SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Frankofoni / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 25

MEANING IN TRANSLATION A STUDY OF PROBLEMATIC AND SOLUTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF INTERPRETIVE TRANSLATION STUDIES APPROACH

ÇEVİRİ’DE ANLAM YORUMLAYICI ANLAM KURAMI IŞIĞINDA BİR SORUNSALLAŞTIRMA VE GEREKÇELENDİRME DENEMESİ

Nazik GÖKTAŞ
Journal
Frankofoni
Pages
329–341
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Secondly, the study strives to shed lighton the cognitive processes of the translator, the focal point of translation, during the understanding,grasping and rewriting in another language stages undertaken in the process of translation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of ‘meaning’ has always had in important place in Translation Studies throughout itshistory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Can it be wholly understood or grasped?
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Secondly, the study strives to shed lighton the cognitive processes of the translator, the focal point of translation, during the understanding,grasping and rewriting in another language stages undertaken in the process of translation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The concept of ‘meaning’ has always had in important place in Translation Studies throughout itshistory. What is meaning? Can it be wholly understood or grasped? Can this grasped meaning thenbe conveyed into another language in the same way, with the same affect and causing the sameimpact? These are some of the question studied and the answers are provided within the scope of theInterpretive Translation Approach developed by Marianne Lederer and Danica Seleskovitch. Thesubject in question is basically meaning in translation. The initial aim of the study is to describe theapproach as developed in the Paris School of Translation. Secondly, the study strives to shed lighton the cognitive processes of the translator, the focal point of translation, during the understanding,grasping and rewriting in another language stages undertaken in the process of translation.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTAŞ, N. (2022). MEANING IN TRANSLATION A STUDY OF PROBLEMATIC AND SOLUTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF INTERPRETIVE TRANSLATION STUDIES APPROACH. Frankofoni, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 25, 329–341. https://ajindex.com/articles/518105

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Bengi-Öner, I., Çeviri Kuramlarını Düşünürken, Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2001
  2. Delisle, J., Analyse du discours comme méthode de traduction. Initiation à la traduction française de texte pragmatiques anglais, Théorie et pratique (2ème edition), Ed. De l’Université d’Ottawa, Ottawa, 1982
  3. Delisle, J., Çeviri Yöntemleri İçin Söylem Çözümlemesi, Çev: J.U. Derkunt, 1982/2001
  4. Delilse, J. et d’autres., Terminologie de la traduction, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1999
  5. Eruz, F. S., Çeviriden Çeviribilime, Yüzyılımız Penceresinden Çeviribilimsel Gelişmelere Bir Bakış, Multilingual Yayınları, İstanbul, 2003
  6. Goester, J.L., “Un point de vue énonciatif sur la traduction”, Le Français dans le monde. Recherches et applications, Août-Septembre 1987, no spécial, Paris, 1987, p.4-10
  7. Kıran (Eziler), A., “Göstergebilim ve Yazınsal çözümlemeler”, Disiplinlerarası Ortam ve Yöntem Sorunları (Prof.Dr.Erdim Öztokat ‘ın anısına), Mültilingual, İstanbul, 2004, s. 50-61
  8. Ladmiral, J.R., Traduire: Théorèmes pour la tarduction, Payot, Paris, 1979 9. Lederer, M., La traduction simultanée, fondements théoriques, Lettres Modernes Minard, Paris, 1981
  9. Lederer, M., “La théorie interprétative de la traduction”, Le Français dans le monde. Recherches et applications, Août-Septembre 1987, no spécial, Paris, 1987, p.11-16
  10. Lederer, M., La traduction aujourd’hui. le modèle interprétatif, Hachette, Paris, 1994
  11. Mounin, G., Les Problèmes théorique de la traduction,Gallimard, Paris, 1963/67
  12. Oseki-Dépré, I., Théories et pratiques de la traduction littéraire, Armand Colin, Paris, 1999
  13. Sartre, J.P., Qu’est-ce que la littérature?, Gallimard, Paris, 1985
  14. Stolze, R., Übersetzungstheorie, Eine Einführung, (Çev: Emra Büyüknisan, Bitirme Tezi), Darmstadt, 1993
  15. Musampa, E. K., “L’environnement cognitif du traducteur et l’interdisciplinarité dans la pratique de la traduction”, Synergies Roumanie n° 6 –, 2011, pp. 29-40
  16. Seleskovitch, D. et Lederer, M. (), Interpréter pour traduire, (4ème Edition revue et corrigée), Didier Éruditions, Paris, 1984/2001
  17. Vardar, B., Açıklamalı Dilbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü, Multilangal Yayınları, İstanbul, 2002
  18. Yazıcı, M., Çeviribilime Giriş, Emek Matbaacılık, İstanbul, 2001
  19. Yücel, F., Tarihsel ve Kuramsal Açıdan Çeviri Edimi, Dost Kitabevi, Ankara, 2007
  20. Zuber, R., Les “belles İnfidèles” et la formation du goût classique,: Albin Michel, Paris, 1968/1994. 22. “Yorumbilim nedir”, 23 Nisan 2012 tarihinde h