Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Comparative analysis of PROMETHEE and fuzzy PROMETHEE methods in equipment selection problem

Ekipman seçimi probleminde PROMETHEE ve bulanık PROMETHEE yöntemlerinin karşılaştırmalı analizi

Pages
811–826
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both cases are analyzed comparatively in detail with obtained results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Planing, managing and controling of production systems, which have varient and inconstant featured components like human, machines and materials, have got a complex and hard structure and is a process that requires taking decisions influencing by criteria more than one.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Problems met this type of processes are decision problems involving numerous conflicting criteria, and in such situations employing multi criteria decision making methods providing a analytical point of view, giving mathematical and logical solutions to problems, derives great advantages in solving and subsequent stages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both cases are analyzed comparatively in detail with obtained results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Planing, managing and controling of production systems, which have varient and inconstant featured components like human, machines and materials, have got a complex and hard structure and is a process that requires taking decisions influencing by criteria more than one. Problems met this type of processes are decision problems involving numerous conflicting criteria, and in such situations employing multi criteria decision making methods providing a analytical point of view, giving mathematical and logical solutions to problems, derives great advantages in solving and subsequent stages. Equipment selection is a quite important subject for an effective production system, and is a decision making problem which is exhausting, complex, hard and generally requiring both selecting the most appropriate choice among a wide range of resembling alternatives and taking consideration of numerous criteria. In this study, the welding machine selection problem of a company is analyzed based on a multi criteria decision making problem including prioritization of the linguistically defined criteria. In our application, both partial and full ranking are determined for alternative equipments by employing crisp numbers as well as fuzzy numbers to solve the problem. Both cases are analyzed comparatively in detail with obtained results.

Özet

İnsan, makine, malzeme gibi çok çeşitlilikte ve değişken özellikler gösteren bileşenlere sahip olan üretim sistemlerinin planlanması, yönetilmesi ve kontrol edilmesi genellikle zor ve karmaşık bir yapıya sahip olup, birden fazla etken tarafından etkilenen kararlar alınmasını gerektiren bir süreçtir. Bu tip süreçlerde karşılaşılan problemler çok sayıda çelişen kriter içeren kompleks karar problemleri niteliğindedir. Bu gibi durumlarda analitik bir bakış açısı sağlayan, probleme matematiksel ve mantıklı çözümler getirebilen çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin uygulanması çözüm ve daha sonraki aşamalarda büyük yararlar sağlamaktadır. Ekipman seçimi, etkin bir üretim sistemi için oldukça önemli bir konudur. Genellikle birbirine çok benzeyen pek çok tipteki ekipmanın arasından en doğru seçimi yapmayı çok sayıda kriterin göz önüne alınması ile birlikte gerektiren, yorucu, karmaşık, zor bir karar verme problemidir. Bu çalışmada, bir işletmenin kaynak makinesi seçimi problemi, dilsel ifadelerle tanımlanan kriterlerin önceliklendirilmesini içeren çok kriterli bir karar verme problemi temelinde incelenmiştir. Yapılan uygulamada problem hem bulanık hem de kesin sayıların kullanılmasıyla çözülerek alternatif ekipmanlar için hem kısmi hem de tam sıralama belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar ile her iki durum karşılaştırmalı olarak ayrıntılı bir şekilde analiz edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, B., DAĞDEVİREN, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of PROMETHEE and fuzzy PROMETHEE methods in equipment selection problem. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 811–826. https://ajindex.com/articles/523800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Dağdeviren, M., ve Eren, T., “Analytical Hierarchy Process and Use of 0-1 Goal Programming Methods in Selecting Supplier Firm”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ.,16, 2, 41- 52, 2001
  2. Kralawski, A., Pedrycz W., ve Nyström L., “Fuzzy Neural Network as Instance Generator for Case-Based Reasoning System: An Example of Selection of Heat Exchange Equipment in Mixing Tanks”, Neural Computing & Applications, 8, 106–113, 1999
  3. Kulak, O., Durmuşoglu, M. B., ve Kahraman, C., “Fuzzy multiattribute equipment selection based on information axiom”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169, 337–345, 2005
  4. Dağdeviren, M., “Decision making in equipment selection: an ıntegrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19, 397-406, 2008
  5. Ayağ, Z., ve Özdemir, R. G., “A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17, 179–190, 2006
  6. Başçetin, A., ve Kesimal, A., “A new approach in selection of loading-hauling systems in surface mining”, 16th Mining Congress of Turkey, ISBN 975-395-310-0, 1999
  7. Başçetin, A., “A decision support system for optimal equipment selection in open pit mining: Analytical Hierarchy Process”, İstanbul Üniv. Müh. Fak. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 16, 2, 1-11, 2003
  8. Chan, F. T. S., Ip, R. W. L., ve Lau, H., “Integration of expert system with analytic hierarchy process for the design of material handling equipment selection system”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 116, 137– 145, 2001
  9. Manassero, G., Semeraro Q., ve Tolio T., “A new method to cope with decision makers' uncertainty in the equipment selection process”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 53, 1, 389-392, 2004
  10. Chakraborty, S., ve Banik, D., “Design of a material handling equipment selection model using Analytical Hierarchy Process”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, 28, 1237-1245, 2006
  11. İç, Y. T., ve Yurdakul, M., “Decision support system for selection of machining centers”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ, 23, 1, 85-95, 2008
  12. Decision Lab, 1.01.0388, copyright © 1998-2000, Visual Decision Inc., Canada. _____
  13. Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw- Hill International Book Company, USA,1980
  14. Schniederjans, M. J., ve Wilson, R.L., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal Programming- for Information System Project Selection”, Information & Management, 20, 5, 333-342, 1991
  15. Sures