SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

The comparative study of conventional and ultra-high frequency induction sintering behavior of pure aluminum

Uğur ÇAVDAR
Burak GÜL
Levent Ulvi GEZİCİ
Mehmet AYVAZ
Pages
173–179
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the tests carried out in this study, it was determined that pure aluminum samples were successfully sintered with a high frequency induction system in a shorter time than traditional sintering method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, compressibility, and conventional and ultra-high frequency induction sintering behaviors of 99.8% purity and 50-70 µm size range aluminum powders were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Green samples were produced in the range of 50-275 MPa using different pressures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the tests carried out in this study, it was determined that pure aluminum samples were successfully sintered with a high frequency induction system in a shorter time than traditional sintering method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aluminium · Induction sintering · Powder metallurgy

Abstract

In this study, compressibility, and conventional and ultra-high frequency induction sintering behaviors of 99.8% purity and 50-70 µm size range aluminum powders were investigated. In the compressibility studies, uniaxial-cold pressing method was used. Green samples were produced in the range of 50-275 MPa using different pressures. By measuring the apparent densities of the produced samples, the optimum compressibility pressure was determined as 200 MPa. Pure aluminum powder metal samples produced with this ideal pressing pressure were sintered in both classical and ultra-high frequency induction methods in the range of 500-600 oC. Sintering was performed as 40 min in the traditional method and 5 min in the ultra-high frequency induction sintering method. As a result of the tests carried out in this study, it was determined that pure aluminum samples were successfully sintered with a high frequency induction system in a shorter time than traditional sintering method.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVDAR, U., GÜL, B., GEZİCİ, L. U., AYVAZ, M. (2022). The comparative study of conventional and ultra-high frequency induction sintering behavior of pure aluminum. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 173–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/539327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Deuis, R. L., Subramanian, C., Yellup, J. M., Dry Sliding Wear of Aluminium Composite-A Review. Composites Science and Technology, 1997. 57: p. 415-435
  2. Surappa, M. K., Aluminium Matrix Composites: Challenges and Opportunities. Sadhana, 2003. 28: p. 319-334
  3. Singla, M., Dwivedi, D. D., Singh, L., Chawla, V., Development of Aluminum Based Silicon Carbide Particulate Metal Matrix Composite. Journal of Minerals Materials Characterization & Engineering, 2009. 8(6): p. 455-467
  4. Şimşek, İ, Şimşek, D., Özyürek, D. The effect of diffirent sliding speeds on wear bheavior of ZrO2 reinforcement aluminum matrix composite materials. International Advanced researches and Engineering Journal, 2020. 4(1):p. 1-7
  5. Cetinel, H., Ayvaz, M., The Effect of Aging Parameters and Roughness on the Wear Properties of Aluminum Alloy 6082. Materials Testing, 2014. 56: p. 988-993
  6. Narayan, S., Rajeshkannan, An., Workability Behavior of Powder Metallurgy Carbide Reinforced Aluminum Composites During Hot Forging. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2015. 30: p. 1196-1201
  7. German, R. M., Suri, P., Park, S. J., Review: Liquid Phase Sintering. Journal of Materials Science, 2009. 44(1): p. 1-39
  8. Kehl, W., Fischmeister, H. F., Liquid Phase Sintering of Al-Cu Compacts. Powder Metall, 1980. 23(3): p. 113–119
  9. Oh, M. C., Ahn, B., Effect of Mg Composition on Sintering Behaviours and Mechanical Properties of Al-Cu-Mg Alloy. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014. 24: p.53-58
  10. Schaffer, G. B., Yao, J.-Y., Bonner, S. J., Crossin, E., Pas., S. J., Hill, A. J., The Effect of Tin and Nitrogen on Liquid Phase Sintering of Al-Cu-Mg-Si Alloys. Acta Materialia, 2008. 56: p. 2651-2624
  11. Rudianto, H., Jang, G. J., Yang, S. S., Kim, Y. J., Dlouhy, I., Evaluation of Sintering Behavior of Premix Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Powder. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015. 2015: p. 1-8
  12. Schaffer, G. B., Sercombe, T. B., Lumley, R. N., Liquid Phase Sintering of Aluminium Alloys. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2001. 67: p. 85-91
  13. Gokce, A., Findik, F., Mechanical and Physical Properties of Sintering Aluminum Powders. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufactıring Engineering, 2008. 30(2): p. 157-164
  14. Gokce, A., Findik, F., Kurt, A. O., Effects of Mg content on Aging Behavior of Al4CuxMg PM Alloy. Materials and Design, 2013. 46: p. 524-531
  15. Boland, C. D., Hexemer Jr, R. L., Donaldson, I. W., Bishop, D. P., Industrial Processing of a No