Journals / History Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Stephanephoria in Asia Minor in the Light of Inscriptions

Yazıtlar Işığında Küçükasya’da Stephanephoria

Pages
197–205
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, as stated in the inscriptions, the realization of philanthropy-philosophy could be the subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article focuses on the stephanephoros with the tasks, activities and positions of officials in urban life through the inscriptions published from Asia Minor during the Hellenistic and Roman Imperial periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ionia and Caria region present more data than others.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, as stated in the inscriptions, the realization of philanthropy-philosophy could be the subject.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article focuses on the stephanephoros with the tasks, activities and positions of officials in urban life through the inscriptions published from Asia Minor during the Hellenistic and Roman Imperial periods. Ionia and Caria region present more data than others. Despite the fact that there are a large number of inscriptions, the inscriptions documented as eponymous officials have not been included in the article. The cultic inscriptions-decrees from Hellenistic period provide important informations about the functions of the stephanephoroi and the content of the organisations. It’s clear that when we consider their activities and obligations, those who undertake this office belong to the most prominent families of the cities. As well as being in many cities, it was expected that wealthy citizens should aspire to such prestigious civil servants. Thus, as stated in the inscriptions, the realization of philanthropy-philosophy could be the subject.

Özet

Makalede Hellenistik ve Roma İmparatorluk dönemlerinde Küçük Asya’dan yayınlanmış yazıtlarvasıtasıyla stephanephoros’ların görevleri, faaliyetleri, memurların kent yaşamındaki konumları gibihususlara odaklanılmaktadır. Epigrafik veriler bilhassa Ionia ve Karia bölgelerindeyoğunlaşmaktadır. Çok fazla sayıda olmasına rağmen makalede epoynmos memurların belgelendiğiyazıtlara yer verilmemiştir. Hellenistik Dönem’in kült içerikli uzun şekilde kaleme alınankararnameleri özellikle organizasyonların içeriği ve stephanephoros’ların fonksiyonu hakkındaönemli bilgiler vermektedir. Yükümlülükleri, faaliyetleri göz önüne alındığında, bu memuriyetesoyunan kişilerin kentlerinin son derece önde gelen ailelerine mensup oldukları anlaşılmaktadır. Pekçok kent memuriyetinde olduğu gibi böyle prestijli memuriyetlere varlıklı vatandaşların talip olmasıbeklenmekteydi. Böylelikle, yazıtlarda da ifade edildiği gibi, ünseverlik-philotimia’nın gerçekleşmesisöz konusu olabilecekti.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDİL, N. G. (2022). Stephanephoria in Asia Minor in the Light of Inscriptions. History Studies, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 197–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/536946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. BLÜMEL, Wolfgang, Die Inschriften von IasosI-II, (IK 28,1-2), Bonn 1985.
  2. BLÜMEL, Wolfgang, Die Inschriften von Mylasa. Teil 1 (IK 34), Bonn 1987.
  3. BUCKLER, William Hepburn – William Moir Calder, Monuments and Documents from Phrygia and Caria (MAMA VI), Manchester 1939.
  4. CHANIOTIS, Angelos, “Sich selbst feiern? Staedtische Feste des Hellenismus im Spannungsfeld von Religion und Politik”, şurada: P. Zanker–M. Wörrle (Hg.), Stadtbild und Bürgerbild im Hellenismus, München 1995, 147-172.
  5. CHANIOTIS, Angelos, “The Molpoi Inscription: Ritual Prescription or Riddle?”, Kernos 23, 2010, 1-6.
  6. COX, Christopher W. M. –Archibald Cameron, Monuments from Dorylaeum et Nacolea. (MAMA V), Epigraphic Bibliography and Concordance of the DorylaeumNacolea Area, Manchester 1937.
  7. DIGNAS, Beate, “Porter la couronne d’un dieu: titre civique, chargereligieuse, pouvoir ou fardeau ?”, Kernos 20, 2007, 173-187.
  8. DMITRIEV, Sviatoslav, City Government in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor, Oxford 2005.
  9. HERMANN, Peter, “Zwei Inschriften von Kaunos und Baba Dag”, Opuscula Atheniensia10, 1971, 36–39.
  10. Hiller von GAERTRINGEN, Friedrich, Die Inschriften von Priene, Berlin 1908.
  11. KAWERAU, Georg –Albert Rehm, Milet I,3:Das Delphinion in Milet, Berlin 1914.
  12. KERN, Otto, Die Inschriften von Magnesia am Maeander, Berlin 1900.
  13. Le BAS, Philippe – William Henry Waddington, Inscriptions grecques et latines recueillies en Asie Mineure. Voyage archéologique en Grèce et en Asie Mineure. Inscriptions Tome III, Hildesheim 1972.
  14. LEGRAND, Philippe Ernest – Joseph Chamonard, “Inscriptions de Phrygie”, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 17, 1893, 241-293.
  15. MACRO, Anthony D., “The Cities of Asia Minor under the Roman Imperium”, ANRW 2, 1980, 658–697.
  16. PARIS, Pierre – Maurice Holleaux, “Inscriptions de Carie”, Bulletin de correspondence hellénique 9, 1885, 324-348.
  17. PETZL, Georg, Die Inschriften von Smyrna (I.K. 24/1), Bonn 1987.
  18. POLJAKOV, Fjodor B., Die Inschriften von Tralleis und Nysa (I.K. 36/1), Bonn 1989.
  19. REHM, Albert, Milet I,7: Der Südmarkt und die benachbarten Bauanlagen, Berlin 1924.
  20. REHM, Albert, Didyma II. Die Inschriften, Berlin 1958.
  21. REYNOLDS, Joyce, Aphrodisias and Rome. Journal of Roman Studies, Monograph, 1, London 1982.
  22. ROBERT, Jeanne – Louis Robert, La Carie: histoire et géographie historique avec le recueil des inscriptions antiques II, Paris 1954.
  23. SHEPPARD, Anthony R.R., “R.E.C.A.M. Notes and Studies No. 7: Inscriptions from Ușak, Denizli and Hisar Köy”, Anatolian Studies 31, 1981, 19-27.
  24. SHERK, Robe