SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 30

A Study on Seventy and Tenth Grade Students Self-Estimated Intelligence Dimensions

Yedinci ve Onuncu Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Kendini Değerlendirmesiyle Bulunan Çoklu Zeka Boyutları Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Ali ERYILMAZ
Emel UYSAL
Pages
230–239
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that the most dominant intelligence of seventh, tenth and all students was the interpersonal intelligence, and the grade level of students had a significant effect on their remaining self-estimated inteJligence dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This studyaimed to explore the self-estimated intelligence dimensions of seventh and tenth grade students, and the relationship between these dimensions and science/physics achievement, grade level, age, gender socio economic status and branch in school (science-math,literature-math, social sciences-literature).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study a Multiple Intelligence Inventory was used as a measuring instrument.The study was conducted in randomly selected 26 elementary and 7 high schools throughout Çankaya, Keçiören and Yenimahalle districts of Ankara with a total of 3721 seventh and tenth grade students in Fall 2003-2004 semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that the most dominant intelligence of seventh, tenth and all students was the interpersonal intelligence, and the grade level of students had a significant effect on their remaining self-estimated inteJligence dimensions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This studyaimed to explore the self-estimated intelligence dimensions of seventh and tenth grade students, and the relationship between these dimensions and science/physics achievement, grade level, age, gender socio economic status and branch in school (science-math,literature-math, social sciences-literature). In this study a Multiple Intelligence Inventory was used as a measuring instrument.The study was conducted in randomly selected 26 elementary and 7 high schools throughout Çankaya, Keçiören and Yenimahalle districts of Ankara with a total of 3721 seventh and tenth grade students in Fall 2003-2004 semester. The data obtained were analyzed by using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and bivariate correlations. Results indicated that the most dominant intelligence of seventh, tenth and all students was the interpersonal intelligence, and the grade level of students had a significant effect on their remaining self-estimated inteJligence dimensions. Bivariate correlations revealed low positive correlations between science achievement and interpersonal intelligence of seventh graders.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı; yedinci ve onuncu sınıf öğrencilerinin çoklu zeka boyutlarını öz-değerlendirme yoluyla belirlemek ve bu boyutlarla, fen/fizik başarısı, sınıf seviyesi, yaş, cinsiyet, sosyo ekonomik düzey ve okuldaki branşın (fen-matematik, Türkçe-matematik, Türkçe-sosyal) ilişkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmada ölçüm aracı olarak Çoklu Zeka Envanteri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma 2003-2004 sonbahar döneminde, Çankaya, Keçiören ve Yenimahalle ilçelerinden rastgele seçilen 26 ilköğretim okulu ve 7liseden toplam 3721 yedinci ve onuncu sınıf öğrencisi ile yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, çok yönlü varyans (MANOVA) istatistiksel tekniği ve basit ilişki analizi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. İstatistiksel sonuçlar, yedinci sınıf, onuncu sınıf ve tüm öğrencilerin en baskın zeka alanının sosyal-bireylerarası zeka oldu~unu göstermiştir. ÖArencilerin güçlü oldukları diğer zeka alanları sınıf seviyelerine göre de~işkenlik göstermektedir. Basit ilişki analizleri, öğrencilerin fen başarılarının sosyal-bireylerarası zeka alanlarıyla düşük pozitif bir ilişki içerisinde olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERYILMAZ, A., UYSAL, E. (2022). A Study on Seventy and Tenth Grade Students Self-Estimated Intelligence Dimensions. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 30, 230–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/532451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Brualdi. A. (1998). Multiple intelligences: Gardner's theory. Teacher Librarian, 26).,11-21.
  2. Campbell, L. & Campbell, B. (1999). Multiple Intelligences and StudentAchievement: Success Stories From Six Schools. Alexandria, VA; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Chan, D. W. (2001). Assessing giftedness of Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: A multiple intelligences perspective. High Ability Studies 12,2,215-234.
  3. Franzen. R. J. (2000). Self perceptions of multiple intelligences among studentsfrom a middle school in the Midwest. Dissertation Abstracts International. 61(01), 82. (University Microfilms NoAAT9958715). Retrieved January 03, 2003, from Digital Dissertations database. Furnham, A., Fong, G., & Martin, F. (1999). Sex and cross-cultural differences in the estimated multifaceted intelligence quotient score for self, parents, and siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 26,1025-1034.
  4. Goodnough, K. (2001). Multiple intelligences theory: A framework for personalizing science curricula, School Science and Mathematics, 101,4, 180-194.
  5. Greenhawk, J. (1997). Multiple intelligences meet standards.Educational Leadership, 55,1,62-64.
  6. Gürçay, D. ve Eryılmaz, A. (2002, September). Lise i. sınıf ö~ncilerinin çoklu zeka alanlarınıntespiti ve fizik e~itimi üzerine etkileri. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eltitimi Kongresi, Ankara.
  7. Halpern, D. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence. American Psychologist, 52, 1091-1102.
  8. Harms, G. D. (1998). Self-perceptions of multiple intelligences among selected third-, seventh-, and eleventh-grade students in South Dakota. Dissertation Abstracts International. 59(8),2850. (University Microfilms No.AAT9902685). Retrieved January 03, 2003, from Digital Dissertations database. Multiple Intelligences Inventory. (n.d.). Retrieved April 7,2003, from http://www.angelfire.com/va/gkerns/revisedteele.html
  9. Oddleifson, E. (1994). What do we want our schools do? Phi Delta Kappan, 75(6), 446-453.
  10. Oral, B. (2001). Branşlarına göre üniversite öğrencilerininzeka alanlarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 26,122,19-31.
  11. Özdemir, P., Korkmaz, H., & Kaptan, F. (2002, September). ılköğretim okullarında çoklu zeka kuramı temelli fen eğitimi yoluyla üst düzey düşünme becerilerini geliştirme üzerine bir inceleme.V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara,
  12. Türkiye. Patterson, C. (2002). Linking research to educational practice II symposium paper: Understanding the multiple intelligence approach to