SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 9

Recreational Importance and Reasons for being Preferred of Countryman Coffee Stall as Commu

Kamusal Bir Mekân Olan Memleket Kahvelerinin Tercih Edilme Nedenleri ve Rekreasyonel Önemia

FAİK ARDAHAN
Pages
49–69
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the process of assessing data the descriptive statistic methods, One Way ANOVA and Independent samples T test have been used, results have been assessed according to significant level 0.05

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to determine the factors which have effect on motivation of the individuals to go to Countryman Coffee Stall and the recreational importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sampling group consist of 100 volunteer participants which selected randomly by using simple random sampling method among participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the process of assessing data the descriptive statistic methods, One Way ANOVA and Independent samples T test have been used, results have been assessed according to significant level 0.05
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the factors which have effect on motivation of the individuals to go to Countryman Coffee Stall and the recreational importance. Sampling group consist of 100 volunteer participants which selected randomly by using simple random sampling method among participants. The questionaire form includes demographics variables, and the motivational factors which effects participants to go Countrman coffee stall. In the process of assessing data the descriptive statistic methods, One Way ANOVA and Independent samples T test have been used, results have been assessed according to significant level 0.05

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı; Antalya kent merkezinde yer alan memleket kahvelerinin tercih edilme nedenlerinin ve rekreasyonel öneminin belirlenmesidir. Örneklem memleket kahvelerine gidilen zamanda orada olan ve aralarından tesadüfi olarak seçilmiş toplam 100 kişiden (bir kadın 99 erkek) oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada demografik verilerin alındığı sorulara ilave olarak bireylerin memleket kahvelerine neden gittiklerine dönük maddelerin yer aldığı anket formu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistiki yöntemler yanında karşılaştırmalarda ANOVA testi ve bağımsız örneklerde T Test kullanılmış ve sonuçlar 0.05 anlamlılık düzeyinde değerlendirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ARDAHAN, F. (2022). Recreational Importance and Reasons for being Preferred of Countryman Coffee Stall as Commu. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 9, 49–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/538992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akkar Ercan, Z.M.(2007). Public Spaces of Post-industrial Cities and Their Changing roles (1). METU JFA. 24(1):115-137.
  2. Aktaş, G.G. (2011) Public Life in Anatolia and Its Spatial Impresses. GSF Art and Design Journal [ in Turkish: GSF Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi], 7: 55-68.
  3. Anderson, L. (1998) Loneliness Research and Interventions: A review of the literature, Aging & Mental Health, 2(4): 264-274.
  4. Ardahan, F. (2014). The Impacts of Social Capital and Some Demographic Variables on Life Satisfaction: Antalya, Kamla-Raj, Anthropologist, 18(3): 765-776.
  5. Ardahan, F. (2015a). Recreational Importance of Village Coffee Stall as Communal Place. Wulfenia Journal, 22(3): 366-378. Ardahan Faik, (2015b). The Factors Effecting Participants to Go to Coffee Stalls and City Center Cafes: Antalya Case. Kasmera Journal, 43(1): 6- 17. Ardahan, F. ve Lapa T.Y. (2011). Açık alan rekreasyonu: bisiklet kullanıcı- ları ve yürüyüşçülerin doğa sporu yapma nedenleri ve elde ettikleri faydalar. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1): 1327-1341.
  6. Ardahan, F. ve Mert, M. (2013). The validity and reliability of motivational factors scale and the benefits scale of participating in trekking activi- ties for Turkish population. International Journal of Human Scien- ces, 10(2): 338-355.
  7. Ardahan, F. ve Mert, M. (2014). Profile of the Bike Users and Evaluation of Motivational Factors for Cycling with Respect to Some Demog- raphic Variables: Example from Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri, J Sports Sci, 6(2):53-67.
  8. Ayata, A.G. (1991).
  9. Gecekondularda Kimlik Sorunu, Dayanışma Örüntüle- ri ve Hemsehrilik. Toplum ve Bilim, 51-52:89-101.
  10. Bal, H. (2003).
  11. Kentsel Yapı ve Kentleşme Süreci, Fakülte Kitapevi, Ispar- ta. Bilgin, N. (2007). Kimlik İnşası. Aşina Kitapları. İzmir.
  12. Brill, M. (1989).
  13. Transformation, Nostalgia and Illusion in Public Life and Perublic Place, Public Places and Spaces. Ed. I. Altman ve E. Zube. NewYork: Plenium Press.
  14. Carr, D. (1991). Minds in Museums and Libraries- The Cognitive Mana- gement of Cultural Institutions, Teachers College Record 93.(1):6-27.
  15. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L.G. ve Stone, A.M. (1992) Public Space. Cambridge University Press,
  16. Cambridge. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
  17. Corbin, H. (1970) Recreation Leadership. 3th Edition, New York: Prenti- ce-Hall Inc. Crandall, R., (1980) Motivation for leisure. Journal of Leisure Research,(12)1: 45-54.
  18. Francis, M. (1989). Control as a Dimension of Public-