SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

İşletmelerde Tepe Yönetime Yapılan Ödemelerle İlgili Ücret Stratejileri ve İşletme Performansı Arasındaki İlişki

V. Lale TÜZÜNER
Pages
25–44
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another focus of this study is to determine the link between executive com-pensation system, organization str&fggy and firm performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Executive compensation program design is a significant function of human resource management because of its direct influence on organizational strategy, employee behaviors and firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The determinants and the organizational consequences of alternative executive compensation program philosophies and approaches have been the subject of much conceptual and empirical work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another focus of this study is to determine the link between executive com-pensation system, organization str&fggy and firm performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Executive compensation program design is a significant function of human resource management because of its direct influence on organizational strategy, employee behaviors and firm performance. The determinants and the organizational consequences of alternative executive compensation program philosophies and approaches have been the subject of much conceptual and empirical work. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of executive compensation theories and to introduce the practical implications of these theo-ries. Another focus of this study is to determine the link between executive com-pensation system, organization str&fggy and firm performance.

Özet

Ücret yönetimi ve buna bağlı olarak şekillenen tepe yönetim ödül paketi, işletme stratejisine, çalışanların davranışlarına ve dolayısıyla işletme performansına olan direkt etkisinden dolayı insan kaynakları yönetiminin önemli bir işlevi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Tepe yönetim ödül paketini oluşturan temel öğeler ve organizasyonel çıktılar ile ilgili yaklaşımlar birçok kavramsal ve ampirik çalışmaya konu olmuştur. Bu çalışmada temel amaç tepe yönetim ödüllerine ilişkin çeşitli teoriler hakkında genel bilgi vermek ve ayrıca bu teorilerin uygulamadaki sonuçlarına değinmektir. Diğer bir amaç da, tepe yönetim ücret sisjemi, işletme stratejisi ve işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜZÜNER, V. L. (2022). İşletmelerde Tepe Yönetime Yapılan Ödemelerle İlgili Ücret Stratejileri ve İşletme Performansı Arasındaki İlişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 25–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/554073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Amit, R. ve Shoemaker, P.J.H. (1993), "Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent", Strategic Management Journal, Cilt.14, Sayi.10, s.33-46.
  2. Andrews, K. R., (1998), "The Concept of Corporate Strategy", Ed.: H. Mintzberg, J. B. Quinn, ve S. Ghoshal, The Strategy Process, Prentice Hall, Gözden Geçirilmiş Avrupa Baskısı, Londra. Baden-Fuller, C. ve Stopford, J. M. (1999), Rejuvenating the Mature Business, 2. Baskı,
  3. International Thomson Business Press,
  4. Londra. Baden-Fuller, C. (1995), "Strategic Innovation, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Matching Oütside-in to Inside-out Approaches to Strategy Research", British Journal of Management, Cilt.6, Özel Sayı, Kasım, s. S3-S16. Bakoğlu, R. (2000), "The Road, the Roadblocks and Diversions on the Way to Today's Strategy Concept", Öneri, Sayı. 14, Cilt. 3, Haziran, s. 101-107.
  5. Barney, J. (2001), "Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten Year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View," Journal of Management, Cilt.27, s.643-650.
  6. Barney, J. (1991), "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management, Mart, Cilt. 17, Sayı.l, s.99-120.
  7. Barney, J. (1986), "Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework," Academy of Management Review, Cilt. 11, Sayı.4, s.791-800.
  8. Barney, J. (1986b), "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy," Management Science, Cilt.32, s.1231-1241.
  9. Coates, T.T. ve McDermott, C.M. (2002), "An Exploratory Analysis of New Competencies: A Resource Based View Perspective," Journal of Operations Management, Sayi.303, s.1-17.
  10. Collis, D. ve Montgomery, C.A. (1995), "Competing On Resources: Strategy In The 1990s,"
  11. Harvard Business Review, Temmuz-Ağustos, s.118-28.
  12. Conner, K. R. (1991), "A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm," Journal of Management, Cilt. 17, Sayı.l, s.121-154.
  13. Dierickx, I. ve Cool, K. (1989), "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability or Competitive Advantage," Management Science, Cilt.32, Sayı.12, s.1504-1511.
  14. Doğan, B. (1999), "Hiperrekabetçi Sektörler ve İşletme Stratejileri," Öneri, Cilt.2, Sayı.12, s.91-95.
  15. Fiol, C.M. (2001), "Revisiting an Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management, Cilt.27, s.691-699.
  16. Ghemawat, P. (1986), "Sustainable Advantage," Harvard Business Review, Eylül-Ekim, s.53-58.
  17. Grant, R. B. (1991), "A Resource Based Theory of Comp