SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon / 2009 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of upper extremity performance in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Comparison of nine hole peg test values with unified parkinson’s disease rating scale

Parkinson hastalarında üst ekstremite performansının değerlendirilmesi: Dokuz delikli peg testi ile birleştirilmiş parkinson hastalığı değerlendirme ölçeği’nin karşılaştırılması

Semra OĞUZ
Halim İŞSEVER
Güneş KIZILTAN
Fatma MUTLUAY
Sibel ÖZEKMEKÇİ
H. Nilgün GÜRSES
Anıl TEKEOĞLU
Pages
49–55
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: There was poor correlation between NHPT for the leftside with UPDRS1 and UPDRS3 (item 20, 21-left) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the “Nine Hole Peg Test” (NHPT) with “Unified Parkinson’s DiseaseRating Scale” (UPDRS) in the evaluation of upper extremity performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials andmethods: Eighty seven patients with Parkinson’s disease (28 F, 59 M; mean age: 63.6±10.4years) were recruited in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: There was poor correlation between NHPT for the leftside with UPDRS1 and UPDRS3 (item 20, 21-left) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the “Nine Hole Peg Test” (NHPT) with “Unified Parkinson’s DiseaseRating Scale” (UPDRS) in the evaluation of upper extremity performance. Materials andmethods: Eighty seven patients with Parkinson’s disease (28 F, 59 M; mean age: 63.6±10.4years) were recruited in the study. The stage of the disease and intensity of the symptomswere assessed by a neurologist using the Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) scale and UPDRS. The NHPT wasassessed by physiotherapists. Results: There was poor correlation between NHPT for the leftside with UPDRS1 and UPDRS3 (item 20, 21-left) (p

Özet

Amaç: Parkinson hastalarında üst ekstremite performansının değerlendirilmesinde Dokuz DelikliPeg Testi (DDPT) ile Birleştirilmiş Parkinson Hastalığı Değerlendirme Ölçeği”ni (BPHDÖ)karşılaştırmaktı. Gereç ve yöntem: Yaş ortalaması 63.6±10.4 yıl olan, 87 Parkinson hastası(28 K, 59 E) çalışmaya alındı. Hastalık evresi ve semptomlarının şiddeti nörolog tarafındanHoehn-Yahr (H-Y) ölçeği ve BPHDÖ kullanılarak değerlendirildi. DDPT ise fizyoterapistlertarafından yaptırıldı. Sonuçlar: DDPT sol ile BPHDÖ1 ve BPHDÖ3 (Madde 20, 21-sol) arasındazayıf, BPHDÖ2, BPHDÖ3, BPHDÖ3 (Madde 22-25-sol) ve BPHDÖ Toplam arasında orta düzeydeilişki saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, S., İŞSEVER, H., KIZILTAN, G., MUTLUAY, F., ÖZEKMEKÇİ, S., GÜRSES, H. N., TEKEOĞLU, A. (2022). Evaluation of upper extremity performance in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Comparison of nine hole peg test values with unified parkinson’s disease rating scale. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/516866

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Rajput AH, Rajput A, Rajput M. Epidemiology of Parkinsonism. In: Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Koller WC, eds. Handbook of Parkinson’s Disease. New York: Basel: Marcel Dekker; 2003: 17-42
  2. Güçlü A, Armutlu K, Elibol B. Parkinson hastalarının “on” ve “off” durumlarındaki fiziksel ve motor performanslarının değerlendirilmesi. Parkinson Hast Hareket Boz Der. 2001;4:18-26
  3. Taylor Tavares AL, Jefferis GS, Koop M, et al. Quantitative measurement of alternating finger tapping in Parkinson’s disease correlate with UPDRS motor disability and reveal the improvement in fine motor control from medication and deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord. 2005;20:1286-1298
  4. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonizm: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427-442
  5. Fahn S, Elton RL, and members of the UPDRS Development Committee. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Goldstein M, Calne CD, eds. Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease. Volume 11. Florham Park, New Jersey: Macmillan; 1987:153-163
  6. Schwab RS, England AC. Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s disease. In: Gillingham FJ DI, ed. Third Symposium on Parkinson’s Disease. Edinburgh: Livingstone; 1969:152–157
  7. Kraus PH, Klotz P, Hoffmann A et al. Analysis of the course of Parkinson’s disease under dopaminergic therapy: Performance of “fast tapping” is not a suitable parameter. Mov Disord. 2005;20:348-354
  8. Muller T, Schäfer S, Kuhn W et al. Correlation between tapping and inserting of pegs in Parkinson’s Disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 2000;4:311-315
  9. Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, et al. Adults norm for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:570-573
  10. Hughes AJ, Ben-Shlomo Y, Daniel SE et al. What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson’s disease: a clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 1992;42:1142-1146
  11. Kokko SM, Paltamaa J, Ahola E, et al. The assessment of functional ability in patients with Parkinson’s disease: The PLM-test and three clinical tests. Physiother Res Int. 1997;2:29-45
  12. Ghika J, Wiegner AW, Fang JJ, et al. Portable system for quantifying motor abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993;40:276-283
  13. Goodkin DE, Hertsgaard D, Seminary J. Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine hole peg tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:850-854
  14. Hatanaka T, Koyama T, Kanemats