Journals / Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon / 2007 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Determining the functional state in acquired and congenital child amputees

Edinsel ve konjenital çocuk amputelerde fonksiyonel durumun belirlenmesi

Pages
187–193
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An important difference was found to be between the data of the three evaluations in both groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Aim of this study was to investigate the abilities and limitations of the acquired and congenital child amputees in functional activities with and without prostheses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: A total of 41 children (21 congenital, 20 acquired) whose ages varied between 8-17 years participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An important difference was found to be between the data of the three evaluations in both groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Aim of this study was to investigate the abilities and limitations of the acquired and congenital child amputees in functional activities with and without prostheses. Material and methods: A total of 41 children (21 congenital, 20 acquired) whose ages varied between 8-17 years participated in the study. Prosthetic fitting, prosthetic training and rehabilitation were given to the children after general physiotherapy evaluations. The assessments were performed in their first attendance, after 3 weeks of prosthetic training and 6 months after their discharge. The Child Amputee Prosthetic and Project Functional Status Inventory were applied with and without prostheses. Results: It was seen that there was no significant difference in the physical characteristics of two groups (p>0.05). The evaluation of data between the groups showed significant difference in favor of the congenital group with respect to CAPP-FSI in the first and in the second assessment done 3 weeks after (p0.05). An important difference was found to be between the data of the three evaluations in both groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, edinsel veya konjenital ekstremite kaybı olan çocukların protezli ve protezsiz olarak fonksiyonel aktivitelerdeki yeterlilik ve yetersizlikleri tespit etmektir. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya 8-17 yaşları arasında, 21 konjenital ve 20 edinsel nedenler ile ampute olan toplam 41 çocuk olgu katıldı. İki gruba ayrılan olgular, genel fizyoterapi değerlendirmeleri açısından incelendikten sonra, protez yapım, eğitimi ve rehabilitasyon programına alındılar. İlk olarak ünitemize başvurduklarında, ikinci olarak protez eğitimlerinin tamamlandığı 3 haftalık dönem sonrasında değerlendirildiler ve protezleri tamamlandıktan 6 ay sonra kontrole çağrıldıklarında üçüncü değerlendirmeleri yapıldı. Değerlendirme kapsamında Çocuk Amputelerde Fonksiyonel Durum Belirleme Testi (The Child Amputee Prosthetic Project-Functional Status Inventory [CAPP-FSI]) ile fonksiyonel değerlendirmeleri protezli ve protezsiz yapıldı. Sonuçlar: Olguların fiziksel özellikleri karşılaştırıldığında gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı görüldü (p>0.05). CAPP-FSI açısından ilk ve 3 haftalık dönem sonrası değerlendirme sonuçları gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldığında, parametrelerin çoğunda konjenital grup lehine anlamlı fark bulundu (p0.05). Her iki grupta da ilk, 3 haftalık eğitim ve 6 ay sonraki dönem değerlendirme sonuçları karşılaştırıldığında ise dönemler arasında anlamlı fark olduğu gözlendi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜLGER, Ö., TOPUZ, S., ŞENER, G., BAYRAMLAR, K. (2022). Determining the functional state in acquired and congenital child amputees. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/516903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Amputation. Handbook of Disabilities. 2001. www.rcep7.org/projects/handbook/amputation.pdf
  2. Challenor Y. Limb deficiencies in children. In: Molnar GE, ed. Pediatric Rehabilitation. Baltimore: William&Wilkins; 1992: 400-424
  3. Jain S. Rehabilitation in limb deficiency
  4. The pediatric amputee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1996;77:S9-13
  5. Nelson VS, Flood KM, Bryant PR, et al. Limb deficiency and prosthetic management
  6. Decision making in prosthetic prescription and management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(3 Suppl 1):S3-9
  7. Yiğiter K, Ülger Ö, Şener G, et al. Demography and function of children with limb loss. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005;29:131-138
  8. Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in children with limb deficiency: development and initial validation of an outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:1233-1238
  9. Pruitt SD, Seid M, Varni JW, et al. Toddlers with limb deficiency: conceptual basis and initial application of a functional status outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:819-824
  10. Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Seid M, et al. Functional status in limb deficiency: development of an an outcome measure for preschool children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:405-411
  11. Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Seid M, et al. Prosthesis satisfaction outcome measurement in pediatric limb deficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:750-754
  12. Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M. Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: a comparison of 3 self-report scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1432-1440
  13. Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O’Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27:191-206
  14. Treweek SP, Condie ME. Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: a retrospective review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998;22:178-185
  15. Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, et al. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:931-938
  16. Smith DG, Horn P, Malchow D, et al. Prosthetic history, prosthetic charges and functional outcome of the isolated, traumatic below-knee amputee. J Trauma. 1995; 38:44-47
  17. Rubenfeld LA, Varni JW, Talbot D, et al. Variables influencing self-esteem in children with congenital or acquired limb deficiency. JACPOC. 1988;23:85-86
  18. Shirley C. Integration of pediatric amputees and th