SavedAdd your journal

Journals / History Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Local Government and Institutional Arrangements in Asia Minor in the Roman Imperial Era

ROMA İMPARATORLUK ÇAĞI’NDA KÜÇÜK ASYA’DA YERELYÖNETİM VE KURUMSAL DÜZENLEMELER

Serpil AYTÜRE
Pages
535–544
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, the effects of localnobility in the local government order in theRoman Imperial Age were examined, and theinstitutional transformation process in theadministrative structure of the poleis wasevaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many developments in the socio-politicalstructure of Greek poleis in Asia Minor duringthe Imperial Age were shaped within theframework of the regulations between local anduniversal practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These developments can befollowed in the structural change of the boule with the boards and offices such as dekaproteia,logistai and eirenarchia which were introducedto the management culture of the settlementswith the Roman rule.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, the effects of localnobility in the local government order in theRoman Imperial Age were examined, and theinstitutional transformation process in theadministrative structure of the poleis wasevaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Many developments in the socio-politicalstructure of Greek poleis in Asia Minor duringthe Imperial Age were shaped within theframework of the regulations between local anduniversal practices. These developments can befollowed in the structural change of the boule with the boards and offices such as dekaproteia,logistai and eirenarchia which were introducedto the management culture of the settlementswith the Roman rule. In this social and politicaltransformation, the local aristocracy, which wasactivated by Rome, has an important place.Members of this noble class were supported bythe Roman administration in having a say inpolitical institutions and assuming high-levelpublic positions. In the study, the effects of localnobility in the local government order in theRoman Imperial Age were examined, and theinstitutional transformation process in theadministrative structure of the poleis wasevaluated.

Özet

İmparatorluk Çağı’nda Küçük Asya’da Grekpolis’lerinin sosyo-politik yapısında yaşanan çoğugelişme, yerel ve evrensel uygulamalar arasındakidüzenlemeler çerçevesinde şekillenmiştir. Bugelişmeler, Roma egemenliği ile birlikte yerleşimlerinyönetim kültürüne tanıtılan dekaprotos’luk,logistes’lik ve eirenarkhos’luk gibi kurul vememuriyetler ile boule’nin yapısal değişimindeizlenebilmektedir. Bu sosyal ve politik dönüşümdeRoma’nın yönetimde etkin kıldığı yerel soylu sınıfönemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu soylu sınıfın üyeleri,politik kurumlarda söz sahibi olmak ve üst düzeykamu görevlerini üstlenmek için Roma yönetimitarafından desteklenmiştir. Çalışmada Romaİmparatorluk Çağı’nda yerel soyluların kentyönetimindeki etkileri incelenmiş, polis’lerin idariyapısında gerçekleşen kurumsal dönüşüm sürecideğerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTÜRE, S. (2022). Local Government and Institutional Arrangements in Asia Minor in the Roman Imperial Era. History Studies, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 535–544. https://ajindex.com/articles/536549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ARISTOTELES, Atinalıların Devleti, Çev: Ari Çokona, İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2013.
  2. CODEX THEODOSİANUS, The Theodosian Code, (Ed: J.Harries-I.Wood), Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1993.
  3. DIGESTA, Corpus Iuris Civilis I, Institutiones, (Ed:P.KRUGER), Digesta, (Ed: Th. MOMMSEN), Dublin, Zürih 1973.
  4. EUSEBIUS, Historia Ecclesiastica, Çev: Kirsopp Lake, I/15, The Loeb Classical Library, 1926.
  5. PHILOSTRATOS, Philostratus and Eunapius, The lives of the Sophistes, Çev: W. C. Wright, London, New York 1922.
  6. PLINIUS, Letters, Çev: B.Radice, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1969.
  7. I Ephesos KNIBBE, D., Forschungen in Ephesos, Vienna 1981. IG Inscriptiones Graecae. I. Iasos BLUMEL,W., Die Inschriften von Iasos II, Bonn 1985.
  8. IK Stratonikeia ŞAHİN, Ç., Die Inschriften von Stratonikeia. Panamara, Bonn 1981. I. Smyrna II PETZL,G., Die Inschriften von Smyrna II/1. Bonn 1987. OGIS Orientis Graeci Inscriptiones Selectae. SEG Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum TAM Tituli Asiae Minoris AKDOĞU- ARCA, Ebru, N. Lykia ve Pamphylia Kentlerinde Euergesia, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Antalya 2001.
  9. ASCOUGH, Richard S., Religious Rivalries and the Struggle for Success in Sardis and Smyrna, Canada 2005.
  10. BEHR, Charles A., The Complete Works of P. Aelius Aristides, vol.2: Orations XVII-LIII. Brill 1981.
  11. BOATWRIGHT, Mary T., Hadrian and the Cities of the Roman Empire. Princeton 2000. BRÉLAZ, Cédric, La securité publique en Asie mineure sous le Principat (Ier - IIIème s. ap. J.-C.): institutions municipales et institutions impériales dans l'Orient romain, Schwabe, 2005.
  12. BRUUN, Christer, “Local Elites in the Greek East”, The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy, (Ed: Christer Bruun, Jonathan. C. Edmondson, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015, s. 250-274.
  13. BURTON, G.P., “The Imperial State and Its Impact on the Role and Status of Local Magistrates and Councillors in the Provinces of the Empire”, Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire, (Ed: Lukas de Blois), Amsterdam 2001, s. 208-214.
  14. BURTON, G.P., “The Roman Imperial State, Provincial Governors and the Public Finances of Provincial Cities”, 27 BC – AD 235, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 2004, s. 311- 342. CADOUX, Cecil John, Ancient Smyrna A History of The City from the Earliest Times to 324 A.D. Oxford 1938.
  15. CHURCHIN, Leonard A., “The End of Local Magistrates in the Roman Empire”, Gerión, 32, 2014, s. 271- 287. DİNGİL, Filiz, Principatus D