Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Effect of post weld heat treatment on P9 and P11 steel weld joints produced by GTAW and SMAW methods

Esin Tuğba Şimşek Çelik(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HAFİK KAMER ÖRNEK MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, ULAŞTIRMA HİZMETLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-2063-7802
Başar Ersegün Çelik(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0002-3015-2553
Şükrü Talaş(AFYON KOCATEPE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING)0000-0002-4721-0844
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, yield strengths of P9 and P11 steels were 323, 287 and 311, 307, respectively increased to 460, 469 and 570, 503MPa respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Post-weld stress-relieving heat treatments are commonly used to improve the mechanical performance of welded steel joints, especially when there is a risk of cracking in the weld zone.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated four different welding configurations using A335 Gr.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, yield strengths of P9 and P11 steels were 323, 287 and 311, 307, respectively increased to 460, 469 and 570, 503MPa respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:P11 · GTAW · SMAW

Abstract

Post-weld stress-relieving heat treatments are commonly used to improve the mechanical performance of welded steel joints, especially when there is a risk of cracking in the weld zone. This study investigated four different welding configurations using A335 Gr. P11 and P9 pipes of different thicknesses. Firstly, an 8.18 mm-thick A335 Gr. P11 pipe was welded using the GTAW process with ER80S-B2 filler metal. Secondly, a 30 mm thick A335 Gr. P11 pipe was welded using a combination of the GTAW (ER80S-B2) and SMAW (E8018-B2) processes. Thirdly, a 20.62 mm thick A335 Gr. P9 pipe was welded using the GTAW (ER80S-B8) and SMAW (E8015-B8) processes and finally, dissimilar welding of P9 and P11 pipes (8.18 mm thick) using the GTAW (ER80S-B8) and SMAW (E8015-B8) processes. The effects of the different base materials and welding methods on the mechanical properties of the joints, as well as other changes that occurred following post weld heat treatment, were systematically evaluated. Mechanical characterization included tensile, bending and hardness tests and positive material identification (PMI) in addition to macrostructural analyses. PWHT process produced steady hardness values in both heat-treated P9 steel welds at 230 HV, whereas, this value was stable at 200HV in P11 steel welds. Similarly, yield strengths of P9 and P11 steels were 323, 287 and 311, 307, respectively increased to 460, 469 and 570, 503MPa respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, E. T. Ş., Çelik, B. E., Talaş, Ş. (2026). Effect of post weld heat treatment on P9 and P11 steel weld joints produced by GTAW and SMAW methods. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.1943003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Masuyama, F., History of Power Plants and Progress in Heat Resistant Steels. ISIJ International. 2001. 41(6): p. 612-625.
  2. Topuz, P., Effect of PWHT on mechanical properties of high temperature and pressure resistant nuclear power plant steel welded with SMAW and GTAW methods. Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science, 2019. 7(3): p. 436-441.
  3. Çiçek, B., Y. Sun, Weldability and service conditions of steels in thermal power plant applications. Journal of Steel Research and Development, 2022. 3(1): p. 25-29.
  4. Kırbas, C., B. Cicek, M. Baydogan and H. Cimenoglu, Effect of stress relief annealing temperature on mechanical properties of AISI P11 and AISI P91 Grade seamless pipe steel, in 2nd International Steel Iron Symposium (IISS’15). 2015. Karabuk.
  5. Pandey, C. and M.M. Mahapatra, P. Kumar and N. Saini, Some studies on P91 steel and their weldments. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018. 743: p. 332-364.
  6. Pandey, C., N. Saini, M.M. Mahapatra and P. Kumar, Study of the fracture surface morphology of impact and tensile tested cast and forged (C&F) Grade 91 steel at room temperature for different heat treatment regimes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016. 71: p. 131-147.
  7. Pandey, C., M.M. Mahapatra, P. Kumar, R.S. Mulik, N. Saini and J.G. Thakre, Effect of welding process and PWHT on δ-ferrite evolution in dissimilar P91 and P92 steel joint. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018. 5: p. 17080–17088.
  8. Kimura, K., H. Kushima, F. Abe and K. Yagi, Inherent creep strength and long term creep strength properties of ferritic steels. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1997. 234-236: p. 1079-1082.
  9. Pandey, C. and M.M. Mahapatra, Effect of long-term ageing on the microstructure and mechanical properties of creep strength enhanced ferritic P91 steel. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2016. 69: p. 1657-1673.
  10. A. Kipelova, R. Kaibyshev, A. Belyakov, D. Molodov, Microstructure evolution in a 3%Co modified P911 heat resistant steel under tempering and creep conditions, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2011. 528(3): p. 1280-1286.
  11. Kunz, L. and P. Lukáš, Cyclic stress-strain behavior of 9Cr1Mo steel at positive mean stress. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2001. 319–321: p. 555-558.
  12. Koo, G.H. and J.H. Lee, Investigation of ratcheting characteristics of modified 9Cr–1Mo steel by using the Chaboche constitutive model. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2007. 84(5): p. 284-292.
  13. Silva, F.J.G., Pinho, A.P., Pereira, A.B., Coutinho Paiva, O., Evaluation of welded joints in P91 steel under different heat-treatment conditions. Metals, 2020. 10(1): 99.
  14. Uygun, A.V., A. Durmuş, A. Bayram. and S. Ülkü, An examination of the mechanical properties of dissimilar steel welds. Materials Testing, 2005. 47(6): p. 324-330.
  15. Polachova, D., M. Svobodova, P. Hajkova and J. Uzel, Comparison of mechanical properties of P91 steel depending on temperature and annealing time, in Proceedings of Comat, 2012. Plzen, Czech Republic, p. 21-22.
  16. Taniguchi, G. and K. Yamashita, Effect of PWHT temperature on mechanical properties of weld metals for High-Cr Ferritic Heat-Resistant Steel. Kobelco Technology Review, 2013. 32: p. 33-39.
  17. Özlü, B., H. Demir, M. Türkmen, S. Gündüz, Examining the machinability of 38MnVS6 microalloyed steel, cooled in different mediums after hot forging with the coated carbide and ceramic tool. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2021. 235(22): p. 6228-6239.
  18. Alan, E., Effect of Nb addition on fatigue properties of V-bearing medium carbon quenched and tempered steels International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 2025. 9(3): p. 153-161.
  19. William, F. and J.R. Newell, Welding and Postweld Heat Treatment of P91 Steels. Welding Journal, 2010. April: p. 33-36.
  20. Arivazhagan, B., S. Sundaresan, M. Kamaraj, A study on influence of shielding gas composition on toughness of flux-cored arc weld of modified 9Cr-Mo(AISI P91) Steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009. 209(12-13): p. 5245-5253.
  21. Ebrahimian, A. and S.S. Ghasemi Banadkouki, Effect of alloying element partitioning on ferrite hardening in a low alloy ferrite-martensite dual phase steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016. 677: p. 281-289.
  22. Şimşek Çelik, E.T., Çelik, B.E., and Talaş, Ş., Investigation on weldability and post-weld heat treatment of A 333 Gr.6 and A350LF-2 steels. Manufacturing Technologies and Applications, 2025. 6(1): p. 111-123.
  23. Penttilä, S., P. Kah, J. Ratava and H. Eskelinen, Artificial neural network controlled GMAW system: Penetration and quality assurance in a multi-pass butt weld application. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019. 105(7): p. 3369-3385.
  24. ASME., BPVC Section IX: Welding, brazing, and fusing qualifications (ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code) [Standart], American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2023.
  25. Khan, M., M.W. Dewan, and M.Z. Sarkar, Effects of welding technique, filler metal and post-weld heat treatment on stainless steel and mild steel dissimilar welding joint. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021. 64: p. 1307-1321.
  26. Nohutçu, S., R. Kaçar, H. Ertek-Emre, Weldability of Haynes 188 Cobalt Based Superalloy and AISI 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel. Journal of Polytechnic, 2024. 27(3): p. 995-1004.
  27. Kara, R., F. Çolak, G. Yıldırım, H.F. Aksu, Effect of Welding Methods and Compound Reinforcement Used in Joining Natural Gas Pipes on Weld Strength. Journal of Materials and Mechatronics: A, 2023. 4(2): p. 588-597.