Journals / Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Four rectorectal tumor cases operated via posterior approach

Posterior yaklaşım ile opere edilen dört retrorektal tümör vakası içeren olgu serisi

Pages
28–30
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To analyze the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal tumors, with our experience of 4 patients operated in our department, was aimed in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Retrorectal tumors are rarely seen, can be diagnosed with various techniques and often the treatment is troublesome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All cancer patients, were treated between January 1992-January 2002 in our department, were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To analyze the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal tumors, with our experience of 4 patients operated in our department, was aimed in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Retrorectal tumors are rarely seen, can be diagnosed with various techniques and often the treatment is troublesome. The diagnosis can be delayed when these tumors behave as perianal sinuses. All cancer patients, were treated between January 1992-January 2002 in our department, were retrospectively evaluated. The diagnostic tools, operations and pathological results were assessed in patients with retrorectal tumors. There were 4 patients (3 female) with a mean age of 28 (24-32) in our study. Pain was the most common compliant. One patient was misdiagnosed and mistreated in another institution. The excisions of the tumors were performed with coccyxectomy via a posterior approach in all cases. The pathological results were neurogenic tumor (n=2), congenital tumor (n=l) and inflammatory tumor (n=l). Retrorectal tumors should be kept in mind as a diagnosis for the recurrent perianal sinuses. The local excision of the tumor with coccyxectomy may be an appropriate surgical technique for the treatment of these tumors. To analyze the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal tumors, with our experience of 4 patients operated in our department, was aimed in this study.

Özet

Retrorektal tümörler çeşitli tanı araçlarıyla teşhis edilen ancak tedavisi genellikle güç, ender görülen malignitelerdir. Kendilerini perianal sinüs olarak da ortaya koyan bu tümörler tamda gecikmelere neden olmaktadır. Kliniğimizde Ocak 1992-Ocak 2002 tarihleri arasında öpere edilen tüm kanserli hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Tarama sonuçlarında ortaya konulan retrorektal tümörlü hastalarda kullanılan tanı araçları, semptomatoloji, yapılan operasyonlar ve patolojik tanılar irdelendi. Çalışmamızdaki 4 olguda (üçü kadın) ortanca yaş 28'di (24-32). Ağrı en sık semptomdu. Bir hasta pilonidal sinüs tanısı ile başka bir hastanede opere edilmişti. Hastaların hepsinde posterior yaklaşımla kitle eksizyonu ve koksiksektomi uygulandı. Patolojik tanıları nörojenik tümör (n=2), konjenital tümör (n=1), enflamatuar tümör (n=1) olarak tespit edildi. Perianal sinüs olarak da klinik bulgu verebilen bu tümörler daima akılda bulundurulmalı, şüpheli olgularda ayırıcı tam için diğer tanısal yöntemlerden faydalanılmalıdır. Koksiksin çıkarılması ile beraber yapılacak olan posterior yaklaşımla kitle eksizyonu bu tümörlerde yeterli ve güvenli bir tedavi yöntemidir. Bu çalışmada, kliniğimizde öpere edilmiş olan bu 4 olgu eşliğinde, seyrek görülen retrorektal tümörlerin tanısı ve tedavisini tartışmak amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

VURAL, S., ERDEMİR, A., ONURAY, F., MENTEŞ, C., GEZEN, C., ÖNCEL, M. (2022). Four rectorectal tumor cases operated via posterior approach. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 28–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/571505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. İnceoğlu R, Dağlı T, Karadeniz AN. Anus-Rektum Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi. 1991; 1: 1-3
  2. Jao SW, Beart RW, Spencer RJ, et al. Retrorectal tumors. Mayo Clinic experience, 1960-1979. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 644-52
  3. Stewart RJ, Humphrey WG, Parks TG. The presentation and management of presacral tumors. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 153-5
  4. Haribhakti SP, Choudhary CG, Sikora SS. Malignant retrorectal teratoma presenting as an infected perianal sinus. Trop Gastroenterol 1995; 16: 117-8
  5. Hutton KA, Benson EA. Case report: Tail gut cyst-assessment with transrectal ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1992; 45: 288-9
  6. Dahan H, Arrive L, Wendu D, et al. Retrorectal developmental cysts in adults: Clinical and radiologic-histopathologic review, differential diagnosis and treatment. Radiographic 2001; 21: 575-84
  7. Localio SA, Eng K, Ranson JHC. Abdominosacral apporoach for retrorectal tumors. Ann Surg 1980; 191: 555-60
  8. Canopreso PR, Wengert PA Jr, Milford HE. Tail gut cyst- a rare retrorectal tumor: Report of a case and review. Dis Colon Rectum 1975; 18: 597-600
  9. Amendola BE, Amendola MA, Oliver E, et al. Chordoma: Role of radiation therapy. Radiology 1986; 158: 839-43
  10. Timmerman W, Bubrick MP. Presacral and postsacral extraspinal ependymoma: Report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 114-9
  11. Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Retrorectal Tumors. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S (eds). Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum and Anus. 2nd ed, 444 Quality Medical Publishing Inc, St Louis, Missouri, 1999: 545-52.