific foods. Appetite. 1996;26:107-118. doi:10.1006/appe.1996.0009
  9. Meiselman HL, King SC, Gillette M. The demographics of neophobia in a large commercial US sample. Food Qual Prefer. 2010;21:893-897. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05. 009
  10. Ritchey PN, Frank RA, Hursti UK, Tuorila H. Validation and cross-national comparison of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis. Appetite. 2003;40:163- 173. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(02)00134-4
  11. Roßbach S, Foterek K, Schmidt I, Hilbig A, Alexy U, Food neophobia in German adolescents: Determinants and association with dietary habits. Appetite. 2016;101:184-191. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.159
  12. Falciglia GA, Couch SC, Gribble LS, Pabst SM, Frank R. Food neophobia in childhood affects dietary variety. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1474-1481. doi:10.1016/S0002- 8223(00)004 12-0
  13. Cooke L, Carnell S, Wardle J. Food neophobia and mealtime food consumption in 4–5 year old children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:14. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-14
  14. Fernández-Ruiz V, Claret A, Chaya C. Testing a Spanishversion of the food neophobia scale. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;28:222-225