SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

RECIPROC VERSUS WISTED FILE FOR ROOT CANAL FILLING REMOVAL: ASSESSMENT OFAPICALLYEX UDED DEBRIS

Kök Kanal Dolgusunun Uzaklaştırılmasında Reciproc ile Twisted File ’ın Karşılaştırılması: Apikalden Taşan Debrisin Değerlendirilmesi

Demet ALTUNBAŞ
Kürşat ER
Gizem KUTLU
Betül KÜTÜK
Mustafa TOYOĞLU
Alper I KUŞTARCI
Pages
36–42
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (n

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this stuay was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with difi‘erent file systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this stuay Root canals ofthe teeth were instrumented andfilled before being randomly assigned to three groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (n
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this stuay was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with difi‘erent file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this stuay Root canals ofthe teeth were instrumented andfilled before being randomly assigned to three groups. Guttapercha was removed using the Reciproc system, the Twisted File system (TF), andHedström—files (H-file). Apically extruded debris was collected and dried in pre-weighedEppendorftubes. The amount ofextruded debris was assessed with an electronic balance. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal- Wallis, and Mann- Whitney tests. Results: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (n

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı eğe sistemleriyle tekrarlayan endodontik tedaviler sırasında apikalden taşan debris miktarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, altmış adet çekilmiş mandibular premolar insan dişi kullanıldı. Dişlerin kök kanalları rastgele üç gruba ayrılmadan önce şekillendirildi ve dolduruldu. Guta-perka Reciproc sistem, Twisted ile sistem (TF) ve Hedstro'm eğelerle (H-tı'pi) uzaklaştırıldı. Apikalden taşan debris önceden tartılmış Eppendoıftüplerinde toplandı ve kurutuldu. Taşan debris miktarı elektronik tartı ile belirlendi. Veriler one-way ANOVA, Kruskal- Wallis ve MannWhitney testleri kullanzlarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Reciproc ve TFsistemleri H-tipi eğelerden anlamlı derecede az debris taşırdı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNBAŞ, D., ER, K., KUTLU, G., KÜTÜK, B., TOYOĞLU, M., KUŞTARCI, A. I. (2022). RECIPROC VERSUS WISTED FILE FOR ROOT CANAL FILLING REMOVAL: ASSESSMENT OFAPICALLYEX UDED DEBRIS. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 36–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/563801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. l. Siqueira JF, Jr. Aetiology ofroot canal treatment failure: Why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod 2001;34(1):1-10.
  2. Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A. Endodontic retreatment--case selection and technique. 3. Retreatment techniques. Endod 1990;16(11):543-549.
  3. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. Endod 1985;11(11):472- 478. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rocas IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira C, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. Endod 2002;28(6):457-460.
  4. Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. Endod 2012;38(6):850-852.
  5. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. Endod 2014;40(10):1638-1641.
  6. Er K, Sumer Z, Akpinar KE. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use oftwo enginedriven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod 2005;38(12):871-876.
  7. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Er K. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(2):257-262.
  8. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Sumer Z, Er K, Bek B. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques. Int Endod 2008;41(12):1066-1071.
  9. Kustarci A, Altunbas D, Akpınar KE. Comparative study of apically extruded debris using one manual and two rotary instrumentation techniques for endodontic retreatrnent. Dent Sci 2012;7(2):1-6.
  10. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Threedimensional evaluation of effectiveness ofhand and rotary instrumentation for retreatrnent of canals filled with different materials. Endod 2008;34(11):1370-1373.
  11. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta—percha removal in root canal retreatrnent. Endod 2006;32(5):469- 472. Sirnsek N, Ahmetoglu F, Keles A, Bulut ET, Er K. 3d analysis of d—race and self-adjusting file in removing filling materials from curved root canals instrumented and filled with different techniques. Scientific World Journal 2014;836513. Tasdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Celik D. Efficacy of three rotary niti instruments in removing gutta—percha from root canals. Int Endod 2008;41(3):191-196.
  12. Akpinar KE, Altunbas D, Kustarci A.