Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Apendiküler kitlelerde erken apendektomi

Immediate appendectomy for appendiceal mass

Pages
71–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION Immediate appendectomy in appendicular mass is a safe and effective alternative to conservative management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of immediate appendectomy in patients presenting with appendicular mass.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS Forty-seven patients with appendicular mass were operated within 24 hours after admission to Vakif Gureba Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Department, from January 2004 to April 2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION Immediate appendectomy in appendicular mass is a safe and effective alternative to conservative management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of immediate appendectomy in patients presenting with appendicular mass. METHODS Forty-seven patients with appendicular mass were operated within 24 hours after admission to Vakif Gureba Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Department, from January 2004 to April 2010. The appendiceal mass was diagnosed with physical examination, abdominal ultrasonography, and computed tomography, or during surgical exploration. Age and sex, duration of symptoms, physical examination findings at admission, operation details, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed for each patient. RESULTS There were 25 males (53.2%) and 22 females (46.8%), with a mean age of 37.23±15.60 (range: 14-75) years. The mean time from the onset of the symptoms to operation was 4.06±2.50 (range: 1-15) days. A simple appendectomy was performed in 38 (80.9%) patients. Twenty-nine (61.8%) patients were discharged and followed up without any complication after surgery. Wound infection was detected in 13 (27.7%) patients. CONCLUSION Immediate appendectomy in appendicular mass is a safe and effective alternative to conservative management.

Özet

AMAÇ Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı, apendiküler kitle tespit edilen hastalarda erken apendektominin güvenirliğini ve etkinliğini araştırmaktır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Vakıf Gureba Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Genel Cerrahi Kliniği’ne Ocak 2004 ile Nisan 2010 tarihleri arasında başvuran 47 hasta apendiküler kitle nedeni ile 24 saat içerisinde ameliyat edildi. Apendiküler kitle tanısı fiziksel inceleme, karın ultrasonografisi, bilgisayarlı tomografi ya da ameliyat sırasında konuldu. Yaş ve cinsiyet, semptomların süresi, başvuruda fiziksel inceleme bulguları, ameliyat bulguları, intraoperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar ile hastanede yatış süresi her hasta için analiz edildi. BULGULAR Çalışmaya 25 erkek (%53,2) ve 22 kadın (%46,8) hasta alındı. Ortalama yaş 37,23±15,60 (dağılım 14-75 yaş) idi. Semptomların başlaması ile ameliyat arasında geçen ortalama zaman 4,06±2,50 gündü (dağılım 1-15 gün). Apendektomi 38 hastada (%80,9) uygulandı. Yirmi dokuz hasta (%61,8) cerrahi sonrası herhangi bir komplikasyon olmaksızın taburcu edildi. Yara yeri enfeksiyonu 13 hastada (%27,7) saptandı. SONUÇ Erken apendektomi, apandiküler kitlelerde konservatif tedaviye alternatif güvenli ve etkili bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, B., SANA, B., ERİŞ, C., KUTANİŞ, R. (2012). Apendiküler kitlelerde erken apendektomi. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 71–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/324197

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Shipsey MR, O’Donnell B. Conservative management of appendix mass in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1985;67:23- 4
  2. Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 1993;80:18-20
  3. Ochsner AJ. The cause of diffuse peritonitis complicating appendicitis and its prevention. JAMA 1901;26:1747-54
  4. Bagi P, Dueholm S. Nonoperative management of the ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass. Surgery 1987;101:602- 5
  5. Kim JK, Ryoo S, Oh HK, Kim JS, Shin R, Choe EK, et al. Management of appendicitis presenting with abscess or mass. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2010;26:413-9
  6. Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA. Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 2011;35:1221-8
  7. Gibeily GJ, Ross MN, Manning DB, Wherry DC, Kao TC. Late-presenting appendicitis: a laparoscopic approach to a complicated problem. Surg Endosc 2003;17:725-9
  8. Garba ES, Ahmed A. Management of appendiceal mass. Ann Afr Med 2008;7:200-4
  9. Befeler D. Recurrent appendicitis. Incidence and prophylaxis. Arch Surg 1964;89:666-8
  10. Vargas HI, Averbook A, Stamos MJ. Appendiceal mass: conservative therapy followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Am Surg 1994;60:753-8
  11. Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F, Klein S, Stamos MJ. Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 1998;64:970-5
  12. Meshikhes AW. Management of appendiceal mass: controversial issues revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:767-75
  13. Samuel M, Hosie G, Holmes K. Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:882-6
  14. Goh BK, Chui CH, Yap TL, Low Y, Lama TK, Alkouder G, et al. Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1134-7
  15. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Vargas H, Arnell T, et al. Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass. Am J Surg 2000;179:177-81
  16. Jordan JS, Kovalcik PJ, Schwab CW. Appendicitis with a palpable mass. Ann Surg 1981;193:227-9
  17. Kumar S, Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004;23:165-7
  18. Cunnigaiper ND, Raj P, Ganeshram P, Venkatesan V. Does Ochsner-Sherren regimen still hold true in the management of appendicular mass? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2010;16:43-6
  19. Tingste