Journals / Human Rights Review / 2016 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 11

WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM ATTITUDE TO WARDS TO İNTERPRET COMPLEX LEGAL TEXTS OF WTO IN CONNECTION WITH ITS CREATIVE INTERPRETATIVE ROLE WITH ITS CONSERVATIVE PRESERVATIVE ROLE

Dünya Ticaret Örgütü Anlaşmazlık Çözüm Sisteminin Muğlak Mevzuat Hükümlerini Uygulama Sırasındaki Yaracatıcı Yorumlama Rolü ve Koruyucu Tefsir Rolü

Pages
165–180
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It will be seen cleary in this article how Dispute settlement system tries to keep balance between these two roles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It states in Article 3 of Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes that the dispute settlement system of the WTO is a central element of to the multilateral trading system and recommendations and rulings of the DSB cannot add to or diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered agreements.To what extend it is possible to interpret covered agreements of WTO in an attempt to clarify their meaning without diminishing or adding any rights and obligations the legal texts generate, and how does the dispute settlement system keep balance between its creative interpretative role and its conservative preservative role.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The dispute settlement system process and objects, difficulty of interpretation, interpretation principles and rules which are important for Dispute Settlement system when they clarify legal texts meaning are considered in this article.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It will be seen cleary in this article how Dispute settlement system tries to keep balance between these two roles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It states in Article 3 of Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes that the dispute settlement system of the WTO is a central element of to the multilateral trading system and recommendations and rulings of the DSB cannot add to or diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered agreements.To what extend it is possible to interpret covered agreements of WTO in an attempt to clarify their meaning without diminishing or adding any rights and obligations the legal texts generate, and how does the dispute settlement system keep balance between its creative interpretative role and its conservative preservative role. The dispute settlement system process and objects, difficulty of interpretation, interpretation principles and rules which are important for Dispute Settlement system when they clarify legal texts meaning are considered in this article. It will be seen cleary in this article how Dispute settlement system tries to keep balance between these two roles.

Özet

Dünya Ticaret Örgütü (DTÖ) anlaşmazlık mutabakat metninin 3. Maddesine gore Uyuşmazlık çözüm sistemi DTÖ’nün merkezinde yer alan bir sistem olarak hukuki metinlerde yer alan hak ve sorumlulukları azaltamaz ve arttıramaz. DTÖ’nün muğlak anlaşma hükümlerine, bu hükümlerin oluşturduğu hakları ve sorumlulukları arttırıp azaltmadan yorum yapabilmesi ne ölçüde mümkündür, ve bunu yaparken Dünya Ticaret Örgütü uyuşmazlık çözüm sistemi, yaratıcılık rolü ve koruyuculuk rolü arasındaki dengeyi nasıl oluşturucak. Uyuşmazlık çözüm sisteminin süreci, hedefi, yorumlamalardaki zorluklar, yorum prensipleri ve kuralları, hukuki hükümlerin anlamlarını açıklamada önemli bir yer tutmaktadır.Uyuşmazlık çözüm sisteminin bu iki rolü arasındaki dengeyi nasıl kurduğu makalede açıkça görülebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOĞALAN, M. (2022). WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM ATTITUDE TO WARDS TO İNTERPRET COMPLEX LEGAL TEXTS OF WTO IN CONNECTION WITH ITS CREATIVE INTERPRETATIVE ROLE WITH ITS CONSERVATIVE PRESERVATIVE ROLE. Human Rights Review, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 11, 165–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/538194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. United States- Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporation” WT/DS108/AB/R United States-Tax Treatment for ‘Foreign Sales Corporations’ WT/DS108/R United States — Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan WT/DS244/AB/R United States- Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline WT/ DS2/AB/R, p.23 United States- Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline WT/ DS2/AB/R United States- Sections 301-310 of the Trade Act of 1974 WT/DS152/R Unite States-Measure Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India WT/DS33/AB/R United States- Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products WT/ DS58/AB/R United States- Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology WT/DS350/AB/R United States- Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan WT/DS184/AB/R United States- Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline WT/ DS2/AB/R Mexico — Anti-Dumping Investigation of High-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) from the United States WT/DS132/AB/RW Japan-Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages WT/DS10/AB/R European Communities-Measures Affecting Meat and Meat Products WT/ DS26/AB/R European Communities- Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas III WT/DS27/AB/R Korea- Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products WT/DS98/R Chile-Price Band System and Safeguard Measures Relating to Certain Agricultural Products WT/DS207/AB/R Canada-Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry WT/DS142/R(EC) Canada- Patent Protection Term WT/DS170/1 Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, 1988 The Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation, 1994 The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 General Agreement on Tariff and Trade, 1994 Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994, 1994 World Trade Organisation, n.d. Understanding the Wto: Settling Disputes [online] World Trade Organisation.Available at: http: //www.wto.org/english/ thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/disp1_e.htm [accessed 22nd April 2014].
  2. Wilson, B., 2005. The WTO Dispute Settlement System and its Operation: a brief overview of the first ten years. In: Rufus, Y., Bruce, W., Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement the First Ten Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp.15-25.
  3. Weil, G., 1997.
  4. As cited in. Waincymer, J., 2010. WTO Litigation Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement. London: Cameron May Ltd