Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 656

VERTICAL PRICE TRANSMISSION IN TURKISH RED MEATMARKETS

TÜRKĠYE’DE KIRMIZI ET PĠYASALARINDA DĠKEY FĠYAT AKTARIMI

Pages
149–177
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the carcass-retail price relationship, there is an asymmetry in beef markets in the long run and in sheep meat markets in the short run, that is, there are differences in the long run parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of vertical price transmission in the meat supply chain in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The loss of welfare that consumers bear due to the price increase is more than the earnings they gain due to the decrease in price.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the carcass-retail price relationship, there is an asymmetry in beef markets in the long run and in sheep meat markets in the short run, that is, there are differences in the long run parameters.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of vertical price transmission in the meat supply chain in Turkey. The paper develops a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model (NARDL) to estimate long and short term price elasticities based on negative and positive price changes using monthly meat prices. The empirical analysis is carried out for two stages of meat marketing chain: from farm prices to wholesale meat prices (carcass) and from wholesale prices to retail meat prices. According to the estimation results, there is an evidence regarding vertical price transmission between red meat supply chains. The long run parameter, which indicates the effect of positive changes in carcass beef prices on retail prices, is greater than the parameter for negative changes. The loss of welfare that consumers bear due to the price increase is more than the earnings they gain due to the decrease in price. Negative shocks in both farm-carcass and carcass-retail price relations cause price increases in sheep meat markets. For the carcass-retail price relationship, there is an asymmetry in beef markets in the long run and in sheep meat markets in the short run, that is, there are differences in the long run parameters.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı Türkiye‟de kırmızı et arz zincirinde dikey fiyat aktarımının özelliklerini araĢtırmaktır. Negatif ve pozitif fiyat Ģoklarının aktarımındaki potansiyel asimetrinin tahmin edilmesine izin veren doğrusal olmayan otoregresif dağıtılmıĢ gecikme modeli (NARDL) oluĢturulmuĢ ve aylık fiyat verileri kullanılarak dana ve koyun eti piyasaları için tahmin edilmiĢtir. ÇalıĢmada üretici fiyatlarından toptan et satıĢ fiyatlarına ve toptan fiyatlardan perakende fiyatlara doğru iki farklı pazarlama zinciri incelenmiĢtir. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre, kırmızı et arz zincirleri arasında dikey fiyat aktarımının olduğuna dair kanıt bulunmuĢtur. Karkas dana eti fiyatlarındaki pozitif değiĢimlerin perakende fiyatlar üzerindeki etkisini gösteren uzun dönem parametresi, negatif değiĢimlere ait parametreden daha büyüktür. Tüketicilerin fiyat artıĢı nedeniyle katlanacağı refah kaybı, fiyat düĢüĢü nedeniyle elde edeceği kazançtan fazladır. Koyun eti piyasalarında ise hem çiftlik-karkas hem de karkas-perakende fiyat iliĢkilerinde negatif Ģoklar fiyat artıĢına sebep olmaktadır. Karkas-perakende fiyat iliĢkisi için dana eti piyasalarında uzun; koyun etinde ise kısa dönemde asimetri, yani uzun dönem parametrelerinde farklılıklar bulunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖPRÜCÜ, Y., TAŞTAN, H. (2022). VERTICAL PRICE TRANSMISSION IN TURKISH RED MEATMARKETS. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 656, 149–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/516510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ABDULAI, Awudu; (2002), “Using Threshold Cointegration to Estimate Asymmetric Price Transmission in The Swiss Pork Market”, Applied Economics, 34(6), pp. 679-687.
  2. AHN, Byeong-il and Hyunok LEE; (2015), “Vertical Price Transmission of Perishable Products: The Case of Fresh Fruits in the Western United States”, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 40(3), pp. 405-424.
  3. ARAL, Yılmaz; (2007), “Türkiye‟de Bazı Kamu, Özel Sektör Mezbaha Ve Et Kombinalarında Sığır Kesim Hattı Etkinliği Ġle Kesim AĢamalarındaki ĠĢgücü Verimliliklerinin Ölçümü Üzerine Bir AraĢtırma”, Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. BALKE, Nathan S. and Thomas B. FOMBY; (1997), “Threshold cointegration”, International Economic Review, 38, pp. 627–645.
  4. BECKER, Ralf, ENDERS, Walter and Stan HURN; (2004). “A general test for time dependence in parameters”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(7), pp. 899-906.
  5. BEN-KAABIA, M. and José M. GIL; (2007), “Asymmetric price transmission in the Spanish lamb sector”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 34(1), pp. 53-80.
  6. BROWN, R. L., DURBĠN, J., and J. M. EVANS; (1975), “Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), pp. 149-163.
  7. VAN CAMPENHOUT, Bjorn; (2007), “Modelling trends in food market integration: Method and an application to Tanzanian maize markets”, Food Policy, 32(1), pp. 112-127.
  8. CAPITANIO, Fabian, Felice ADINOLFI, Barry K. GOODWIN and Giorgia RIVIECCIO; (2019), “A copula-based approach to investigate vertical shock price transmission in the Italian hog market”, New Medit, A Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment, 18(1), pp. 3-14.
  9. CHAVAS, Jean-Paul and Aashish MEHTA; (2004), “Price Dynamics in a Vertical Sector: The Case of Butter”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 86, pp. 1078–1093.
  10. VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL, S. and J. P. LOY; (1997), “Price Asymmetry in the International Wheat Market: Comment”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44, pp. 311-317.
  11. ÇAĞATAY, S. ve O.P. SAYGIN; (2009), “Türkiye'de Tarımsal Asimetrik Arz Tepkisinin Test Edilmesi ve Kırsal Kesimden Kentlere GerçekleĢen Ġç Göçün Asimetri Üzerindeki Etkisinin Bulunması”, TÜBĠTAK, SOBAG Projesi, Proje No: 107K421. DICKEY, David A. and Wayne A. FULLER; (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, pp. 427–431.