Journals / Frankofoni / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 27

DIOGENES AS A PARRHESIASTES

BİR PARRHESİASTES OLARAK DİOGENES

Journal
Frankofoni
Pages
297–307
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study will mainly be based on Michel Foucault’s ideas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of parrhesia which was used in various texts of Ancient Greek and Roman cultures has been translated into different languages as “free”, “honest” or “straightforward” speech.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, Sokrates’ way of using parrhesia will be highlighted together with the transformation of the meaning of the term by Cynics, the followers of Sokrates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study will mainly be based on Michel Foucault’s ideas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The concept of parrhesia which was used in various texts of Ancient Greek and Roman cultures has been translated into different languages as “free”, “honest” or “straightforward” speech. Etymologically, the word parrhesia is made up of pan –everything– and rhema –that which is said– and means “to say everything”. Parrhesiazomai or parrhesiazesthai is to use parrhesia, and parrhesiastes is the one who uses parrhesia. This study will discuss Diogenes as a parrhesiastes and the role of this practice in the activity of philosophizing. For this purpose, it will firstly discuss what could be called parrhesia. Then, Sokrates’ way of using parrhesia will be highlighted together with the transformation of the meaning of the term by Cynics, the followers of Sokrates. Finally, abrief evaluation of the practices of Sokrates and Diogenes as parrhesiastes and the relationship between the punishments and the polis will take place. This study will mainly be based on Michel Foucault’s ideas.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAYCI, N. (2022). DIOGENES AS A PARRHESIASTES. Frankofoni, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 27, 297–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/518060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baudrillard, J. (2006) Sessiz Yığınların Gölgesinde Toplumsalın Sonu, çev. Oğuz Adanır, Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları
  2. Badiou, A. (2011) Felsefe ile Politika Arasındaki Gizemli İlişki, çev. Murat Erşen, İstanbul: MonoKL Yayınları
  3. Foucault, M. (2003) İktidarın Gözü, Seçme Yazılar 4, çev. Işık Ergüden, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. 307 4. Foucault, M. (2005), Doğruyu Söylemek, çev. Kerem Eksen, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları
  4. Foucault, M. (2011) Özne ve İktidar, Seçme Yazılar 2, çev. Işık Ergüden, Osman Akınhay, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları
  5. Foucault, M. (2004) Kendini Bilmek, çev. Gül Çağalı Güven, İstanbul: Om Yayınevi
  6. Gibson, K. ve Graham, J. (2010) (Bildiğimiz) Kapitalizmin Sonu, Siyasal İktisadın Feminist Eleştirisi’, çev. Zeynep Gambetti, İstanbul: Metis Yayınları
  7. Laertios, D. (1925) Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers in the Ten Books, trans. R.D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
  8. Laertios, D. (2003) Ünlü Filozofların Yaşamları ve Öğretileri, çev. Candan Şentuna, İstanbul: YKY
  9. Nietzsche, F. (1965) Zur Genealogie der Moral, Werke in Drei Bänden II, ed. Karl Schlechta, München: Carl Hanser Verlag
  10. Platon (1986), Diyaloglar II, ed. Mustafa Bayka, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi
  11. Plato (1927), Charmides, Alcibiades I, II, Hipparchus, The Lovers, Theages, Minos, Epinomis, trans. by W.R.M. Lamb, LOEB Classical Library, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
  12. Plato (1999), Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus, trans. by H.N. Fowler, LOEB Classical Library, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.