Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Management of violence in psychiatry clinics

Psikiyatri kliniklerinde şiddet yönetimi

Pages
116–121
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We found that forcible and suppressive methods were mostly preferred for the management of violence and suggest the preparation of legal regulations regarding the use of these methods and new studies on alternative approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Methods such as seclusion, restraint and medication used for the management of violence in psychiatry clinics can harm the patient both physically and mentally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the healthcare worker may regard the use of these forcible and suppressive methods as routine and acceptable to ensure safety.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We found that forcible and suppressive methods were mostly preferred for the management of violence and suggest the preparation of legal regulations regarding the use of these methods and new studies on alternative approaches.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Methods such as seclusion, restraint and medication used for the management of violence in psychiatry clinics can harm the patient both physically and mentally. However, the healthcare worker may regard the use of these forcible and suppressive methods as routine and acceptable to ensure safety. The forcible and suppressive methods used in the management of violence in psychiatry clinics and alternative approaches that support the patient were reviewed in this article. We found that forcible and suppressive methods were mostly preferred for the management of violence and suggest the preparation of legal regulations regarding the use of these methods and new studies on alternative approaches.

Özet

Psikiyatri kliniklerinde şiddet yönetiminde kullanılan tecrit, tespit ve ilaçlar hastaya fiziksel ve duygusal yönden zarar verebilmektedir. Bununla birlikte sağlık çalışanı hastayı zorlayıcı ve baskıcı olan bu yöntemlerin kullanımını güvenliği sağlamak için rutin ve kabul edilebilir olarak görebilmektedir. Bu makalede psikiyatri kliniklerinde şiddet yönetiminde kullanılan baskıcı/zorlayıcı yöntemlerin ve bu yöntemlere alternatif olabilecek hastayı destekleyici yaklaşımların gözden geçirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Şiddet yönetiminde öncelikle baskıcı ve zorlayıcı yöntemlere başvurulduğu görülmüş, bu yöntemlerin uygulanmasına yönelik yasal düzenlemelerin geliştirilmesi ve alternatif yaklaşımlarla ilgili çalışmalar yapılması önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, S. (2022). Management of violence in psychiatry clinics. İstanbul Üniversitesi Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 116–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/553153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Beer, D., Pereira, S., Paton, C. (2001). Psychiatric Intensive Care. London: Greenwich Medical Media. Bowers, L., Brennan, G., Flood, C., Lipang M., Oladapo, P. (2006). Preliminary outcomes of a trial to reduce conflict and containment on acute psychiatric wards: city nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13: 165-172.
  2. Craig, T. J., Bracken, J. (1995). An epidemiologic study of prn/stat medication use in a state psychiatric hospital. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 7(2): 57-64.
  3. Daffern, M., Howells, K. (2002). Psychiatric inpatient aggression. a review of structural and functional assessment approaches. Aggression Violent Behavior, 7: 477-497.
  4. Davison, S. E. The Management Of Violence İn General Psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2005;11:362-370.
  5. Dilbaz, N. Şiddet Riskinin Değerlendirilmesi ve Saldırgan Hastaya Yaklaşım. Klinik Psikiyatri 1999;2:179-188.
  6. Donat, D. C. (2005). Encouraging alternatives to seclusion, restraint, and reliance on prn drugs in a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services, 56(9): 1105-1108.
  7. Duxbury, J.A. (2002). An evaluation of staff and patients’ views of and strategies employed to manage patient aggression and violence on one mental health unit. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9: 325-337.
  8. Haris, D., Morrison, E.F. (1995). Managing violence without coercion. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 4: 203-210.
  9. Heilburn, K., Golloway, G. G., Shoukry, V. E., Gustafson, D. (1995). Physical control of patients on an inpatient setting: forensic vs civil populations. Psychiatric Quarterly, 66(2): 133-145.
  10. Fisher, W. A. (1994). Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 151: 1584-1591.
  11. Fisher, J. A. (2003). Curtailing The use of restraint in psychiatric settings. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(2): 69-95.
  12. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Tuohimaki, C., Korkeila, J., Lehtinen, V. (2003). Reasons for using seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient care. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26(2): 139-149.
  13. Kaplan, H.I., Sadock, B.J. (Eds.) (1995). Violence in the community. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1628-1635.
  14. Kingdon, D., Jones, R., Lönnqvist, J. (2004). Protecting the human rights of people with mental disorder: new recommendations emerging from the council of europe. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185: 277-279.
  15. Langenbach ve ark. (1999). Observation levels in acute psychiatric admissions. European