Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of disc deformities in temporomandibular disc displacements

Temporomandibular eklem diskindeki deformasyonların karşılaştırılması

Pages
13–18
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference between non disc displacement and disc displacement groups was statistically signi¬ficant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Retrodiscal tissue undergoes remodelling and a decrease in vascularity occurs when the temporomandibular joint disc is displaced.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Two hundred eighteen TMJs of 109 patients ( 92 female and 17 male) were studied using magnetic resonance imaging examination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference between non disc displacement and disc displacement groups was statistically signi¬ficant (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Retrodiscal tissue undergoes remodelling and a decrease in vascularity occurs when the temporomandibular joint disc is displaced. During this process deformities may be seen at the disc which is attached to the retrodiscal tissues. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to com¬pare the disc deformities among the disc displacement types. Patients and Methods: Two hundred eighteen TMJs of 109 patients ( 92 female and 17 male) were studied using magnetic resonance imaging examination. Results: Of 218 TMJ discs, 84 had no disc displacement, and only %8,3 of these discs had deformities. Of 134 TMJ discs which had disc displacement, %69,4 had disc deformities. The difference between non disc displacement and disc displacement groups was statistically signi¬ficant (p

Özet

Giriş.Temporomandibular eklem diskinin yer değiştirdiği redüksiyonlu ve redüksiyonsuz disk deplasmanı olgularında, retrodiskal doku kondil ve temporomandibular kemik arasında kalır, vaskülarizasyonu azalır ve yeniden yapılanma süreci başlar. Bu süreç içerisinde retrodiskal dokuların bağlı olduğu diskte de deformasyonlar gözlenir. Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı redüksiyonlu ve redüksiyonsuz disk deplasmanı olgularında disk deformas-yonlarının sınıflandırılması ve karşılaştırılmasıdır. Birey ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 109 hastaya ait 218 eklemin manyetik rezonans görüntüleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular. Disk deplasmanı olmayan 84 eklemin 7'sinde (%8,3) disk deformasyonu görülürken, redük¬siyonlu veya redüksiyonsuz disk deplasmanı olan 134 eklemin 93'ünde (%69,4) disk deformasyonu gözlenmiş ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MUHTAROĞULLARI, M., ERTAN, A. A., DEMİRALP, B. (2022). Comparison of disc deformities in temporomandibular disc displacements. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/528533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Schwartz HC, Kendrick RW: Internal derangaments of the temporomandibular joint. Description of clinical syndromes. Oral Surg. 1984;58(l):24-9.
  2. Heffez LB, Jordan SL: Superficial vascularity of temporomandibular joint retrodiscal tissue: An element of the internal derangements process. J Craniomandib Pract.l992;10(3):180-91.
  3. Hasso AN, Christiansen EL, Alder ME: The temporomandibular joint.Radiol Clin North Am.l989;27(2):301-14.
  4. Ertan AA, Muhtaroğulları M, Demiralp B. Tempromandibular eklem diskinin redüksiyonsuz öne yer değiştirdiği vakalarda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ve transkranial radyografinin karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2005;29(l):56-60.
  5. Nance EP, Powers TA: Imaging of the temporomandibularjoint.Radiol Clin North Am.l990;28(5):1019-31.
  6. Nebbe B, Major PW, Prasad NGN, et al: Quantitative assessmentoftemporomandibularjointdisc status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.l998;85(5):598-607. 7. Tallents, R.H., Katzberg, R.W., Murphy, W., Proskin, H.: Magnetic resonance imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(5): 529-533. 8. Katzberg, Rcw., Schenck, J., Roberts, D., et al.: Magnetic resonance Imaging of the temporomandibular joint meniscus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral pathol. 1985;59(4):332-335. 9. Katzberg, R.W., Bessette, R.W., Tallents, R.H., et al.: Normal and Abnormal Temporomandibular Joint: MR Imaging with surface Coil. Radiology. 1986;158(1):183-189. 10. Murakami S, Takahashi A, Nishiyama H, et al: Magnetic resonance evaluation of the TMJ disc position and configuration. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22(4):205-7. 11. Heffez L, Jordan S: A classification of temporomandibular joint disc morphology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.l989;67(l):ll-9. 12. Taşkaya-Yılmaz N, Öğütçen-Toller M. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of temporomandibular joint disc deformities in relation to type of disc displacement. J Oral MaxillofacSurg.2001;59(8):860-865. 13. Larheim TA: Current trends in TMJ imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1995;80(5):555-76.