Journals / Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Tavuklardan izole edilen Escherichia coli suşlarının random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)analizi ile tiplendirilmesi

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of Escherichia coli ısolated from chickens

Pages
1–4
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicated that there were great genetic heterogeneity between E.coli strains in this region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 48 E.coli strains isolated from colibacillosis suspicious hens at different poultry houses were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bacterial growth was observed in 110 samples, 48 (13,6%) of which were identified as Escherichia coli (E.coli).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicated that there were great genetic heterogeneity between E.coli strains in this region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:110 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, 48 E.coli strains isolated from colibacillosis suspicious hens at different poultry houses were examined. These samples were inoculated on to blood agar and then suspicious colonies were transferred on to EMB and MacConcey agar. Bacterial growth was observed in 110 samples, 48 (13,6%) of which were identified as Escherichia coli (E.coli). E.coli strains were typed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to detect the genetic differences between at E.coli strains in this region. Extracted DNA samples from 48 strains of E.coli were amplified by RAPD primer (COL 1). Nine different band profiles were obtained. These results indicated that there were great genetic heterogeneity between E.coli strains in this region. RAPD analysis had the highest discriminatory capacity for typing E.coli isolates. Because of its simplicity and rapidity, RAPD analysis appears to be a highly valuable tool for studying E.coli molecular epidemiology.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, colibacillosis şüpheli farklı kanatlı işletmelerinden 48 E.coli suşu izole ve identifiye edildi. Suşların kanlı agara ekimleri yapıldıktan sonra, EMB ve MacConkey agara ekimleri yapıldı.110 örneğin bakteriyel kültürü sonucunda 48 (%13,6)’i E.coli olarak identifiye edildi. Bu bölgedeki E.coli soyları arasındaki genetik farklılıkları tespit etmek için RAPD metodu uygulandı. 48 E.coli izolatından ekstrakte edilen DNA’lar RAPD primer (COL 1) ile çoğaltıldı. RAPD analizinden dokuz farklı profil elde edildi. Bu sonuçlar bu bölgedeki E.coli soyları arasında büyük bir genetik farklılık olduğunu gösterdi. RAPD metodunun E.coli soylarını tiplendirmede yüksek oranda ayırıcı olduğu görüldü. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma; RAPD metodunun hem kolay hem de daha hızlı olmasından ötürü, E.coli’nin moleküler epidemiyolojisinin çalışılmasında, yüksek oranda etkili bir metod olduğunu gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, A., ÖZBEY, G., MUZ, A., ERTAŞ, H. B. (2022). Tavuklardan izole edilen Escherichia coli suşlarının random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)analizi ile tiplendirilmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/515268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 142–201
  2. Gross WB, Siegel PB. Coliform peritonitis of chickens. Avian Dis 1959; 3: 370-373
  3. Nagi MS, Mathey WJ. Interaction of Escherichia coli and Eimeria burnetti in chickens. Avian Dis 1972; 16: 864-873
  4. Piercy DWT, West B. Experimental Escherichia coli infection in broiler chickens course of disease induced by inoculation via the air sac route. J Comp Pathol 1976; 203-210
  5. Gross WB, Domermuth CH. Colibacillosis, isolation and identification of avian pathogens. 2nd Edition American Association of Avian pathology USA, 1980
  6. Fernandez A, Gazquez A, Mendez A, Mozos E, Jover A. Morphopathology of adenohypophysis of chickens in shock induced by Escherichia coli. Avian Dis 1986; 30: 247-254
  7. Selander RK, Caugant DA, Ochman H. et al. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 51: 873-884
  8. Romling U, Grouthes D, Heuer T, Tummler B. Physical genome analysis of bacteria. Electrophoresis 1992; 13: 626-631 9. Welsh J, Mcclelland M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18: 7213- 7218
  9. Persing DH, Smith TF, Tenover FC, White TJ. Diagnostic molecular microbiology: principles and applications. American Society for Microbiology Pres Washington DC 1993
  10. Maslow JN, Mulligan ME, Arbeit RD. Molecular epidemiology: application of contemporary techniques to the typing of microorganisms. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17: 153- 164
  11. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV. et al. İnterpreting chrosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsedfield gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 2233- 2239
  12. Williams JGK, Hanafey KM, Rafalski JA, Thagey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic marker. Nucleic Acid Res 1990; 18: 6531- 6535
  13. Finegold SM, William MJ. Diagnostic Microbiology. 6 th ed London, The CV Mosby Company, 1982; 294- 302
  14. Ewers C, Janssen T, Wieler LH. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2003; 116 (9-10): 381-395
  15. Maurer JJ, Lee MD, Lobsinger C et al. Molecular typing of avian Escherichia coli isolates by random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Avian Dis 1998; 42: 431-451
  16. Lam KM, Yamamoto R, Damassa AJ. DNA Diversity among isolates of Campylobacter jejuni detected by PCRbased RAPD fingerprinting. Vet Mi