Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Exploring opportunities and challenges of BIM adoption in Kazan’s construction sector

Fuad Abutaha(ANTALYA BİLİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8748-6207
Nurfat Khalautdinov(ANTALYA BİLİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0001-2109-4726
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the survey reveals that adoption of BIM is mainly hindered by internal organizational limitations, high costs, and technical interoperability issues, whereas external factors such as policy support and stakeholder collaboration are seen as less pressing but still relevant to successful BIM integration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traditional methods still occupy an irreplaceable part in the construction industry of the Russian Federation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, due to the development of technology, traditional technologies begin to demonstrate worse results, if new ones are applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the survey reveals that adoption of BIM is mainly hindered by internal organizational limitations, high costs, and technical interoperability issues, whereas external factors such as policy support and stakeholder collaboration are seen as less pressing but still relevant to successful BIM integration.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Building Information Modeling · Construction Industry · Construction Management

Abstract

Traditional methods still occupy an irreplaceable part in the construction industry of the Russian Federation. However, due to the development of technology, traditional technologies begin to demonstrate worse results, if new ones are applied. Building Information Modeling (BIM) is one of the modern technologies that allows us to create an information model for the construction industry, with co-dependent parameters, which avoids large number of human errors when editing parameters, automatically changing them in the order of dependence. Due to the limited consideration of BIM adoption in Kazan, this study aims to assess the implementation of BIM in Kazan in the field of construction industry. The study examines the main factors of BIM integration, both opportunities and barriers. The study is designed to identify the key advantages and barriers of BIM adoption and the opportunities for its application. A mix of qualitative and quantitative questionnaire was adopted for the purpose of the study. Among 215 questionnaires distributed, 178 responses were received. IBM SPSS method was then used for data analysis. The results revealed that among the 30 benefit factors, early visualization of the project and clash detection capabilities are the key benefit factors. Whereas, among the 32 barrier factors, the lack of experience in organizations, software license cost, and imperfect training system are among the most significant challenges of BIM adoption in Kazan. Overall, the survey reveals that adoption of BIM is mainly hindered by internal organizational limitations, high costs, and technical interoperability issues, whereas external factors such as policy support and stakeholder collaboration are seen as less pressing but still relevant to successful BIM integration.

🔖

Cite This Article

Abutaha, F., Khalautdinov, N., Ghayeb, H. H. (2026). Exploring opportunities and challenges of BIM adoption in Kazan’s construction sector. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.1851498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Smith P. BIM Implementation – Global Strategies. Procedia Engineering 2014. 85:482–492. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.575.
  2. Migilinskas D, Popov V, Juocevicius V, Ustinovichius L. The Benefits, Obstacles and Problems of Practical Bim Implementation. Procedia Engineering 2013. 57:767–774. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.097.
  3. Arayici Y, Egbu C,, Coates S. Building information modelling (BIM) implementation and remote construction projects: issues, challenges, and critiques. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 2012. 17, 75–92:75–92.
  4. Khudhair A, Li H, Ren G, Liu S. Towards Future BIM Technology Innovations: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature. Applied Sciences 2021. 11(3):1232. doi:10.3390/app11031232.
  5. Bryde D, Broquetas M, Volm JM. The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management 2013. 31(7):971–980. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001.
  6. Eastman C. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  7. Mahalingam A, Kashyap R, Mahajan C. An evaluation of the applicability of 4D CAD on construction projects. Automation in Construction 2010. 19(2):148–159. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.015.
  8. Turkan Y, Bosche F, Haas CT, Haas R. Automated progress tracking using 4D schedule and 3D sensing technologies. Automation in Construction 2012. 22:414–421. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.10.003.
  9. Burgess M, Wilson C, Fan Y Van. Adoption drivers and barriers of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Europe. Energy and Buildings 2026. 355:116953. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.116953.
  10. Al Aamri AMS, Evdorides H, Baniotopoulos C. Barriers and Opportunities for the Adoption of Building Information Modelling in the Design of Buildings: Case Study of Oman. Sustainability 2025. 17(8):3510. doi:10.3390/su17083510.
  11. Doan DT, Atencio E, Muñoz La Rivera F, Alnajjar O. A Systematic Literature Review of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Offsite Construction (OSC) Integration: Emerging Technologies and Future Trends. Applied Sciences 2025. 15(18):9981. doi:10.3390/app15189981.
  12. Lee S, Yu J, Jeong D. BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations. Journal of Management in Engineering 2015. 31(3). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000252.
  13. Das K, Khursheed S, Paul VK. The impact of BIM on project time and cost: insights from case studies. Discover Materials 2025. 5(1):25. doi:10.1007/s43939-025-00200-2.
  14. Ariono B, Wasesa M, Dhewanto W. The Drivers, Barriers, and Enablers of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Innovation in Developing Countries: Insights from Systematic Literature Review and Comparative Analysis. Buildings 2022. 12(11):1912. doi:10.3390/buildings12111912.
  15. Rinchen S, Banihashemi S, Alkilani S. Driving digital transformation in construction: Strategic insights into building information modelling adoption in developing countries. Project Leadership and Society 2024. 5:100138. doi:10.1016/j.plas.2024.100138.
  16. Geylani Ozlem, H. Attila Dikbas. Resource based view in the Turkish construction sector and resource selection with ANP technique. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 2019. 3.1:40–47.
  17. Oteng D, Ansah MK, Kissi E, Eshun BT. Barriers to the adoption of building information modelling in developing countries: the case of Ghana. In: 1st International Conference on Construction Futures. 2018.
  18. Enshassi A, Lina AH, Sherif M. Barriers to implementation of building information modelling (BIM) in the Palestinian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Project Management 2016. 8(2):103.
  19. Takim R, Harris M, Nawawi AH. Building Information Modeling (BIM): A New Paradigm for Quality of Life Within Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2013. 101:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.175.
  20. Johnson RE, Eberhard SL. Digital innovation and organizational change in design practice. CRS Center, Texas A & M University 2003.
  21. Aranda‐Mena G, Crawford J, Chevez A, Froese T. Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 2009. 2(3):419–434. doi:10.1108/17538370910971063.
  22. Hardin B, Dave M. BIM and construction management: proven tools, methods, and workflows. John Wiley & Sons 2015.
  23. Azhar S, Michael H, Blake S. “Building information modeling: Benefits, risks and challenges.” Proceedings of the 44th ASC National Conference 2008:2–5.
  24. Arayici Y, Coates P, Koskela L, Kagioglou M, Usher C, O’Reilly K. BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices. Structural Survey 2011. 29(1):7–25. doi:10.1108/02630801111118377.
  25. Bahareh G, Elmira Hemmati. Benefits and Barriers of BIM Implementation in Production Phase A case study within a contractor company. 2017.
  26. Criminale A, Langar S. Challenges with BIM implementation: a review of literature. In 53rd ASC annual international conference proceedings 2017:329–335.
  27. Smith DK, & Tardif M. Building information modeling: a strategic implementation guide for architects, engineers, constructors, and real estate asset managers. John Wiley & Sons 2009.
  28. Koseoglu O, Sakin M, Arayici Y. Exploring the BIM and lean synergies in the Istanbul Grand Airport construction project. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 2018. 25(10):1339–1354. doi:10.1108/ECAM-08-2017-0186.
  29. Chien K-F, Wu Z-H, Huang S-C. Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study. Automation in Construction 2014. 45:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.012.
  30. Barnes P, Davies N. BIM in Principle and in Practice. 2014.
  31. Decree No. 331. Government of the Russian Federation, On the mandatory use of information modeling technologies in construction projects financed by the state. Official Internet Portal of Legal Information (pravo.gov.ru) 2021.
  32. Eastman C. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  33. Oteng D, Ansah MK, Kissi E, Eshun BT. Barriers to the adoption of building information modelling in developing countries: the case of Ghana. In: 1st International Conference on Construction Futures. 2018.