SavedAdd your journal

Journals / History Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Orta doğu bilgisinin orta doğu'da üretilmesi

Producing knowledge of the middle east in the middle east

Muammer ÖZTÜRK
Pages
289–299
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes with a brief analysis of the present performance of the Middle East regarding theory generation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:his article’s departure point is the need for new theories of International Relations to analyze and elaborate a new picture of the Middle East.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Middle East has often been regarded as a region characterized by rapid and continuous change and instability, and accordingly defined as a laboratory of events.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes with a brief analysis of the present performance of the Middle East regarding theory generation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

his article’s departure point is the need for new theories of International Relations to analyze and elaborate a new picture of the Middle East. The Middle East has often been regarded as a region characterized by rapid and continuous change and instability, and accordingly defined as a laboratory of events. Therefore, it is a task of the intellectuals and academicians of the Middle East to produce some indigenous (local) theories which will contribute to casting and understanding a new picture of the Middle East. This article also stresses the need for new theories of International Relations in order to better grasp ever-changing world affairs. The article concludes with a brief analysis of the present performance of the Middle East regarding theory generation.

Özet

Bu makale, Orta Doğu hakkında gerçekçi bir anlamlandırma ve analiz için yeni uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerine ihtiyaç olduğu vurgusunu merkeze almaktadır. Orta Doğu’nun çoğunlukla hızlı ve sürekli değişimlerin yaşandığı ve istikrarsızlığın hakim olduğu bir coğrafya olarak tanımlandığına şahit olunmaktadır. Bu makalede, bugünün hızlı değişimler dünyasını anlamak ve anlamlandırmak için mevcut uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerinin kapasitesinin ötesinde, teoriler kurmak gerektirdiğine işaret edilmektedir. Hadise zengini dinamik Orta Doğu coğrafyasının gerçekçi bir fotoğrafının sunulmasında, şüphesiz asıl katkıyı bölge kaynaklı (yerel) teoriler sağlayacaktır. Bölge kaynaklı (yerel) teorilerin geliştirilmesi, Orta Doğu’lu akademisyen ve aydınları bekleyen bir görevdir. Bu makale, Orta Doğu’nun teori inşa etme yönüyle mevcut performansının kısa bir tahlili ile nihayete ermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, M. (2022). Orta doğu bilgisinin orta doğu'da üretilmesi. History Studies, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 289–299. https://ajindex.com/articles/537308

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ACHCAR, Gilbert (2004) „Greater Middle East: the US plan,‟ Le Monde diplomatique (English Edition) April. Available at http://mondediplo.com/2004/04/04world, accessed March 22, 2010.
  2. BERGER, Lars (2009) „Between New Hopes and Old Realities – The Obama Administration and the Middle East,‟ Orient, II, pp. 22-35.
  3. BRILL, James A. (1996) „The Study of Middle East Politics, 1946-1996. A Stocktaking,‟ The Middle East Journal, 4, Autumn, pp. 501-512.
  4. Der Spiegel (2010) „Afghanistan: Der Friedhof der Supermächte‟ [Afghanistan: the Graveyard of Superpowers], 4. Available at http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-68785446.html, accessed February 20, 2010.
  5. DERİNGİL, Selim (1992) „II. Abdülhamid Döneminde Osmanlı Dış İlişkilerinde Imaj Saplantısı‟ [The Image Obsession in the Foreign Relations during the Era of Sultan Abdulhamid II], Sultan II. Abdülhamid ve Devri Semineri, Bildiriler [Proceedings of the Seminar on Sultan Abdulhamid II and his Era], 27-29 Mayıs/May 27-29, (Istanbul: Istanbul Üniversitesi Yayinlari), pp. 149-162.
  6. DEUTSCHE Welle (2010) Ein Jahr Obama - gemischte Bilanz aus deutscher Sicht [One year with Obama – a mixed balance sheet], January 19. Available at http://www.dw- world.de/dw/article/0,,5147679,00.html, accessed January 19, 2010.
  7. HAASS, Richard N. (2006) „The New Middle East,‟ in Foreign Affairs, 85, 6, November/December 2006, pp. 2-11.
  8. HAASS, Richard N. (2007) „The New Middle East,‟ Newsweek, January 8, p. 18. Available at http://www.newsweek.com/2007/01/07/the-new-middle-east.html, accessed April 20, 2010.
  9. HALLIDAY, Fred (1995) „International Relations and Its Discontents,‟ International Affairs, 71 (4), pp. 733-746.
  10. HALLIDAY, Fred (2009) „International Relations in a post-hegemonic age,‟ International Affairs, 85 (1), pp. 37-51.
  11. HIPPLER, Jochen/Hanrath, Jan (2009) „Die U.S.-amerikanische Politik im Nahen Osten und Mittleren Osten unter Präsident Barack Obama‟ [the U.S. Politics in the Near and Middle East during the Era of President Obama], Orient, II, pp. 56-66.
  12. HOWARD, Michael (1991) „Ideology and International Relations,‟ Howard, Michael Edt. (1991) Lessons of the History, (New Haven & London: Yale University Press), pp. 139-151.
  13. HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. (1996)
  14. Der Kampf der Kulturen, The Clash of Civilisations. Die Neugestaltung der Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert (aus dem Amerikan. Holger Flieesbach), (München-Wien: Europa Verlag). KEPEL, Gilles (2006) Fitne. İslam’ın Merkezinde Savaş, [Sedition: War in the Heart of Islam] Çev./Trans.: Mahmut