Journals / Human Rights Review / 2016 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 11

THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM THE ADOPTION OF CHARTER OF ALLIANCE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT IN TURKISH CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM

Sened-i İttifak’ın Kabulünden Anayasa Şikayeti Kurumunun Kabulüne Kadar İnsan Haklarının Türk Anayasal Sistemindeki Gelişim Süreci

Pages
95–146
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, some remarkable decisions, which have a broad repercussion in world press, made by the Constitutional Court of Turkey will be addressed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The constitutional movement commenced by the adoption of the Charter of Alliance has continued until today despite the interruptions occurred at certain times.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, the 200-year-evolution and position of human rights and freedoms in Turkish Constitutional System will be dealt with and critically evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, some remarkable decisions, which have a broad repercussion in world press, made by the Constitutional Court of Turkey will be addressed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The constitutional movement commenced by the adoption of the Charter of Alliance has continued until today despite the interruptions occurred at certain times. Not only have state organisations regulated under these constitutions, but also human rights and freedoms have been regulated and guaranteed. It can be observed that human rights and freedoms, which were just listed by names in the previous constitutions, are regulated in depth under the last two constitutions. The absence of a proper academic study analysing the evolution of human rights under Turkish constitutions underlies the production of this article. In this regard, the 200-year-evolution and position of human rights and freedoms in Turkish Constitutional System will be dealt with and critically evaluated. Also the current situation reached by the introduction of the institution of ‘Constitutional Complaint’ will be examined in depth by making comparisons to the countries such as Germany, Spain, Austria, Switzerland, Hungary where the institution has successfully been applied for a long time. Finally, some remarkable decisions, which have a broad repercussion in world press, made by the Constitutional Court of Turkey will be addressed.

Özet

Senedi İttifak’ın kabulüyle başlayan anayasacılık hareketleri belli dönemlerde yaşanan kesintilere rağmen günümüze kadar sürmüştür. Kabul edilen anayasal belgeler ve anayasalarla sadece devlet teşkilatı düzenlenmemiş, aynı zamanda diğer dünya devletlerinde olduğu gibi, insan hak ve hürriyetleri de bu belgelerde koruma altına alınmıştır. Ancak başlarda yalnızca anayasalarda listelenmekle yetinilen hak ve hürriyetlerin, artık günümüzde teferruatlı bir şekilde düzenlendiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı literatürde, insan hak ve hürriyetlerinin Türk Anayasa ve anayasal belgelerindeki evrim sürecini analiz eden derli toplu bir çalışmanın eksikliğini gidermeye katkıda bulunmaktır. Bu bağlamda, temel hak ve hürriyetlerin sistemimiz içerisindeki 200 yıllık evrim süreci derinlemesine ele alınmaya çalışılacak ve Anayasal sistemimizdeki insan haklarının, tarihsel süreçte bulunmuş olduğu konumlar eleştirel bir biçimde değerlendirilecektir. Ayrıca “Anayasa Şikâyeti” kurumunun kabulü ile gelinen son nokta, Almanya, İspanya, Avusturya, İsviçre, Macaristan gibi Anayasa şikâyeti kurumunu uzun yıllardır örnek bir şekilde uygulayan ülkeler ile kıyaslamalar yapılarak derinlemesine değerlendirilecektir. Son olarak, Türk Anayasa Mahkemesinin Anayasa şikâyeti kapsamında vermiş olduğu ve dünya basınında geniş yer bulan bir takım önemli kararlara da değinilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, A. (2022). THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM THE ADOPTION OF CHARTER OF ALLIANCE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT IN TURKISH CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM. Human Rights Review, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 11, 95–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/538195

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. The World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, 1993 The United Nations Charter, 1945 The Turkish Penal Code of 1926 The Turkish Constitution of 1982 The Turkish Constitution of 1961 The Turkish Constitution of 1924 The Turkish Constitution of 1921 The Ottoman Reform Edict, 1859 The Ottoman Basic Law of 1876 Organic Law 2/1979 on the Constitutional Court of Spain, 1979 The Imperial Edict of Gülhane, 1839 The Constitution of Spain, 1978 The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1949 The Constitution of Austria, 1991 The Charter of Alliance, 1808 Law No. 5651 on Regulating Broadcasting in the Internet and Fighting against Crimes Committed Through Internet Broadcasting, 2008 Law No: 2577, Code of Administrative Procedure, 1982 Law on the Establishment and Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of Turkey, 22 April 1962, the law no: 44 Federal Constitutional Court Act of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1951 of Turkey, 30 March 2011, the law no: 6216 Federal Constitutional Court Act of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1951 European Convention on Human Rights, 1950
  2. Council of Europe Venice Commission, Draft Study on Individual Access to Constitutional Justice, CDL-JU(2010)018rev, 11 October 2010 Additional Protocols No 7 to the ECHR, 1984 Additional Protocols No 4 to the ECHR, 1963 YouTube LLC Corporation Service Company v. Turkey [2014] (2014/4705) (The Judgement of the Constitutional Court of Turkey) Twitter v. Turkey [2014] (2014/3986) (The Judgement of the Constitutional Court of Turkey) Mustafa Ali Balbay v. Turkey [2013] (2012/1272) (The Judgement of the Constitutional Court of Turkey) Marbury v. Madison [1803] 5 US 137 Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland (27644/95) [2001] 31 E.H.R.R. 13 Yeginsu Ceylan, 2014. Turkey Lifts Twitter Ban after Court Calls It Illegal. The New York Times. [Online]. (s.l.): Guardian. Available at: http: //www.nytimes. com/2014/04/04/world/middleeast/turkey-lifts-ban-on-twitter.html?_r=1. [Accessed: 11th August 2014].
  3. Yazıcı Serap, Yeni bir Anayasa Hazırlığı ve Türkiye Seçkincilikten Toplum Sözleşmesine, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları: İstanbul, 2009.
  4. Yanık Murat, Yargının Yönetimi ve Denetimi, Der Yayınları: İstanbul, 2014.
  5. Ulvan Nazlı Can, Constitutional Complaint and Individual Complaint in Turkey, Ankara Bar Review, 2, 2013, pp. 179- 186. Tülen Hikmet, “03.10.2001 Tarihli ve 4709 Sayılı Kanunla Yapılan Anayasa Değişiklikleri Üzerine Genel Bir Değerlendirme”, Atat