SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon / 2009 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of different balance scales in Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson hastalığında farklı denge ölçeklerinin karşılaştırılması

Nezire KÖSE
Sevil BİLGİN
Bülent ELİBOL
Gündüz Arzu GÜNDÜZ
Ayşe Saadet OTMAN
Pages
17–24
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, it was also revealed that, Berg Balance Scale is more reliable (ICC=0.99) and showing higher correlation with motor part of Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (r=-0.75, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The main purpose of our study is finding out whether different methods used in evaluating balance are reliable and valid for Parkinson Disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: In the study, thirty idiopathic Parkinson patients were evaluated by Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Performance Oriented Balance and Gait Scale, and clinical balance and mobility tests at their “off” and “on” periods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, it was also revealed that, Berg Balance Scale is more reliable (ICC=0.99) and showing higher correlation with motor part of Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (r=-0.75, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of our study is finding out whether different methods used in evaluating balance are reliable and valid for Parkinson Disease. Material and methods: In the study, thirty idiopathic Parkinson patients were evaluated by Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Performance Oriented Balance and Gait Scale, and clinical balance and mobility tests at their “off” and “on” periods. Additionally; the patients were evaluated by motor evaluation part of Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale. All the evaluation tests were repeated 7 days after the first applications. Results: Comparisons revealed that all the balance evaluation tests were reliable and valid for Parkinson patients. On the other hand, it was also revealed that, Berg Balance Scale is more reliable (ICC=0.99) and showing higher correlation with motor part of Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (r=-0.75, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, dengenin değerlendirmesinde kullanılan farklı değerlendirme yöntemlerinin, Parkinson hastalığındaki güvenirlik ve geçerliklerini karşılaştırmaktı. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmada 30 idiopatik Parkinson hastasına, “off” ve “on” dönemlerinde; Berg Denge Ölçeği, Tinetti Performansa Dayalı Denge ve Yürüme Ölçeği ile klinik denge ve fonksiyonel mobilite testleri yapıldı. Ayrıca hastalara Birleştirilmiş Parkinson Hastalığı Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin motor değerlendirme bölümü ile Modifiye Hoehn ve Yahr Ölçeği de uygulandı. Tüm değerlendirmeler 7 gün sonra tekrar edildi. Sonuçlar: Elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırıldığı zaman, uygulanan tüm denge değerlendirmelerinin Parkinson hastaları için güvenilir ve geçerli yöntemler olduğu, ancak Berg Denge Ölçeği’nin daha fazla güvenirlik (ICC=0.99), Birleştirilmiş Parkinson Hastalığı Değerlendirme Ölçeği motor değerlendirme bölümü (r=-0.75, p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, N., BİLGİN, S., ELİBOL, B., GÜNDÜZ, G. A., OTMAN, A. S. (2022). Comparison of different balance scales in Parkinson’s disease. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 17–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/516876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bilclough J, Wood B, Bowron A, et al. Specialised physiotherapy assessment and falls prediction in Parkinson’s Disease. Age Ageing. 2001;30:48
  2. Smithson F, Morris ME, Iansek R. Performance on clinical tests of balance in Parkinson’s Disease. Phys Ther. 1998;78:577-592
  3. Visser M, Marinus J, Bloem BR, et al. Clinical tests for the evaluation of postural instability in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1669-1674
  4. Gray P, Hildebrand K. Fall risk factors in Parkinson’s Disease. J Neurosci Nurs. 2000;32:222-228
  5. Morris S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Reliability of measurements of obtained with the timed “Up and Go” Test in people with Parkinson’s Disease. Phys Ther. 2001;81:810-818
  6. Steffen T, Seney M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectible change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Healty Survey, and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in people with Parkinsonism. Phys Ther. 2008; 88:733-746
  7. Qutubuddin AA, Pegg PO, Cifu DX, et al. Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson’s disease: a key to rehabilitation evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:789-792
  8. Lim LI, van Wegen E, de Goede CJ, et al. Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson’s patients’ own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11:19-24
  9. Brusse KJ, Zimdars S, Zalewski KR, et al. Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2005;85:134-141
  10. Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK. Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1369-1378
  11. Allison L, Fuller K, Balance and vestibular disorders. In:Umphred DA, ed. Neurological Rehabilitation. Mosby. New York: 2001: 616-660
  12. Akbostancı MC, Balaban H, Atbaşoğlu C. Birleşik Parkinson Hastalığı Değerleme Ölçeği Motor Muayene Bölümü ve Anormal İstemsiz Hareketler Ölçeği’nin değerlendiriciler arası güvenilirlik çalışması. Parkinson Hastalığı ve Hareket Bozukluğu Dergisi. 2000;3:7-13
  13. Chiu AY, Au-Yeung SS, Lo SK. A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating in older people. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25: 45-50
  14. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, et al. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol.1990;45, 192-197
  15. Franchignoni F, Martignoni E, Ferriero G, et al. Balance and fear of falling in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism R