Journals / Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

The histological and histochemical characteristics on the uropygial gland of female and male partridge (alectoris chukar)

Dişi ve erkek keklik (alectoris chukar) üropigial bezinin histolojik ve histokimyasal özellikleri

Pages
7–12
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of histochemical applications, it was also determined that carboxylated mucosubstance was intense in female’s uropygial gland while neutral mucosubstance was intense in male’s uropygial gland.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to determine histological and histochemical structure of uropygial gland of female and male partridge (Alectoris chukar).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was detected that there was no significant difference between glands of female and male by the histological aspect and the wall thickness of male’s gland was thinner than female’s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of histochemical applications, it was also determined that carboxylated mucosubstance was intense in female’s uropygial gland while neutral mucosubstance was intense in male’s uropygial gland.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine histological and histochemical structure of uropygial gland of female and male partridge (Alectoris chukar). For this purpose, the gland samples taken from four adult female and four adult male partridge were used as the material. It was detected that there was no significant difference between glands of female and male by the histological aspect and the wall thickness of male’s gland was thinner than female’s. As a result of histochemical applications, it was also determined that carboxylated mucosubstance was intense in female’s uropygial gland while neutral mucosubstance was intense in male’s uropygial gland.

Özet

Bu çalışmada dişi ve erkek keklik (Alectoris chukar) üropigial bezinin histolojik ve histokimyasal yapısının belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Bu amaçla dörder adet erişkin dişi ve erkek keklikten alınan bez örnekleri materyal olarak kullanıldı. Dişi ve erkek bireylere ait bezler arasında histolojik yönden belirgin bir farklılığın olmadığı, sadece erkek bireylerde bezin duvar kalınlığının dişilerdekine nazaran daha ince yapıda olduğu belirlendi. Ayrıca histokimyasal uygulamaları sonucunda dişi üropigial bezinde karboksilatlı mukosubstansın, erkek üropigial bezinde ise nötral mukosubstansın yoğun bulunduğu saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, K., TÜRK, S., ÖNAL, Ö. (2022). The histological and histochemical characteristics on the uropygial gland of female and male partridge (alectoris chukar). Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 7–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/515112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aslan Ş. Örtü Sistemi. In: Özer A. (Editör). Veteriner Özel Histoloji
  2. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık 2011: 131-132
  3. Zık B, Erdost H. Horozlarda acı kırmızı biberli rasyonla beslemenin üropigi bezi üzerine etkisinin histolojik yönden incelenmesi. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2002; 26: 1223-1232
  4. Harem MÇ, Altunay H, Harem İŞ, Beyaz F. Yaban ve evcil ördeklerde preen bezi üzerinde histomorfolojik ve histokimyasal çalışmalar. J Sci 2005; 14: 20-30
  5. Kolattukudy PE. Avian uropygial (preen) gland. Meth Enzymol 1981; 72: 714-720
  6. Bhattacacharyya SP, Ghosh A. Histochemical studies on the enzymes of the uropygial gland. Acta Histochem 1971; 39: 318-326
  7. Chem Shamwkey MD, Pillai SR, Hill GE. Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria. J Avian Biol 2003; 34: 345-349
  8. Daniel JY, Vignon F, Assenmacher I, Rochefort H. Evidence of androgen and estrogen receptors in the preen gland of male ducks. Steroids 1977; 30: 703-709
  9. Amet Y, Abalain JH, Daniel JY, Stefano SD, Floch HH. Testosterone regulation of androgen receptor levels in the uropygial gland of quails (Coturnix coturnix): A further proof fort he androgen dependency of the uropygial gland. Gen Comp Endocrinol1986; 62: 210-216
  10. Culling CFA, Reid PE, Dunn WL. A new histochemical method for the identification and visualization of both side chain acylated and non-acylated sialic acids. J Histochem Cytochem 1976; 24: 1225-1230
  11. McManus JFA. Histological and histochemical uses of periodic acid. Stain Technol 1948; 23: 99-108
  12. Lev R, Spicer SS. Specific staining of sulphate groups with alcian blue at low pH. J Histochem Cytochem 1964; 12: 309
  13. Mowry RW. Alcian blue tecniques fort he histochemical study of acidic carbohydrates. J Histochem Cytochem 1956; 4: 407-408
  14. Gomari G. Gomari’s aldehyde fuchsin stain. In: Culling CFA, Allison RT, Barr WT. (Editors). Cellular Pathology Tecnique. London: Butterworths 1952: 238
  15. Spicer SS, Mayer DR. Aldehyde fuchsin/Alcian blue. In: Culling CFA, Allison RT, Barr WT. (Editors). Cellular Pathology Tecnique. London: Butterworths, 1960: 233
  16. Sawad AA. Morphological and histological study of uropygial gland in moorhen (G. Gallinula C. choropus). Poult Sci J 2006; 5: 938-941
  17. Asnani MV, Ramachandran AV. Roles of adrenal and gonadal steroids and season in uropygial gland function in male pigeons, Columba livia. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1993; 92: 213-224
  18. Abalain JH, Amet Y, Lecaque D, et al. Ultrastructural change