SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Reliability and validity of the Türkish version of the disabilities of the arm.shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire

Kol,omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği

Tülin DÜGER
Çiğdem AYHAN
Çağatay GÜLER
Nuray KIRDI
Selma YÖRÜKAN
Burcu Semin BİLGÜTAY
Edibe YAKUT
Yavuz YAKUT
Hülya KAYIHAN
Gürsel LEBLEBİCİOĞLU
Çiğdem ÖKSÜZ
Pages
99–107
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was moderate correlations between DASH and SF-36 Physical Functioning (r=-0.531, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire is a selfadministered outcome questionnaire measuring physical disability and symptoms for all upper limb disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individuals were given the DASH and other scales (SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale) and grip strength of the individuals was evaluated on their first visit and seven days later.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was moderate correlations between DASH and SF-36 Physical Functioning (r=-0.531, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire is a selfadministered outcome questionnaire measuring physical disability and symptoms for all upper limb disorders. The objective of our study was to translate the DASH into Turkish and to evaluate its test re-test reliability and validity for Turkish speaking patients with upper extremity complaints. Material and method: Translation and back translations of the DASH were performed according to the published guidelines. Individuals were given the DASH and other scales (SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale) and grip strength of the individuals was evaluated on their first visit and seven days later. A total of 134 patients with upper extremity complaints were assessed by the DASH questionnaire. A sub-sample of 75 patients was used to assess retest reliability. Results: Translation-back translation revealed no major difficulties. Test-retest reliability of DASH-Function/Symptom was 0.910 and DASH-Work Model was 0.793. There was moderate correlations between DASH and SF-36 Physical Functioning (r=-0.531, p

Özet

Kol, Omuz ve El Sorunları Anketi (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand - DASH), tüm üst ekstremite bozukluklarında fiziksel özür ve semptomları ölçen bir kendi kendini değerlendirme sonuç ölçümü anketidir. Çalışmamızın amacı, DASH anketinin Türkçe kültürel adaptasyonunu yapmak ve üst ekstremite şikayeti olan Türkçe konuşan hastalar için test - tekrar test güvenirliğini ve geçerliğini değerlendirmekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: DASH’ın Türkçe’ye ve tekrar İngilizce’ye çevirisi yayınlanmış rehberlere göre yapıldı. Hastaların DASH, diğer skalalar (SF-36, Görsel Analog Skalası) ve kavrama kuvveti ölçümü ilk gün ve 7 gün sonra değerlendirildi. DASH anketi ile üst ekstremite şikâyeti olan toplam 134 hasta değerlendirildi. 75 hastada test - tekrar test güvenirliği değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Türkçe ve İngilizce çeviri büyük güçlükler göstermedi. DASH-Fonksiyon/Semptom test - tekrar test güvenirliği 0.910 ve DASH-İş Modeli 0.793 bulundu. SF-36 Fiziksel Fonksiyon (r=-0.531, p

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜGER, T., AYHAN, Ç., GÜLER, Ç., KIRDI, N., YÖRÜKAN, S., BİLGÜTAY, B. S., YAKUT, E., YAKUT, Y., KAYIHAN, H., LEBLEBİCİOĞLU, G., ÖKSÜZ, Ç. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Türkish version of the disabilities of the arm.shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 99–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/516923

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Colville RJ, Nicholson KS, Belcher HJ. Hand surgery and quality of life. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999;24:263-266
  2. Szabo RM. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful? J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:993- 1002
  3. Davis AM, Beaton DE, Hudak P, et al. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:269-274
  4. Overend TJ, Wuori-Fearn JL, Kramer JF, et al. Reliability of a patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire for patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:31-37
  5. Chiari-Grisar C, Koller U, Stamm TA, et al. Performance of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome questionnaire and the Moberg picking up test in patients with finger joint arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:203-206
  6. Jester A, Harth A, Germann G. Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:1074
  7. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602-608
  8. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, et al. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2005;30:23-28
  9. Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:154-162
  10. McConnel S, Beaton DE, Bombardier C. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand: the DASH outcome measure user’s manual. 1st ed. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health; 1999
  11. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:913-923
  12. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;16;4:11
  13. Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am].