Journals / İnsan ve İnsan / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 23

Adultery in Ottoman Society in 19th Century: An Evaluation on the Commit Murders on Some Adultery Events

19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı Toplumunda Zina: Bazı Zina Vakalarında İşlenen Cinayetler Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Pages
1–19
Publication Date
2020-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, today’s murders, called honor killings, have become happened in theOttoman Empire, which dominated a wide geography.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Adultery, which has been described as an ugly, haram, sin and immoral act inthe eyes of societies, has been punished in various ways throughout the history.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the new criminal law in the 19th century, the penalties imposedon adultery were relatively changed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, today’s murders, called honor killings, have become happened in theOttoman Empire, which dominated a wide geography.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Osmanlı · Zina suçu · Ceza

Abstract

Adultery, which has been described as an ugly, haram, sin and immoral act inthe eyes of societies, has been punished in various ways throughout the history. Penalties foradultery crimes vary according to the law of societies and morality of societies. Some societieshave only condemned these adulterous, while others have punished them with the greatestpunishment that can be given. In the Ottoman Empire, the crime of adultery, which is describedas an action against the public morality, has been punished in accordance with the provisionsof şer’i and örfi laws. With the new criminal law in the 19th century, the penalties imposedon adultery were relatively changed. However, the implementation of religious provisions wascontinued due to the fact that şer’i courts continued their duties. In addition, “the woman whocommitted adultery and evil must have been killed related” this fetva applyed. to the relativeswho saw the woman and his accomplice in adultery and killed him, şer’i law and code don’tpunishment. Therefore, today’s murders, called honor killings, have become happened in theOttoman Empire, which dominated a wide geography.

Özet

Toplumların nezdinde çirkin, haram, günah ve ahlaka aykırı bir eylem olarak nitelendirilen

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇABUK, F. (2020). Adultery in Ottoman Society in 19th Century: An Evaluation on the Commit Murders on Some Adultery Events. İnsan ve İnsan, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 23, 1–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/51945

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akbulut, İlhan. “İslam Hukukunda Suçlar ve Cezalar”. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 52/1 (2003): 167-181.
  2. Akgündüz, Ahmet. “Kanunnamelerdeki Ceza Hukuku Hükümleri ve Şer’i Tahlili”. İslami Araştırmalar Dergisi. 12/1 ( 1999): 1-16.
  3. Akman, Mehmet. “Osmanlı Ceza Hukuku Çalışmaları Üzerine Bir İcmal”, Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi. 3/5 (2005): 489-512. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Bab-ıAli Sadaret Dairesi Kalemleri, Sadaret Mektubi Mühimme Kalemi (A.}MKT.MHM.): 308/25 (H. 01 Ra 1281 / M. 4 Ağustos 1864). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Dahiliye Mektubi Kalemi, (DH.MKT.) 2604/125 (H. 29. Ra 1322 / M. 13 Haziran 1904). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Dahiliye Nezareti İdare-i Umûmiye Belgeleri (DH.İ.UM.): 84/28, (H. 18 B 1333 / M. 01 Haziran 1915). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Meclis-i Vala Riyaseti Belgeleri, (MVL.): 68/55, (H. 01 Ş 1262 /M. 25 Temmuz 1846); 199/44 (H. 27 Ş 1266 / M. 08 Temmuz 1850). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). MŞH. FTV. 1/186. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Rumeli Müfettişliği Tasnifi, Manastır Evrakı (TFR.I.MN.):117-11675 (H. 17 M 1325 / M. 02 Mart 1907). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi (A.}MKT.): 37/64 (H. 13 Ra 1262 / M.11 Mart 1846); 140/62 (H. 17 Ş 1264 / M. 19 Temmuz 1848). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi Meclis-i Vâlâ (A.}MKT. MVL.): 80/83 (H. 21 Za 1272 / M. 24 Temmuz 1856); 2/94, (H. 19 L 1262 / M. 10 Ekim 1846); 142/69 (H. 10 N 1278 /M. 11 Mart 1862); 62/25 (H. 29 C 1269 / M.9 Nisan 1853); 66/55 (H.14 S 1270 / M. 16 Kasım 1853); 1/76 (H. 23 L 1261 / M. 25 Ekim 1845); 104/8 (H. 14 Ca 1275 / M. 20 Aralık 1858); /35, (H. 21 R 1264 / M. 27 Mart 1848); 7/11, (H. 28 Ra 1264 / M. 04 Mart 1848); 66/79 (H. 28 S 1270 / M. 30 Kasım 1853); 49/84 (H. 17 R 1268 /M. 9 Şubat 1852); 127/31 (H. 26 L 1277 / M. 07 Mayıs 1861); 123/100 (H. 25 C 1277 / M. 08 Ocak 1861). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi Umum Vilayet (A.} MKT.UM.): 245/60 (H. 21 Za 1272 / M. 24 Temmuz 1856); 259/88 (H. 07 Ra 1273 / M. 5 Kasım 1856); 490/25 (H. 03 S 1278 / M. 10 Ağustos 1861); 144/16 (H. 12 Muharrem 1270 / M. 15 Ekim 1853). Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA). Yıldız Esas Evrakı (Y.EE): 134/43 (H. 05 M 1317/ M. 16 Mayıs 1899); 37/99, (H. 06 R1327 / M. 27 Nisan 1909).
  4. Boynukalın, Mehmet. “İslam Hukukunda Zina Suçu ve Cezası”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, 1995.
  5. Candan, Rabia Beyza. “1840 Tarihli Kanunname-i Hümayunu İncelemesi”. AndHD. 1/1 (2015