Journals / History Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Tanrı tarafından dünyanın yarısının kaderini tayin için belirlenenler:‖ Amerika birleşik devletleri ve Rusya‘nın sıradışı sömürgecilikleri

Marked out by the will of heaven to sway the destinies of half the globe:” The peculiar ımperialism of the united states and russia1

Pages
113–136
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to fill this gap in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is argued in this paper that during the era of global imperialism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, while nations like Great Britain, France, and other European powers were amassing far-flung overseas empires, the United States and Russia engaged in a different form of imperialism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Scholarship, especially since 1980, has characterized U.S. expansion from the initial 13 colonies on the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific coast explicitly as imperialistic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to fill this gap in the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is argued in this paper that during the era of global imperialism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, while nations like Great Britain, France, and other European powers were amassing far-flung overseas empires, the United States and Russia engaged in a different form of imperialism. In the United States, what has traditionally been characterized as ―frontier expansion,‖ and not as ―imperialism,‖ has more recently been re- cast. Scholarship, especially since 1980, has characterized U.S. expansion from the initial 13 colonies on the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific coast explicitly as imperialistic. Similarly, recent scholarship on Russian expansion has also questioned both pre-revolutionary and Soviet claims that this also was not imperialistic. What scholars have not addressed are the parallels between American and Russian expansionist regimes with a view to characterizing how overland imperialism was different in its motivations and outcomes from the more traditional overseas imperialism engaged in by other contemporary expansionist powers. This article aims to fill this gap in the literature.

Özet

Bu makale küresel sömürgecilik dönemi olarak bilinen 18. ve 19. yüzyıl‘da İngiltere, Fransa ve diğer Avrupa güçleri geniş deniz aşırı imparatorluklar kurarken Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Rusya‘nın sıradışı bir sömürgeciliğe giriştikleri tezini savunmaktadır. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri‘nde geleneksel olarak ―sömürgecilik‖ değil de ―sınır genişletme‖ olarak adlandırılan sınıflandırma yakın zamanda yeniden tanımlanmışdır. Özellikle 1980‘den sonraki araştırmalar ABD‘nin ilk kuruluşunu teşkil eden Atlantik Okyanusu kıyısındaki 13 koloniden Pasifik Okyanusu kıyılarına kadar yayılmasını açıkça sömürgecilik olarak nitelendirmektedirler. Benzer şekilde yakın dönemde Rus yayılmacılığı üzerine yapılan araştırmalar gerek Rusya devrimi öncesinde gerekse Sovyet Rusya döneminde Rus yayılmacılığının sömürgecilik olmadığı iddialarını sorgulamaktadırlar. Araştırmacıların üzerinde durmadığı önemli bir konu Amerikan ve Rus yayılmacı rejimleri arasındaki benzerlikler ve bu kara sömürgeciliği türünün amaçları ve sonuçları itibariyle diğer yayılmacı güçlerin uyguladığı geleneksel deniz aşırı sömürgecilikten farklılıklarıdır. Bu makale literatürdeki bu boşluğu doldurmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MILLER, C. L. (2022). Tanrı tarafından dünyanın yarısının kaderini tayin için belirlenenler:‖ Amerika birleşik devletleri ve Rusya‘nın sıradışı sömürgecilikleri. History Studies, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 113–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/537383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ANDERSON, Benedict R. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.
  2. ANDERSON, Rani-Henrik. The Lakota Ghost Dance of 1890. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. ANON. ―Russia and Her Serfs.‖ Graham's American Monthly Magazine of Literature, Art, and Fashion, April 1, 1853, 500. ANON. ―The American Squatter and Federal Land Policy.‖ Journal of the West 14 (1975): 72- 83. BASSIN, Mark. ―Turner, Solov‘ev, and the ‛Frontier Hypothesis‘: The Nationalist Signification of Open Spaces.‖ Journal of Modern History 65 (1993), 473-511.
  3. BEECHER, Lyman. A Plea for the West. Cincinnati: Truman & Smith, 1835. BENTON, Thomas Hart. ―Address before Congress, January 3, 1825.‖ In U.S. Congress, Abridgment of Debates of Congress from 1789 to 1856, 8:197. BILLINGTON, Ray Allen. Westward Expansion: A History of the American Frontier. Third Edition. New York: Macmillan 1967.
  4. BILLINGTON, Ray Allen and Martin Ridge. Westward Expansion: A History of the American Frontier. Sixth Edition. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2001.
  5. BREYFOGLE, Nicholas B. ―Building Doukhoboriia: Religious Culture, Social Identity and Russian Colonization in Transcaucasia, 1845-1895.‖ Canadian Ethnic Studies 27 (1995): 24-51.
  6. BREYFOGLE, Nicholas B. ―Caught in the Crossfire? Russian Sectarians in the Caucasian Theater of War, 1853-56 and 1877-78.‖ Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 2 (2001): 713-750.
  7. BREYFOGLE, Nicholas B. Heretics and Colonizers: Forging Russia's Empire in the South Caucasus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.
  8. BURNHAM, Michelle. ―The Periphery Within: Internal Colonialism and the Rhetoric of U.S. Nation Building.‖ In Messy Beginnings; Postcoloniality and Early American Studies. Edited by Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2003, 139-154.
  9. BUSH, Barbara. Imperialism and Postcolonialism. Harlow, England: Pearson/Longman, 2006.
  10. CALHOUN, John C. ―Secretary of war, to House Committee on Military Affairs, 29 December 1829.‖ American State Papers: Military Affairs, 2:33-34.
  11. CARSTENSEN, Vernon. The Public Lands; Studies in the History of the Public Domain. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.
  12. COLLINS, D. N. ―Russia's Conquest of Siberia: Evolving Russian and Soviet Historical Interpretations.‖ European Studies Review 12 (1982): 18-43.
  13. COMAROFF, Jean and John L. Comaroff, eds. Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Chicago: University of Chi