SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 18

An Examination of Correlation between Cultural Intelligence Level and Aggression

Kültürel Zeka Seviyesi ve Saldırganlık Arasındaki Korelasyonun İncelenmesi

Aysun DOĞUTAŞ
Pages
277–296
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the Spearman’s correlation results, there is a significant association between the total intelligence level and total aggression level which was an expected result.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine if there is any correlation between cultural intelligence and aggression levels of teacher candidates studying at a university in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants of the study were 214 teacher candidates graduated and enrolled pedagogical formation classes on 2016-2017 academic years. 146 %71,9 were women and 57 % 28,1 were men of the study group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the Spearman’s correlation results, there is a significant association between the total intelligence level and total aggression level which was an expected result.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kültürel zeka · saldırganlık · saldırganlık seviyesi

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if there is any correlation between cultural intelligence and aggression levels of teacher candidates studying at a university in Turkey. Participants of the study were 214 teacher candidates graduated and enrolled pedagogical formation classes on 2016-2017 academic years. 146 %71,9 were women and 57 % 28,1 were men of the study group. Both the Cultural Intelligence Scale CQS and the Buss-Perry Aggression Scale BPAS were applied together. Results of frequencies showed that motivation subdimension of cultural intelligence is the highest on Turkish teacher candidates, while metacognitive subdimension is the lowest. According to the Spearman’s correlation results, there is a significant association between the total intelligence level and total aggression level which was an expected result.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki bir üniversitede okuyan öğretmen adaylarının kültürel zeka ve saldırganlık seviyeleri arasında ilişki olup olmadığını belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini mezun ve 2016-2017 akademik yılında pedagojik formasyon programına devam eden 214 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma grubunun 146 %71,9 sı kadın ve 57 %28,1 si erkektir. Kültürel Zeka Ölçeği CIS ve Buss-Perry Saldırganlık Ölçeği BPAS birlikte uygulanmıştır. Frekans sonuçları, Türk öğretmen adaylarının kültürel zeka seviyesinin davranış alt boyutunun en yüksek olduğu aynı zamanda üstbiliş altboyutunun ise en düşük olduğunu göstermiştir. Spearman’ın korelasyon sonuçlarına göre toplam kültürel zeka seviyesi ile toplam saldırganlık seviyesi arasında beklenen bir sonuç olarak anlamlı bir ilişki vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞUTAŞ, A. (2022). An Examination of Correlation between Cultural Intelligence Level and Aggression. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 18, 277–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/538740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alon, I. & Higgins, J.M. (2005). Global leadership success through emotional and cultural intelligences. Business Horizons, 48(6), 501- 512. Ang, S. & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of cultural intelli- gence: Definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theo- ry, Measurement, and Applications (pp. 3–15).
  2. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C. K. S., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C. et al. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3, 335– 371. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Yee, N.K. & Koh, C. (2004). The measurement of cultural intelligence. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA. Allison, P.D. (2001). Missing Data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Balkaya, F. & Şahin, N.H. (2003).
  3. Çok Boyutlu Öfke Ölçeği, Türk Psiki- yatri Dergisi, 14 (3), 192-202.
  4. Ballard C. G., Jacoby R., Del Ser T., Khan M. N., Munoz D. G., Holmes C., Nagy Z., Perry E. K., Joachim C., Jaros E., O’Brien J. T., Perry R. H., McKeith I. G. (2004). Neuropathological substrates of psy- chiatric symptoms in prospectively studied patients with autop- sy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies. Am. J. Psychiatry, 161, 84 84910.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.843 Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: Asocial learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in a cultural context. Ap- plied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269–290.
  5. Benson, E. (2003). Intelligent intelligence testing. Monitor, 34(2), 48-51.
  6. Brislin, R., Worthley, R., & MacNab, B. (2006). Cultural intelligence: Understanding behaviors that serve people’s goals. Group & Or- ganization Management, 31(1), 40-55.
  7. Budak, S. (2003).
  8. Psikoloji Sözlüğü, Ankara:Bilim Ve Sanat Yayınları.
  9. Buss, A. H. & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(4), 343-349.
  10. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Demirtas Madran, H. (2012). Reliability and validity of buss-perry aggression questionnaire-turkish version. Turk Psychiatry Journal, 23. Earley, P.C. (2002). Redefining interactions across cultures and organi- zations: Moving