Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

A Rare Cause of Colon Perforation; Intrauterin Device

Nadir Görülen Bir Kolon Perforasyon Nedeni; Rahim İçi Araç

Pages
72–74
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It enables repair of organ perforations at the samesession and provides less tissue damage by minimal incision,less postoperative pain and decreased risk of intra-abdominaladhesion and therefore, facilitating the patient’s comfort anddecreasing duration of hospitalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intrauterin device (IUD) is one of the most common usedcontraseptive methods in the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This reportrepresents a case with an acute abdominal condition due toa migrating IUD which perforated the uterus and migratedto and perforated the sigmoid colon.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It enables repair of organ perforations at the samesession and provides less tissue damage by minimal incision,less postoperative pain and decreased risk of intra-abdominaladhesion and therefore, facilitating the patient’s comfort anddecreasing duration of hospitalization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Intrauterin device (IUD) is one of the most common usedcontraseptive methods in the world. Migration of IUD tosigmoid colon is a rare and serious complication. This reportrepresents a case with an acute abdominal condition due toa migrating IUD which perforated the uterus and migratedto and perforated the sigmoid colon. IUD was removed fromthe abdomen laparoscopically and at the same session,laparoscopic repair of the sigmoid colon and uterus wereperformed. Laparoscopy is a reliable method for patients withlost intra-abdominal IUD which migrates by perforating theuterus. It enables repair of organ perforations at the samesession and provides less tissue damage by minimal incision,less postoperative pain and decreased risk of intra-abdominaladhesion and therefore, facilitating the patient’s comfort anddecreasing duration of hospitalization.

Özet

Rahim içi araç (RİA) dünyada en sık kullanılan kontraseptif yöntemlerinden biridir. RİA’nın sigmoid kolona migrasyonu nadir görülen ciddi bir komplikasyondur. Bu çalışmamızda uterusu perfore ederek sigmoid kolona migrasyon yapan ve kolon perforasyonu oluşturarak akut batın kliniği veren hastamızda, RİA’nın laparoskopik olarak batın dışına çıkarılmasını ve aynı seansta laparoskopik sigmoid kolon ve uterus onarımının yapılmasını sunduk. Uterus perforasyonu oluşturarak migrasyon yapmış kayıp batın içi RİA olgularında laparoskopi güvenilir bir yöntem olup, aynı seansta organ perforasyonlarının tamirine de olanak sağlamakta ve minimal insizyonla daha az doku travması, daha az postoperatif ağrı ve azalmış intra-abdominal adezyon riski sağlayarak hasta konforu ve yatış süresinin kısalmasına olanak tanımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEBİ, F., BİLGE, H., KARAGÜLLE, O. O., SANA, B., ZİLAN, A., YAVUZ, E. (2022). A Rare Cause of Colon Perforation; Intrauterin Device. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 72–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/551943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ertopçu K. Intrauterin device. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst-Special Topics 2012; 5: 37-42
  2. Grimaldi L, DeGeorgio F, Andreotta P, D Alessio MC, Piscicelli C, Pascali VL. Mediolegal aspect of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375 R. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2005; 26: 365-6
  3. Arslan A, Kanat-Pektas M, Yesilyurt H, Bilge U. Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279: 395-7
  4. Öztürk Z, Usta T, Acet M, Ateş U, Sidal B. Sigmoid kolonda Rahim içi aracın incidental tespiti. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi 2010; 25: 91-2
  5. Akpınar F, Özgür EN, Yılmaz S, Ustaoğlu O. Sigmoid colon migration of an intrauterine device. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2014: 207659
  6. Hubacher D, Chen PL, Park S. Side effects from the copper intrauterine device: do they decrease over time? Contraception 2009; 79: 356-62
  7. Medina TM, Hill DA, Delesus S, Hoover F. IUD removal with colonoscopy: a case report. J Reprod Med 2005; 50: 547-9
  8. Heartwell SP, Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 31-6
  9. Chen CP, Hsu TC, Wang W. Ileal penetration by a MultiloadCu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature. Contraception 1998; 58: 295-304
  10. Bilge Z, Öztaş E, Özderin Özin Y, Öztaş E, Dişibeyaz S. An foreign body inside rectum; intrauterine device. Endoscopy Gastrointestinal 2015; 23: 62-3
  11. Sentilhes L, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Poilblanc M. Incidental finding of an intrauterine device in the sigmoid colon. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008; 13: 212-4
  12. Tinelli A, Tinelli R, Malvasi A, Cavallotti C, Tinelli FG. The intrauterine device in modern contraception: Still an actuality? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2006; 11: 197-201
  13. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforation with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998; 57: 251-5
  14. Altınel Ö, Demirbaş S. Laparoskopik Kolorektal Cerrahi review. Türkiye Klinikleri J Gen Surg-Special Topics 2011; 4: 51-9
  15. Alanbay İ, Çoksüer H, Güler AE, Ercan M, Keskin U, Karaşahin E, et al. İntraabdominal kayıp rahim içi aracın laparoskopik olarak çıkarılması; Olgu sunumu ve literatür incelemesi. Cumhuriyet Tıp Derg 2011; 33: 365-s9.