SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND SEMIAUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRONTAL AND SPHENOID SINUS AREA AND VOLUME USING OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

FRONTAL VE SFENOİD SİNUS ALAN VE HACMİNİN MANUEL VE YARI OTOMATİK SEGMENTASYON MODÜLÜ KULLANILARAK BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİDE İNCELENMESİ

Gözde SERİNDERE
Ceren Aktuna BELGİN
Pages
216–222
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant difference was found between manual mode and semi-automatic mode in volume calculation (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the manual and semi-automatic segmentation modules of the third-generation software used in computedtomography (CT) images in calculating frontal sinus (FS) and sphenoid sinus (SS) areas and volumes.Methods: CT images of 200 patients (96 female, 104 male) between the ages of 19 and 73 years (mean 37.38 ± 16.32 years) were randomly selected.Volume and area of FS and SS were segmented manually and semi-automatically using InVesalius 3.1.1 software (CTI, Campinas, São Paulo,Brazil).Results: There was a statistically significant difference was found the main SS area in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 4.80 ± 1.86 $cm^2$ and 4.84 ± 1.83 $cm^2$, respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main SS volumes were in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 8.44 ± 3.55 $cm^3$and 9.62 ± 3.21 $cm^3$, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference was found between manual mode and semi-automatic mode in volume calculation (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the manual and semi-automatic segmentation modules of the third-generation software used in computedtomography (CT) images in calculating frontal sinus (FS) and sphenoid sinus (SS) areas and volumes.Methods: CT images of 200 patients (96 female, 104 male) between the ages of 19 and 73 years (mean 37.38 ± 16.32 years) were randomly selected.Volume and area of FS and SS were segmented manually and semi-automatically using InVesalius 3.1.1 software (CTI, Campinas, São Paulo,Brazil).Results: There was a statistically significant difference was found the main SS area in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 4.80 ± 1.86 $cm^2$ and 4.84 ± 1.83 $cm^2$, respectively. The main SS volumes were in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 8.44 ± 3.55 $cm^3$and 9.62 ± 3.21 $cm^3$, respectively. The main FS volumes were in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 5.32 ± 2.04 $cm^3$ and 6.65 ± 2.70 $cm^3$, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference was found between manual mode and semi-automatic mode in volume calculation (p

Özet

Amaç: Frontal sinus (FS) ve sfenoid sinus (SS) alan ve hacimlerinin ölçümlerinde üçüncü jenerasyon yazılımların manuel ve yarı otomatik segmantesyon modüllerinin etkinliğinin bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) görüntüleri kullanılarak karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Yaşları 19-73 arasında değişen (ortalama 37,38 ± 16,32 yıl) 200 hastaya (96 kadın, 104 erkek) ait BT görüntüleri rastgele seçilmiştir. FS ve SS alan ve hacimleri InVesalius 3.1.1 (CTI, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil) yazılımın manuel ve yarı otomatik segmentasyon modülleri kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Bulgular Manuel (4,80 ± 1,86 $cm^2$) ve yarı otomatik (4,84 ± 1,83 $cm^2$) segmentasyon modlarındaki SS alan ölçümleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİNDERE, G., BELGİN, C. A. (2022). COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND SEMIAUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRONTAL AND SPHENOID SINUS AREA AND VOLUME USING OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 216–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/574978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Besana JL, Rogers TL. Personal identification using the frontal sinus. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 55(3):584–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01281.x
  2. Akhlaghi M, Bakhtavar K, Moarefdoost J, Kamali A, Rafeifar S. Frontal sinus parameters in computed tomography and sex determination. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016; 19:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.01.008 3. Belaldavar C, Kotrashetti VS, Hallikerimath SR, Kale AD. Assessment of frontal sinus dimensions to determine sexual dimorphism among Indian adults. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014; 6(1):25–30. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.127766
  3. Christensen AM. Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;127(3):291-295. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20116
  4. Quatrehomme G, Fronty P, Sapanet M, Grevin G, Bailet P, Ollier A. Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;83(2):147-153. doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(96)02033-6
  5. Rahmati A, Ghafari R, AnjomShoa M. Normal variations of sphenoid sinus and the adjacent structures detected in cone beam computed tomography. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17(1):32– 37. PMCID: PMC4771050 7. Bademci G, Ünal B. Surgical importance of neurovascular relationships of paranasal sinus region. Turk Neurosurg. 2005;15:93-96
  6. Mamatha H, Saraswathi G, Prasanna LC. Variations of sphenoid sinus and their impact on related neurovascular structures. Curr Neurobiol. 2010;1(2):121-124
  7. Eggesbo HB. Radiological imaging of inflammatory lesions in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(4):872-888. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-0068-2 10. Kazmi KS, Shames JP. Imaging of the paranasal sinuses. J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol. 2015;20(7):27
  8. Tatlisumak E, Ovali GY, Asirdizer M, et al. CT study on morphometry of frontal sinus. Clin Anat. 2008; 21(4):287-293. doi: 10.1002/ca.20617
  9. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A. Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007;34(2):191-195. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2006.09.003
  10. Pirner S, Tingelhoff K, Wagner I, et al. CT-based manual segmentation and evaluation of paranasal sinuses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(4):507–518. doi: 10.1007/ s00405-008-0777-7. 14. de Water VR, Saridin JK, Bouw F, Murawska MM, Koudstaal MJ. Measuring upper airway volume: accuracy and reliability of Dolphin 3D software compared to manual segmentation in craniosynostosis patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg