Journals / History Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

HISTORY OF THE TURKISH-BELARUSIAN RELATIONSAND THE RUSSIAN FACTOR

Türkiye- Belarus İlişkileri Tarihi ve Rusya Faktörü

Pages
805–820
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Their short history ofbilateral relations, official visits and cultural contactsare examined too.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey and Belarus have no common border, nocommon history, culture, or ideology; theirunderstanding of state structure, economy and securitydiffers a lot.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it does not mean that therelations between these two countries are notimportant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Their short history ofbilateral relations, official visits and cultural contactsare examined too.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkey and Belarus have no common border, nocommon history, culture, or ideology; theirunderstanding of state structure, economy and securitydiffers a lot. However, it does not mean that therelations between these two countries are notimportant. Actually, they have enormous potential interms of trade, as a result of their geographicallocations. In this essay, we will examine the spheresof cooperation for Turkey and Belarus, the process ofevaluation of the relations of these countries, whichhave achieved to develop their own partnership,regardless of absence of deep ties by cultural andhistorical means. The two countries are compared witheach other in different aspects. Their short history ofbilateral relations, official visits and cultural contactsare examined too.

Özet

Türkiye ve Belarus’un ortak bir sınırı, ortak tarihi, kültürüveya ideolojisi bulunmamaktadır; ayrıca iki ülkenin devletyapıları, ekonomi ve güvenlik anlayışları birbirinden çokfarklıdır. Ancak bu durum, iki ülke arasındaki ilişkilerinönemli olmadığı anlamına gelmemektedir. Aslında Türkiyeve Belarus coğrafi konumlarının bir sonucu olarak ticaretaçısından muazzam bir potansiyele sahiplerdir. Bu yazıda ikitaraflı işbirliği alanları, birbiriyle kültürel ve tarihsel açıdanderin bağlara sahip olmamalarına rağmen kendine hasortaklıklarını geliştirmeyi başaran bu ülkelerin ikili ilişkileriincelenmiştir. İki ülke arasında farklı alanlardakarşılaştırılma yoluna gidilmiştir. Ayrıca, ikili ilişkilerin kısageçmişi, karşılıklı resmi ziyaretler ve kültürel temaslar daincelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, O. D. (2022). HISTORY OF THE TURKISH-BELARUSIAN RELATIONSAND THE RUSSIAN FACTOR. History Studies, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 805–820. https://ajindex.com/articles/536584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. BRAUDEL, Fernand (1985), Civilization and Capitalism, 15th – 18th Century, The Structures of Everyday Life (Volume I), translated by Siân Reynolds, Harper & Row Publishers: New York. Bielaruś – Turcyja: [chronika padziej] (2006) // Viesn. M-va zamiež. spraŭ Resp. Bielaruś. – № 2. – Šifr NBB: ZOK7441 (Belarus - Turkey: [chronicle of events] // Spring. MFA of the Rep. Belarus. (2006) - № 2. -NBB code: ZOK7441). KUPCHINA, Ye. N. Perspektivy belorussko-turetskogo sotrudnichestva na sovremennom etape (2013) / Ye. N. Kupchina // Problemy upr. –№ 2. – Shifr NBB: ZOK9455 (Kupchina, E. N. Prospects of the Belarusian-Turkish cooperation at the present stage (2006) / E. N. Kupchina // Problems of exercise. - No. 2. -NBB code: ZOK9455). TIKHOMIROV, A. V. Politicheskiye aspekty belorussko-turetskogo vzaimodeystviya v 2010 g. (2011) Belarus' – Turtsiya: puti sotrudnichestva: materialy vtoroy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (25 fevr. 2011 g., g. Minsk) / Fak. mezhdunar. otnosheniy Belorus. gos. un-ta [i dr.]. – Minsk. – Shifr NBB: 1N//310782(039) (TIKHOMIROV, A. Political aspects of the Belarusian-Turkish interaction in 2010 (2011) / A. V. Tikhomirov // Belarus - Turkey: ways of cooperation: materials of the second international. scientificpractical conf. (February 25, 2011, Minsk) / Faculty of international relations of Belarus [and others]. – Minsk, NBB code: 1Н // 310782 (039)). KULEVSKAYA S. V usloviyakh krizisa: Belarus' – Turtsiya, torgovo-ekonomicheskoye sotrudnichestvo (2009) / podgot. // Germes. – № 2. –Shifr NBB: ZOK6513 (In crisis conditions: Belarus - Turkey, trade and economic cooperation (2009) / prep. S. Kulevskaya // Hermes. № 2. –NBB code: ZОК6513). GORDZYALKOVSKIY, A. Nuzhen bereg turetskiy: krupneyshiye turets. investory v Belarusi (2013)/ A. GORDZYALKOVSKIY // Biznes-revyu. – № 3. –Shifr NBB: ZOK12052 (GORDZYALKOVSKY, A. We need a Turkish coast: the largest Turkish. investors in Belarus (2013) / A. GORDZYALKOVSKY // Business review. - 2013. - No. 3. - NBB code: ZОК12052).
  2. ROZALIYEV YU. N. (1980) Ekonomicheskaya istoriya Turetskoy Respubliki. (1980) Otvetstvennyy redaktor A. Iskanderov M.: Nauka. (ROZALIEV Yu. N. Economic history of the Turkish Republic. Managing editor A. Iskanderov, Moscow). YAĞMUR, D. Turetsko-belorusskiye ekonomicheskiye otnosheniya (2013) // Problemy upr. – № 2. YAGMUR, D. Turkish-Belarusian economic relations (2013) // Problems of exercise. - No. 2). ELDEM, Z. Razvitiye vneshney politiki Turtsii v KHKH – nachale KHKHI v. (2009