SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the Relationship between Prospective Teachers’ Participative Assessment Beliefs and Individual Innovativeness State

Öğretmen Adaylarının Katılımcı Değerlendirmeye Yönelik İnançları ile Bireysel Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

İsmail KİNAY
Sedef SÜER
Pages
185–202
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, prospective teachers’ participative assessment beliefs were found to be a significant predictor of their individual innovativeness state.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to examine the relationship between prospective teachers’ participative assessment beliefs and individual innovativeness state.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The correlational survey method was used in this study and the study group was comprised of 313 senior students studying in faculty of education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, prospective teachers’ participative assessment beliefs were found to be a significant predictor of their individual innovativeness state.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between prospective teachers’ participative assessment beliefs and individual innovativeness state. The correlational survey method was used in this study and the study group was comprised of 313 senior students studying in faculty of education. The data of the study were collected via “Beliefs About Participative Assessment Instrument” and “Individual Innovativeness Scale”. The data obtained were analyzed through Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The results of the analysis showed that prospective teachers have a high level of participative assessment beliefs while their individual innovativeness state was determined to be in the category of interrogators. In addition, a positive relationship was found between prospective teachers’ participative assessment beliefs and their individual innovativeness state. Finally, prospective teachers’ participative assessment beliefs were found to be a significant predictor of their individual innovativeness state.

Özet

Bu çalışmada öğretmen adaylarının katılımcı değerlendirmeye yönelik inançları ile bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmış olup çalışma grubunu 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim yılında bir devlet üniversitesinin eğitim fakültesine kayıtlı 313 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma verileri “Katılımcı Değerlendirmeye Yönelik İnanç Ölçeği” ve “Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği” ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen veriler SPSS paket programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve verilerin analizinde yüzde, frekans, korelasyon ve basit regresyon analiz yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler neticesinde öğretmen adaylarının katılımcı değerlendirmeye yönelik inançlarının yüksek düzeyde, yenilikçilik düzeylerinin ise sorgulayıcı kategorisinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının katılımcı değerlendirmeye yönelik inançları ile yenilikçilik düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönlü orta düzeyde ilişki olduğu, öğretmen adaylarının katılımcı değerlendirmeye yönelik inançlarının yenilikçilik düzeylerinin anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KİNAY, İ., SÜER, S. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship between Prospective Teachers’ Participative Assessment Beliefs and Individual Innovativeness State. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 185–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/570213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akdeniz, A. and Kadı, A. (2016, December). Investigating individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies of students in TMSC. Paper presented at the meeting of ICLEL Conferences Sakarya University Faculty of Education, Sakarya. Alismail, H. A. and McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150-154.
  2. Amar, S. and David, N. B. (2016). Realistic intelligence and 21st century skills in adapted learning environment. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 588-596.
  3. Andresen, L., Jackson, M. and Kirby, E. (1994). Learning by doing. Higher Education Research and Development, 13(2), 111-120.
  4. Baxter-Magolda, M. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender–related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bloxham, S. and West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conception of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 721-733.
  5. Bommer, M. and Jalajas, D. (2002). The innovation work environment of high–tech SMEs in the USA and Canada. R&D Management, 32(5), 379-386.
  6. Brew, C. and Riley, P. (2011). Measuring student support for participative assessment and related strategies: Development and testing of the beliefs about participative assessment instruments (BAPAI). Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 32-52.
  7. Brew, C., Riley, P. and Walta, C. (2009). Education students and their teachers: comparing views on participative assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6), 641-657.
  8. Brindley, C. and Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programs. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-89.
  9. Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge. Brown, G. T. L. and Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3-17.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (15. baskı). Ankara:
  11. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz Ş. and Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  12. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  13. Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara:
  14. Pegem Akademi. Collins, A. (1990). The role of computer technology in restructur