Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3

Türk çocuklarında dişhekimliği işlemlerine karşı duyulan korkunun frankl davranış derecelendirme ölçeği (fs) ve ses-göz-motor ölçeği (sem) ile değerlendirilmesi

Assessment of dental fear in turkish children with the frankl behavior rating Scale (FS) and the sound-eye-Motor (SEM) scale

Pages
272–276
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The "tell-show-do" technique is a viable alternative to pharmacological interventions with respect to reducing dental fear in Turkish children

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to compare dental fear in Turkish children to whom the "tell-show-do" technique was applied with those to whom it was not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eightyeight children (44 male, 44 female) admitted to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry were the participants in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The "tell-show-do" technique is a viable alternative to pharmacological interventions with respect to reducing dental fear in Turkish children
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare dental fear in Turkish children to whom the "tell-show-do" technique was applied with those to whom it was not. The degrees of dental fear of the children were measured by Frankl Behavior Rating (FS) and Sound-Eye-Motor (SEM) scales during their first appointment with a dentist. Eightyeight children (44 male, 44 female) admitted to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry were the participants in this study. The assessment of the behavior of each child was made using the FS and by taking physiological measures during their first appointment with a dentist. Patients' behavior during each treatment was evaluated using the SEM scale. All dental treatments and "tell-show-do" techniques were applied by the same certified examiner, with the FS and SEM scales being applied by a second, independently certified examiner. Chi-square tests were used to compare the two groups of children based on exposure to the "tell-show-do" technique. All statistical analyses and calculations were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows (SPSS, Ver. 17.0, Chicago, IL., USA). There were significant group differences in both FS and SEM scale scores (p < 0.05). The "tell-show-do" technique is a viable alternative to pharmacological interventions with respect to reducing dental fear in Turkish children

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilk kez diş hekimine gelen ve diş hekimi korkusu olan çocuklarda "anlat-göster-uygula" tekniğinin etkinliğinin, Frankl Davranış Değerlendirme Ölçeği (FS) ve Ses-Göz-Motor Ölçeği (SEM) vasıtasıyla değerlendirilmesidir. Çalışmaya Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Kliniği'ne başvuran 88 çocuk (44 erkek, 44 kız) dahil edilmiştir. İlk kez diş hekimine gelen bu çocukların davranışları FS kullanarak değerlendirilmiştir. Tedavi sırasındaki hasta davranışları ise SEM kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Tüm diş tedavileri ve "anlat-göster-uygula" tekniği aynı araştırmacı tarafından uygulanmıştır. FS ve SEM verilerinin kaydı ise bir başka kalibre araştırmacı tarafından yapılmıştır. "Anlat-göster-uygula" tekniğinin etkinliğini değerlendirmek ve iki grubu karşılaştırmak amacıyla ki-kare testinden yararlanılmıştır. Tüm istatistiksel analizler ve hesaplamalar için SPSS Windows (SPSS, Ver. 17,0, Chicago, IL., ABD) kullanılmıştır. FS ve SEM puanlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılığa rastlanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, C., AKGÜN, Ö. M., POLAT, G. G., OK, M. A., ALTUN, C., BAŞAK, F. (2016). Türk çocuklarında dişhekimliği işlemlerine karşı duyulan korkunun frankl davranış derecelendirme ölçeği (fs) ve ses-göz-motor ölçeği (sem) ile değerlendirilmesi. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3, 272–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/225264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Erten H, Akarslan ZZ, Bodrumlu E. Dental fear and anxiety levels of patients attending a dental clinic. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 304-310
  2. Watson AT, Visram A. Children's preoperative anxiety and postoperative behaviour. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 188-204
  3. Baier K, Milgrom P, Russell S, Mancl L, Yo-shida T. Children's fear and behavior in pri-vate pediatric dentistry practices. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 316-321. 4. ten Berge M, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J, Prins PJM. Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands: prevalence and normative data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30: 11-17
  4. Oba AA, Dülgergil ÇT, Sönmez IŞ. Prevalence of Dental Anxiety in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children and Its Relationship to Dental Caries. Med Princ Pract 2009; 18: 453-457
  5. Yamada MK, Tanabe Y, Sano T, Noda T. Co-operation during dental treatment: the Children's Fear Survey Schedule in Japanese children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 404-409
  6. Nakai Y, Hirakawa T, Milgrom P, et al. The Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale in Japan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33: 196-204
  7. Addelston HK. Child patient training. Fortnightly Review of the ChicagoDental Society, 1959; 38: 7-9
  8. AAPD Clinical Affairs Committee-Behavior Management SubcommitteeGuideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient. AAPD Reference Manual 2011; 34: 170-182
  9. Law CS, Blain S. Approaching the pediatric dental patient: A review of nonpharmacologic behavior management strategies. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 703-713
  10. Feigal RJ. Guiding and managing the child dental patient: A fresh look at old pedagogy. J Dent Educ 2001; 65: 1369-1377 12. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Ped Dent 1991; 13: 278-282
  11. Willershausen B, Azrak A, Wilms S. Fear of dental treatment and its possible effects on oral health. Eur J Med Res 1999; 4: 72-77
  12. Adair SM. Behavior management conference panel I report-- rational for behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 167-70
  13. Ramos MM, Carrara CF, Gomide MR. Parental acceptance of behavior management techniques for children with clefts. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005; 72: 74-77
  14. Lawrence SM, McTigue DJ, Wilson S, Odom JG, Waggoner WF, Fields HW Jr. Parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 151-155
  15. Klinberg G. Dental anxiety and