SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Tek diş eksikliğinde Swissplus implant sistemi kullanımının klinik ve radyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi

Clinical and radiographical analysis of single-tooth replacement with Swissplus implant system

Mehmet MUHTAROĞULLARI
A. Atila ERTAN
Sezgin Sema HAKKI
Burak DEMİRALP
Pages
57–62
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With a %98.4 survival rate of Swissplus implant system in single-tooth replacement were satisfactory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a report of experience and results with Swissplus implant system used for single-tooth treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 62 single-tooth implants (30 maxilla, 32 mandible) were placed in 42 patients (22 females, 20 males; aged between 20 to 69 with a mean age of 38.6 ± 13.2 years) over a period of 30 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With a %98.4 survival rate of Swissplus implant system in single-tooth replacement were satisfactory.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a report of experience and results with Swissplus implant system used for single-tooth treatment. Materials and Methods: 62 single-tooth implants (30 maxilla, 32 mandible) were placed in 42 patients (22 females, 20 males; aged between 20 to 69 with a mean age of 38.6 ± 13.2 years) over a period of 30 months. All crowns were cemented on standard abutments. The follow-up time varied between 3 to 30 months. Radiographical bone loss, peri-implant soft tissue conditions including gingival index, plaque index and pocket depths have been evaluated Results: One implant (%1.61) was lost before loading. 5 crowns (% 8.1) were recemented due to the loosing. Peri-implant soft tissue conditions were satisfactory. Pocket depths were 2.8 ± 1.4 mm and bone resorption was 0.8 ± 0.4 mm over a period of 30 months. Discussion: Based upon a clinical study of 62 single tooth implants placed over a period of 30 months an implant survival rate of %98.4 was observed. With a %98.4 survival rate of Swissplus implant system in single-tooth replacement were satisfactory.

Özet

Amaç; Bu çalışmanın amacı tek diş eksikliğinde swissplus implant sistemi kullanımına ait sonuçların klinik ve radyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ue Yöntem: Tek diş eksikliği olan 42 hastaya (20-69 yaşları arasında (ortalama yaş 38,8 ± 13,2) 22 kadın, 20 erkek) toplam62 implant 30 aylık bir dönem içinde yerleştirilmiştir. Tüm kronlar standart dayanaklar üzerine semente edilmiştir. Takip süresi 3-30 ay arasında değişmektedir. Radyografik olarak kemik kaybı, gingival indeks, plak indeksi ve cep derinliğinden oluşan peri-implant yumuşak doku kontrolleri yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar: Bir implant yüklemeden önce kaybedilmiştir (%1,61). Beş kron (%8,1) gevşeme nedeniyle tekrar semente edilmiştir. Peri-implant yumuşak doku sağlığı tatmin edici bulunmuştur. 30 ay sonunda ortalama cep derinliği 2.8 ± 1.4 mm ortalama kemik rezorbsiyonu ise 0.8 ± 0.4 mm bulunmuştur. Tartışma: Tek diş eksikliğinin söz konusu olduğu durumlarda 30 ay dönem sonunda yerleştirilen ve takip edilen 62 implantlık bu klinik çalışama sonucunda %98.4'lük implant başarısı elde edilmiştir. Swissplus implant sistemi kullanılarak elde edilen bu %98.4'lük başarıya dayanarak sistemin tek diş eksikliğinin tedavisinde kullanımının uygun olabileceği söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUHTAROĞULLARI, M., ERTAN, A. A., HAKKI, S. S., DEMİRALP, B. (2022). Tek diş eksikliğinde Swissplus implant sistemi kullanımının klinik ve radyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 57–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/528490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Belser UC, Buser D, Hess D, Schmid B, Bernard JP, Lang NP. Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients- a critical appraisal. Periodontology 2000. 1998; 17:132-150
  2. Krennmair G, Schmidinger S, Waldenberger O. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: A retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:78-85
  3. Mericke-Stern R, Grüttler L, Rösch R, Mericske E. Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacement by non-submerged implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001;12: 309-318
  4. Misch CE. Single tooth implants. In: Contemporary implant dentistry 2nd ed. Editor: Misch CE. Mosby Inc. Missouri.1999; 397-428
  5. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(2):162-8
  6. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal conditions. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22:121
  7. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Branemark single tooth implants: a preliminary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(3):274-9
  8. Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative clenaning efficiency of manual and powerbrushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962;65:26
  9. Cheung GS, Dimmer A, Mellor R, Gale M. A clinical evaluation of conventional bridgework. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17(2):131-6
  10. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56(4):416-21
  11. Priest GF. Failure rates of restorations for single-tooth replacement. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9(1):38-45
  12. Schillinburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3 ed. Chicago, Quintessennce Inc. 1997
  13. Hansson O. Clinical results with resin-bonded prostheses and an adhesive cement. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(2):125-32
  14. Scholander S. A retrospective evaluation of 259 single-tooth replacements by the use of Branemark implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(6):483-91
  15. Andersson B, Odman P, Lindvall AM, Branemark PI. Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5 years: results from a prospective study on CeraOne. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(3):212-8
  16. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.