Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Problem Behaviours Exhibited By Special Needs Students in General Education Classrooms and Teacher Reactions

Genel Eğitim Sınıflarındaki Özel Gereksinimli Öğrencilerin Sergilediği Problem Davranışlar İle Davranış Sonrası Öğretmen Tepkilerinin İncelenmesi

Pages
551–566
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that teachers commonly responded to problem behaviors in 11th -20th minutes of the class; that problem behaviors such as moving from their seats without permission and talking during class generated the most frequent responses from teachers and that teachers mostly used verbal warnings (such as "be quiet, listen to the lesson, sit in your seat, don't talk, hold up your finger".) in response to problem behaviors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate problem behaviors exhibited by special needs students in general education classrooms and teacher reactions to those problem behaviors. 72 classroom teachers employed in primary schools in Bolu who allowed observations in their classrooms with special needs students and the special needs students in those classrooms participated in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Anecdotal record technique was used to record student behaviors and teacher responses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that teachers commonly responded to problem behaviors in 11th -20th minutes of the class; that problem behaviors such as moving from their seats without permission and talking during class generated the most frequent responses from teachers and that teachers mostly used verbal warnings (such as "be quiet, listen to the lesson, sit in your seat, don't talk, hold up your finger".) in response to problem behaviors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate problem behaviors exhibited by special needs students in general education classrooms and teacher reactions to those problem behaviors. 72 classroom teachers employed in primary schools in Bolu who allowed observations in their classrooms with special needs students and the special needs students in those classrooms participated in the study. Anecdotal record technique was used to record student behaviors and teacher responses. Data were collected by three independent observers and descriptive analysis was used in data analysis. Results showed that teachers commonly responded to problem behaviors in 11th -20th minutes of the class; that problem behaviors such as moving from their seats without permission and talking during class generated the most frequent responses from teachers and that teachers mostly used verbal warnings (such as "be quiet, listen to the lesson, sit in your seat, don't talk, hold up your finger".) in response to problem behaviors.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, genel eğitim sınıflarındaki özel gereksinimli öğrencilerin sergilediği problem davranışlar ile davranış sonrası öğretmen tepkilerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya Bolu İli'ndeki ilkokullarda görev yapan, sınıfında kaynaştırma öğrencisi olan ve sınıfında gözlem yapılmasına izin veren 72 sınıf öğretmeni ile bu sınıflardaki özel gereksinimli öğrenciler katılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin toplanmasında anekdot kaydı tekniği kullanılmıştır. Veriler üç bağımsız gözlemci tarafından toplanmış; verilerin çözümlenmesinde betimsel analizden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin problem davranışlarına en sık dersin 11. dakikası ile 20. dakikası arasında tepki gösterdikleri; en sık öğrencilerin izinsiz sınıfta gezinme ve arkadaşı ile konuşma davranışlarına tepkide bulundukları ve en çok sözel uyarma (sessiz ol, dersi dinle, yerinde otur, konuşma, parmak kaldır vb.) tepkilerini verdikleri belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PINAR, E. S., YILDIZ, N. G. (2022). Investigation of Problem Behaviours Exhibited By Special Needs Students in General Education Classrooms and Teacher Reactions. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 551–566. https://ajindex.com/articles/571873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Akalın, S. (2007). İlköğretim birinci kademedeki sınıf öğretmenleri ile kaynaştırma öğrencisi olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin sınıf içi davranışlarının incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  2. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  3. Baker, J. A., Clark, T. P., Maier, K. S., & Viger, S. (2008). The differential influence of instructional context on the academic engagement of students with behavior problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1876-1883.
  4. Brown, W. H., Odom, S. L., Li, S., & Zercher, C. (1999). Ecobehavioral assessment in early childhood programs: A portrait of preschhool ınclusion. The Journal of Special Education, 33 (3), 138-153.
  5. Carr, E. G, Taylor, J. C., & Robinson, S. (1991). The effects of severe behavior problems in children on the teaching behavior of adults. The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24 (3): 523-535. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-523.
  6. Cook, B. G., Cameron, D. L., & Tankersley, M. (2007). Inclusive teachers' attitudinal ratingsmof their students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 230-239.
  7. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113-143.
  8. Cullen, J. P., Gregory, J. L. & Noto, L. A. (2010). The teacher attitudes toward inclusion scale (TATIS) technical report. ED 509930. Greenwood, C. R., (1996). Research on the practices and behavior of effective teachers at Juniper Gardens Children's Project: Implications for the education of diverse learners. In D. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 39-67).
  9. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Gunter, P. L., & Coutinho, M. J. (1997). Negative reinforcement in classrooms: What we're beginning to learn. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 249-264.
  10. Güleç-Aslan, Y. (2013). A training programme for a teacher working with a student with ASD: An action research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13 (4), 2229-2246.
  11. Güner-Yıldız, N. (2015). Teacher and student behaviors in insive classrooms. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15 (1), 177-184.
  12. Güner-Yıldız, N. & Melekoğlu, M. (2012a). Kaynaştırma sınıflarında öğretmen ve öğrenci davranışları arasındaki ilişki. 11-12 Ekim 2012'de 22. Özel Eğitim Kongresi'nde sunulan sö