Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

The value of inflammatorymarkers and biochemicalparameters in assessment of severityof acute pancreatitis

Akut pankreatit ciddiyetini belirlemede inflamatuar markerlar ile biyokimyasal parametrelerin değeri

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The leucocyte count and gluco-se level were statistically higher in severe pancreatitis group (p value=0.006 and p value=0.009respectively)CONCLUSION : This study demonstrated thatleucocyte cound and glucose level can be predictive laboratory tests for severe pancreatitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTİVE : Acute pancreatitis is still an important pathology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we analyzed retros-pectively the predictive value of inflammatorymarkers and biochemical parameters for developement ofsevere pancreatitis.METHODS: Fifty-two patients with diagnosis ofacute pancreatitis were retrospectively studied inbetween May 2011 to October 2011.The patients were separated in two groups according toCTseverity indexs as mild and severe pancreatitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The leucocyte count and gluco-se level were statistically higher in severe pancreatitis group (p value=0.006 and p value=0.009respectively)CONCLUSION : This study demonstrated thatleucocyte cound and glucose level can be predictive laboratory tests for severe pancreatitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTİVE : Acute pancreatitis is still an important pathology. In this study, we analyzed retros-pectively the predictive value of inflammatorymarkers and biochemical parameters for developement ofsevere pancreatitis.METHODS: Fifty-two patients with diagnosis ofacute pancreatitis were retrospectively studied inbetween May 2011 to October 2011.The patients were separated in two groups according toCTseverity indexs as mild and severe pancreatitis. Data about patient s age,gender, laboratoryand imaging results ,duration of hospitalization,morbidity and mortality rates were collected. Thestatistical analysis was performed with SPSS 17program.RESULTS: There were 39 women and 13 menpatients. The median age was 56.8±17.2 (Ran-ge:19-97). There were 30 mild and 22 severepancreatitis. Although CRPvalue washigher in severe pancreatitis it was not statistically meaningful. The leucocyte count and gluco-se level were statistically higher in severe pancreatitis group (p value=0.006 and p value=0.009respectively)CONCLUSION : This study demonstrated thatleucocyte cound and glucose level can be predictive laboratory tests for severe pancreatitis.

Özet

AMAÇ : Akut pankreatit hala önemli bir patolojidir. Bu çalışmamızda akut pankreatit nedeni iletedavi ettiğimiz hastalarda ciddi pankreatit gelişimine gösterebilecek inflamatuar markırlar ve bio-kimyasal parametreler retrospektif olarak ince-lendi.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM : Mayıs 2011 ile Ekim2011 tarihleri arsında akut pankreatit tanısı alan52 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. HastalarBTciddiyet indeksine göre hafif ve ciddi pankreatit olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı . Hastaların yaş,cinsiyet,Laboratuar ve görüntüleme yöntemlerinin sonuçları, ,hastanede yatış süreleri, morbidite ve mortalite sonuçları toplandı.Sonuçlar SPSS 17 istatstik programında değerlendirildi.BULGULAR: Retrospektif olarak incelenen52hastanın 39u kadın ve 13ü erkekti.Hastaların yaş ortalaması 56.8±17.2 (19-97 arası) idi. Hastaların 30u hafif (BTindeksi A-B-C), 22si ciddi (BTindeksi D-E) olarak sınıflandırıldı. CRPdeğerleri ciddi pankreatit grubunda daha yüksek olmasına rağmen istatistiksel olarakanlamlı değildi. Ağır pankreatit grubunda Lökositsayısı ve serum glukoz değerleri hafif pankreatitgrubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek olarak bulundu. ( p= 0.006 ve p=0.009).SONUÇLAR: Bu çalışma ciddi pankreatitli hastagrubunda lökosit sayımı ve kan şeker düzeylerinin hafif pankreatitli hastalara göre anlamlı olarak yüksek seyrettiğini göstermiştir.Bu laboratuar testleri pankreatitli hastaların prognozunu balirlemede yardımcı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANA, B., KAYA, B., YILDIZ, M. K., TAŞKIN, A. K., ERİŞ, C. (2022). The value of inflammatorymarkers and biochemicalparameters in assessment of severityof acute pancreatitis. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/535411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(10):2379-400. 2-Kusske AM, Rongione AJ, Reber HA. Cytokines and acute pancreatitis.Gastroenterology 1996;110(2):639-642. 3- Larvin M. Circulating mediators in acute pancreatitis as pre- dictors of severity. Scand J Gastroenterol.1996;219:16-19. 4- Windsor AC, Kanwar S, Li AG, et al. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1998;42(3):431-435. 5- Woo SM, Noh MH, Kim BG et al. Comparison of serum pro- calcitonin with Ranson, APACHE-II, Glasgow and Balthazar CT severity index scores in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2011;58(1):31-7. 6- Kaya E, Dervisoglu A, Polat C. Evaluation of diagnostic findings and scoringsystems in outcome prediction in acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007 14;13(22):3090-4. 7- Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Yet al; JPN. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: severity assessment of acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(1):33-41. 8-Lempinen M, Puolakkainen P, Kemppainen E. Clinical value of severity markers in acute pancreatitis. Scand J Surg. 2005;94(2): 118-123 9-Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neill J, Gilmour WH, Carter DC. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1984; 25(12):1340-6. 10-Robert JH, Frossard JL, Mermillod B, et al. Early prediction of acute pancreatitis: prospective study comparing computed tomography scans, Ranson, Glascow, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, and various serum markers. World J Surg. 2002; 26(5):612-9. 11- Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139(1):69–81. 12-Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS. Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis:com- parative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE II- I score. Arch Surg 2002; 137(6):730-6. 13 - Taylor SL, Morgan DL, Denson KD, Lane MM, Pennington LR. Acomparison of the Ranson, Glasgow, and APACHE II scoring systems to a multiple organ system score in predicting patient outcome in pancre- atitis. Am J Surg. 2005; 189(2):219-22. 14 - Yeung YP, Lam BY, Yip AW. APACHE system is better than Ranson system in the prediction of severity of acute pancrea